[1]周 泽,全 斌*,张海波.土地利用冲突特征识别及驱动力分析——以滇中城市群为例[J].山地学报,2024,(2):210-224.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000817]
　ZHOU Ze,QUAN Bin*,ZHANG Haibo.Identification of Land-Use Conflict Characteristics and Analysis of Driving Forces: Taking the Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration as an Example[J].Mountain Research,2024,(2):210-224.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000817]
点击复制

土地利用冲突特征识别及驱动力分析——以滇中城市群为例
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第2期
页码:
210-224
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2024-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Identification of Land-Use Conflict Characteristics and Analysis of Driving Forces: Taking the Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration as an Example
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)2-210-15
作者:
周 泽1; 全 斌1; 2*; 张海波1; 2
(1.衡阳师范学院 地理与旅游学院,湖南 衡阳 421002; 2.联合国教科文组织国际自然与文化遗产空间技术中心衡阳分中心,湖南 衡阳421002)
Author(s):
ZHOU Ze1;  QUAN Bin1; 2*;  ZHANG Haibo1; 2
(1. College of Geography and Tourism, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, Hunan, China; 2. Hengyang Base of International Centre on Space Technologies for Natural and Cultural Heritage under the Auspices of UNESCO, Hengyang 421002, Hunan, China)
关键词:
土地利用冲突;  景观格局;  强度分析;  驱动力;  滇中城市群
Keywords:
land-use conflict;  landscape pattern;  intensity analysis;  driving force;  the central Yunnan urban agglomeration
分类号:
F301.2
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000817
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
识别土地利用冲突演变特征及驱动机制,是确定区域国土资源配置可持续发展路径的基础。单一的土地利用分析方法,对地类内部间转化的更多潜在信息挖掘不足,致使冲突演变过程中的地类变化状态特征不够明确。本研究以滇中城市群为研究对象,构建土地利用转换图谱直观表达土地利用的转换模式; 从景观斑块的角度构建土地利用冲突测算模型识别滇中城市群1990—2020年土地利用冲突; 将变化成分方法和强度分析方法相结合,探讨不同冲突演变下各地类的增加和减少强度特征; 基于斑块生成模型(PLUS),揭示土地利用冲突驱动机制。研究结论:(1)土地利用强度指数由0.11%增长到0.79%,以交换变化为主,耕地和建设用地的数量变化显著,且耕地趋向性转变为建设用地。土地利用平均冲突指数增长了0.07,在空间上呈现西强东弱的分布特征,集中表现在东部地势平坦的耕地、林地和草地被建设用地侵占。耕地数量的减少主要受人口密度的影响,建设用地的扩张则受人口密度和GDP的影响较大。土地利用冲突与地类之间剧烈的转换密不可分,在冲突增强的区域,建设用地的增加强度和耕地的减少强度较大,且耕地和草地减少、建设用地的增加强度活跃。(2)兼顾自然禀赋大的生态用地和脆弱耕地的可持续利用是城市发展的必然选择。山地城市群土地利用冲突的缓解需重点保护地势平坦的生态用地。山地城市的开发建设需规避耕地、基本农田碎片化的风险。缓解高原山地城市群土地利用冲突的关键在于严格控制人口高度聚集和客观追求经济发展。本研究可为滇中城市群的国土空间动态监测和山地城市群的城市规划和土地可持续发展提供依据和参考。
Abstract:
Identifying the evolution characteristics and driving mechanisms of land-use conflicts is a prerequisite for constructing a sustainable development path of regional land resource allocation. Any methodology of single land-use analysis was not enough to mine more potential information about the transformation between land types, which leads to the lack of clarity on the characteristics of land types in the process of conflict evolution.
In this study, by the urban agglomeration in central Yunnan province of China, it exemplified a proper construction of land use conversion map to visually present a land-use conversion pattern; it introduced a land use conflict measurement model based on landscape patches to identify land-use conflicts in the urban agglomeration from 1990 to 2020; it combined composition change method with intensity analysis method to explore the intensity of increasing or decreasing in each land-use type under different land-use conflict circumstances; then driving mechanism of land-use conflicts was determined by PLUS model(based on patch generation).
