[1]石成华,李 奇,罗清虎,等.福建南平市洪涝灾害致损森林土壤种子库与地上植被及土壤性质的关系[J].山地学报,2024,(5):648-661.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000851]
　SHI Chenghua,LI Qi,LUO Qinghu,et al.Relationship between Damaged Soil Seed Bank and Aboveground Vegetation and Soil Properties in Post-Flooding Forests in Nanping City, Fujian Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2024,(5):648-661.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000851]
点击复制

福建南平市洪涝灾害致损森林土壤种子库与地上植被及土壤性质的关系
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第5期
页码:
648-661
栏目:
山地环境
出版日期:
2024-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relationship between Damaged Soil Seed Bank and Aboveground Vegetation and Soil Properties in Post-Flooding Forests in Nanping City, Fujian Province, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)5-648-14
作者:
石成华; 李 奇; 罗清虎;  过怡婷;  林勇明*
(福建农林大学 a. 菌草与生态学院; b. 福建省高校森林生态系统过程与经营重点实验室, 福州 350002)
Author(s):
SHI Chenghua;  LI Qi;  LUO Qinghu;  GUO Yiting;  LIN Yongming*
(a. College of Juncao Science and Ecology; b. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecosystem Process and Management of Fujian Province, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
关键词:
土壤种子库;  洪涝灾害;  土壤性质;  地上植被;  典范对应分析(CCA)
Keywords:
soil seed bank;  flooding disaster;  soil property;  aboveground vegetation;  canonical correspondence analysis(CCA)
分类号:
S718.5
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000851
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
土壤种子库是种子植物漫长进化历程中的一项生存策略。关于灾后土壤种子库的前期研究,多侧重于地震、火灾、荒漠化等灾后各阶段种子库特征、时空变化、萌发特性及其与植被恢复的关联。洪涝灾害对生态系统中土壤种子库的破坏影响长期且持续,导致种子存活与萌发能力受损,相关研究难度、周期和成本的增加,限制了洪涝灾害后生态系统中土壤种子库与地上植被及土壤因子的相关研究。本文以闽北森林的受损样地、自然恢复样地、未受损样地为研究对象,利用相关性和典范对应分析法分析不同恢复程度样地的土壤种子库、地上植被群落以及土壤理化性质。研究结果表明:(1)在不同恢复阶段中,未受损样地的Margalef丰富度指数、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Pielou均匀度指数均高于自然恢复样地与受损样地,Simpson优势度指数则最低; 自然恢复样地与受损样地土壤种子库的相似性最高,未受损样地与受损样地的相似性最低; 3种样地土壤种子库与地上植被的相似性