(1)From 1990 to 2020, the land-use intensity index increased from 0.11% to 0.79%, dominated by land exchange, with significant changes in the quantity of cultivated land and construction land, and the cultivated land tended to be transformed into construction land. The average land use conflict index increased by 0.07 from 1990 to 2020, which showed a spatial distribution of strong in the west and weak in the east, demonstrated by the encroachment of flat cultivated land, forest land, and grassland in the east. The decrease in the amount of arable land was mainly influenced by population density, while the expansion of construction land was more affected by population density and GDP. Land use conflicts were inseparable linked to the drastic conversion of land-use types. In areas where conflicts had intensified, the intensity of the increasing in construction land and the decreasing in cultivated were relatively large, and with the decreasing in cultivated and grassland, the increasing in construction land was active.
(2)It is our points that it is an inevitable choice for urban development to take into account the sustainable use of ecological land with large natural endowments and fragile cultivated land. The mitigation of land use conflicts in mountainous urban agglomerations needs to address the protection of ecological land with a flat terrain. The layout and construction of mountainous cities need to avoid the risk of fragmentation of cultivated and basic farmland. Harmonizing the high regional concentration of population and the objective pursuit of economic development is the key to alleviate the deterioration of conflict in plateau and mountain urban agglomerations.
This study can provide a basis and reference for the monitoring of land space dynamics in the central Yunnan urban agglomeration and for urban planning and sustainable land development in mountainous urban agglomerations.

参考文献/References:

[1] 田柳兰, 吕思雨, 毋兆鹏, 等. 乌鲁木齐市土地利用变化及其空间冲突测度[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2023, 35(4): 282-291. [TIAN Liulan, LYU Siyu, WU Zhaopeng, et al. Measurement of land use change and spatial conflict in Urumqi [J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2023, 35(4): 282-291] DOI: 10.6046/ zrzyyg.2022341
[2] 廖李红, 戴文远, 陈娟, 等. 平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(10): 1823-1833. [LIAO Lihong, DAI Wenyuan, CHEN Juan, et al. Spatial conflict between ecological-production-living spaces on Pingtan Island during rapid urbanization [J]. Resources Science, 2017, 39(10): 1823-1833] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2017.10.03
[3] WANG Meimei, JIANG Zizhen, LI Tengbiao, et al. Analysis on absolute conflict and relative conflict of land use in Xining metropolitan area under different scenarios in 2030 by PLUS and PFCI [J]. Cities, 2023, 137: 104314. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104314
[4] BROWN G, RAYMOND C M. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 122(1): 196-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007
[5] 周国华, 彭佳捷. 空间冲突的演变特征及影响效应——以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(6): 717-723. [ZHOU Guohua, PENG Jiajie. The evolution characteristics and influence effect of spatial conflict: A case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration [J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(6): 717-723] DOI: 10.13708/j.cnki.cn11-2640.2015.02.003
[6] CHITONGE H, MFUNE O. The urban land question in Africa: The case of urban land conflicts in the city of Lusaka, 100 years after its founding [J]. Habitat International, 2015, 48: 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.012
[7] 王健, 刘欣雨. 基于“风险—效应”的土地利用空间冲突识别与测度[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(12): 291-300. [WANG Jian, LIU Xinyu. Recognizing and measuring spatial conflict of land use via “risk-effect” [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(12): 291-300] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.12.033
[8] 田俊峰, 王彬燕, 王士君. 土地利用冲突研究的逻辑主线与内容框架[J]. 资源科学, 2023, 45(3): 465-479. [TIAN Junfeng, WANG Binyan, WANG Shijun. The paradigms and main content of land use conflict research [J]. Resources Science, 2023, 45(3): 465-479] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2023.03.01
[9] 于伯华, 吕昌河. 土地利用冲突分析: 概念与方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(3): 106-115. [YU Bohua, LYU Changhe. The progress and prospect of land use conflicts [J]. Progress in Geography, 2006, 25(3): 106-115] DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.03.013
[10] 王越, 李佩泽, 李炆颖, 等. 基于演化博弈的土地利用冲突缓解机制研究——以沈抚新区为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(12): 87-97. [WANG Yue, LI Peize, LI Wenying, et al. Mitigation mechanism of land use conflicts based on evolutionary game: A case study of Shenfu new area [J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(12): 87-97] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20211126.090825
[11] 周德, 徐建春, 王莉. 环杭州湾城市群土地利用的空间冲突与复杂性[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(9): 1630-1642. [ZHOU De, XU Jianchun, WANG Li. Land use spatial conflicts and complexity: A case study of the urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay, China [J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(9): 1630-1642] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201509003
[12] 韩博, 金晓斌, 孙瑞, 等. 基于冲突—适配视角的土地利用可持续性评价[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1763-1777. [HAN Bo, JIN Xiaobin, SUN Rui, et al. Land use sustainability evaluation based on conflict-adaptation perspective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(7): 1763-1777] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202107014
[13] 肖练练, 刘青青, 虞虎, 等. 基于土地利用冲突识别的国家公园社区调控研究——以钱江源国家公园为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20): 7277-7286. [XIAO Lianlian, LIU Qingqing, YU Hu, et al. Community regulation park based on land use conflict identification: A case study on Qianjingyuan National Park [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20): 7277-7286] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202005231314
[14] 蔡天雨, 徐磊, 陈亚恒, 等. 基于生态安全的青龙满族自治县土地利用冲突识别[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(5): 273-280. [CAI Tianyu, XU Lei, CHEN Yaheng, et al. Identification of land use conflicts in Qinglong Manchu Autonomous County based on ecological security [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(5): 273-280] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.05.036
[15] 钱凤魁, 王贺兴, 项子璇. 基于潜在土地利用冲突识别的主城区周边耕地保护[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(19): 267-275. [QIAN Fengkui, WANG Hexing, XIANG Zixuan. Cultivated land protection in the periphery of the main urban areas based on potential land use conflict identification [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(19): 267-275] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.19.031
[16] 唐凯, 周国华. 基于经济学视角的空间冲突形成原因及其风险测度——以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2013, 36(3): 90-94. [TANG Kai, ZHOU Guohua. Analysis of spatial conflict measurement based on the perspective of economics: A case study of Changzhutan areas [J]. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 2013, 36(3): 90-94]
[17] MA Wenqiu, JIANG Guanghui, CHEN Yunhao, et al. How feasible is regional integration for reconciling land use conflicts across the urban-rural interface? Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region in China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 92: 104433. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104433
[18] 王奥枫, 陈世恒, 韦彦章, 等. 基于F-H方法的漓江流域土地利用冲突识别[J]. 山地学报, 2021, 39(4): 506-514. [WANG Aofeng, CHEN Shiheng, WEI Yangzhang, et al. Land use conflict based on F-H method in the Lijiang River Basin, China [J]. Mountain Research, 2021, 39(4): 506-514] DOI: 10.16089/j. cnki.1008-2786.000615
[19] 李晨欣, 陈松林, 李晶, 等. 基于“三生”空间的土地利用冲突时空演变特征研究——以厦门、漳州和泉州城市群为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(3): 247-254. [LI Chenxin, CHEN Songlin, LI Jing, et al. Evolution of spatio-temporal characteristics of land use conflict based on productional-living-ecological space [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 42(3): 247-254] DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki. stbctb.2022.03.032
[20] 周德, 徐建春, 王莉. 近15年来中国土地利用冲突研究进展与展望 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(2): 21-29. [ZHOU De, XU Jianchun, WANG Li. Process of land use conflict research in China during the past fifteen years [J]. China Land Sciences, 2015, 29(2): 21-29] DOI: 10.13708/j.cnki.cn11-2640.2015.02.003
[21] 宋振江, 李争, 杨俊. 矿粮复合区土地利用冲突强度测算研究——以江西省德兴铜矿和永平铜矿污染区域为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(3): 78-85. [SONG Zhenjiang, LI Zheng, YANG Jun. Research on conflict intensity of land use conflicts in mine-grain mixed zone—take the contamination zone of Dexing copper mine and Yongping copper mine in Jiangxi province as an instance [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(3): 78-85] DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20180311
[22] 张潇, 谷人旭. 土地利用冲突的时空格局刻画与多情景模拟研究——以长江三角洲城市群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(5): 1311-1326. [ZHANG Xiao, GU Renxu. Spatio-temporal pattern and multi-scenario simulation of land use conflict: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(5): 1311-1326] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020210375
[23] ZOU Lilin, LIU Yansui, WANG Jianying, et al. An analysis of land use conflict potentials based on ecological-production-living function in the southeast coastal area of China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 122: 107297. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107297
[24] DENG Zhiwei, QUAN Bin. Intensity analysis to communicate detailed detection of land use and land cover change in Chang-Zhu-Tan metropolitan region, China [J]. Forests, 2023, 14(5): 939. DOI: 10.3390/f14050939
[25] 李帅呈, 龚健, 杨建新, 等. 兰西城市群土地利用/覆被变化模式特征: 基于强度分析框架[J]. 资源科学, 2023, 45(3): 480-493. [LI Shuaicheng, GONG Jian, YANG Jianxin, et al. Characteristics of LUCC patterns of the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration: Based on an intensity analysis framework [J]. Resources Science, 2023, 45(3): 480-493] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2023.03.02
[26] 牛乐乐, 张必成, 贾天忠, 等. 青海省海西州土地利用变化强度分析与稳定性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2): 152-159. [NIU Lele, ZHANG Bicheng, JIA Tianzhong, et al. Analysis on intensity and stability of land use change in Haixi Mongolian and Tibetan autonomous prefecture of Qinghai province [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(2): 152-159] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.02.021
[27] NYAMEKYE C, KWOFIE S, GHANSAH B, et al. Assessing urban growth in Ghana using machine learning and intensity analysis: A case study of the New Juaben Municipality [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 99: 105057. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105057
[28] MENG Xiaoyu, GAO Xin, LI Sen, et al. Monitoring desertification in Mongolia based on Landsat images and Google Earth Engine from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 129: 107908. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107908
[29] QUAN Bin, PONTIUS JR R G, SONG Hui. Intensity analysis to communicate land change during three time intervals in two regions of Quanzhou city, China [J]. GIScience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 57(1): 21-36. DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2019.1658420
[30] 李琛, 吴映梅, 高彬嫔. 滇中城市群城镇化与资源环境承载力耦合协调研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(2): 389-397. [LI Chen, WU Yingmei, GAO Binpin. Research on coupling and coordination of urbanization and resources and environmental carrying capacity in city agglomeration of central Yunnan [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(2): 389-397] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20210930.004
[31] 王永红, 鲁恒. 2001—2018 年云南省植被变化及驱动力[J]. 山地学报, 2022, 40(4): 531-541. [WANG Yonghong, LU Heng. Driving force of vegetation cover change in Yunnan province of China from 2001 to 2018 [J]. Mountain Research, 2022, 40(4): 531-541] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-786.000691
[32] 林伊琳, 赵俊三, 张萌, 等. 滇中城市群国土空间格局识别与时空演化特征分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(8): 176-191. [LIN Yilin, ZHAO Junsan, ZHANG Meng, et al. Dentification of territory space pattern and spatio-temporal evolution analysis of urban agglomeration in central Yunnan [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(8): 176-191] DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.08.020
[33] 林伊琳, 赵俊三, 陈国平, 等. 基于MCR-FLUS-Markov模型的区域国土空间格局优化[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(4): 159-170. [LIN Yilin, ZHAO Junsan, CHEN Guoping, et al. Optimization of regional territory space pattern based on MCR-FLUS-Markov model [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(4): 159-170] DOI: 10.6041 /j.issn.1000-1298.2021.04.017
[34] 朱加应, 彭双云. 近30年来滇中城市群生态用地变化轨迹时空演变特征及其驱动机制[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(1): 1-11. [ZHU Jiaying, PENG Shuangyun. Spatial-temporal characteristics and driving mechanism of ecological land change trajectories in central Yunnan urban agglomeration in recent 30 years [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 38(1): 1-11] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.01.017
[35] 刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010—2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 789-802. [LIU Jiyuan, NING Jia, KUANG Wenhui, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and characteristics of land use change in China during 2010-2015 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 789-802] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201805001
[36] 邓志位, 全斌, 祁剑青, 等. “三生”用地格局演变的强度分析及其驱动力——以衡阳市为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2023, 54(4): 768-780. [DENG Zhiwei, QUAN Bin, QI Jianqing, et al. Intensity analysis and driving forces of pattern evolution in productive-living-ecological land: A case study of Hengyang city [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2023, 54(4): 768-780] DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2022061405
[37] QUAN Bin, REN Hongge, PONTIUS JR R G, et al. Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns concerning land change in Changsha, China [J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2018, 14(2): 257-267. DOI: 10.1007/s11355-018-0349-y
[38] 王颖慧, 丁建丽, 李晓航, 等. 伊犁河流域土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务价值的影响——基于强度分析模型[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(8): 3106-3118. [WANG Yinghui, DING Jianli, LI Xiaohang, et al. Impact of LUCC on ecosystem services values in the Yili River Basin based on an intensity analysis model [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(8): 3106-3118] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202011202980
[39] 杨建新, 龚健, 高静, 等. 国家中心城市土地利用变化稳定性和系统性特征——以武汉市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(4): 701-716. [YANG Jianxin, GONG Jian, GAO Jing, et al. Stationary and systematic characteristics of land use and land cover change in the national central cities of China using intensity analysis: A case study of Wuhan city [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(4): 701-716] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2019.04.08
[40] 林素丽, 王枫. 基于PLUS模型并顾及交通规划的广州市土地利用情景模拟与分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(3): 557-569. [LIN Suli, WANG Feng. Simulation and analysis of land use scenarios in Guangzhou based on the PLUS model and traffic planning scenario [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2023, 40(3): 557-569] DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2022.0352
[41] 杨潋威, 赵娟, 朱家田, 等. 基于PLUS和InVEST模型的西安市生态系统碳储量时空变化与预测[J]. 自然资源遥感, 2022, 34(4): 175-182. [YANG Lianwei, ZHAO Juan, ZHU Jiatian, et al. Spatial-temporal change and prediction of carbon stock in the ecosystem of Xi'an based on PLUS and InVEST models [J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2022, 34(4): 175-182] DOI: 10.6046 /zrzyyg.2021348
[42] 邹利林, 刘彦随, 王永生. 中国土地利用冲突研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(2): 298-309. [ZOU Lilin, LIU Yansui, WANG Yongsheng. Research progress and prospect of land-use conflicts in China [J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(2): 298-309] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.02.011
[43] 蒙吉军, 江颂, 拉巴卓玛, 等. 基于景观格局的黑河中游土地利用冲突时空分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(9): 1553-1562. [MENG Jijun, JIANG Song, LABA Zhuoma, et al. The spatial and temporal analysis of land use conflict in the middle reaches of the Heihe River based on landscape pattern [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(9): 1553-1562] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.09.017
[44] TURNER K G, ODGAARD M V, BØCHER P K, et al. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 125(1): 89-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
[45] 云南省自然资源厅. 云南省土地利用总体规划(2006—2020年)[EB/OL].(2022-12-10)[2023-11-12]. http://dnr.yn.gov.cn/. [Department of Natural Resources of Yunnan Province. Overall plan for land use in Yunnan province(2006-2020)[EB/OL].(2022-12-10)[2023-11-12]. http://dnr.yn.gov.cn/]

相似文献/References:

[1]闵 婕,汪 洋*,刘 睿.三峡库区(重庆段)生态屏障带土地利用冲突演变特征分析[J].山地学报,2018,(02):334.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000329]
　MIN Jie,WANG Yang*,LIU Rui.Analysis on the Evolutionary Characteristics of Land Use Conflicts in the Ecological Barrier Zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area(Chongqing Section)[J].Mountain Research,2018,(2):334.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000329]
[2]王 权,李阳兵*.岩溶槽谷区地形起伏特征及其对景观格局的影响[J].山地学报,2019,(05):702.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000461]
　WANG Quan,LI Yangbing*.The Characteristics of Topographic Relief and Its Influence on Landscape Pattern in Karst Trough Valley Area[J].Mountain Research,2019,(2):702.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000461]
[3]汪 涛ab,陈亚梅ab,廖咏梅ab,等.1990—2020年西藏天然林分布与景观格局的动态变化[J].山地学报,2022,(5):682.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000703]
　WANG Taoab,CHEN Yameiab,LIAO Yongmeiab,et al.Dynamic Changes in the Distribution of Natural Forests in Tibet from 1990 to 2020 and Related Landscape Pattern Evolution[J].Mountain Research,2022,(2):682.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000703]
[4]叶 鑫,顾羊羊,林乃峰,等.自然保护区及周边的景观格局变化与驱动力分析——以贵州省兴义坡岗自然保护区为例[J].山地学报,2023,(1):68.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000731]
　YE Xin,GU Yangyang,LIN Naifeng,et al.Landscape Pattern Changes and Driving Forces of Nature Reserve and Its Surrounding Areas: A Case Study in the Xingyi Pogang Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China[J].Mountain Research,2023,(2):68.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000731]
[5]秦帮策,方维萱,邢再亮*,等.河北蔚县山间外流盆地景观格局稳定性[J].山地学报,2023,(6):846.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000792]
　QIN Bangce,FANG Weixuan,XING Zailiang*,et al.Landscape Pattern Stability of the Intermountain Open Basin in Yuxian County of China[J].Mountain Research,2023,(2):846.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000792]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2023-11-21; 改回日期(Accepted date):2024- 04-15
基金项目(Foundation item): 湖南省教育厅重点项目(17A067)。[Major Project of the Key Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education(17A067)]
作者简介(Biography): 周泽(1997-),男,云南曲靖人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:土地利用变化。[ZHOU Ze(1997-), male, born in Qujing, Yunnan province, M.Sc. candidate, research on land use change] E-mail: 1622015744@qq.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 全斌(1968-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向: GIS与土地利用变化。[QUAN Bin(1968-),male, Ph,D., professor, research on GIS and land use change]E-mail: quanbin308@aliyun.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-30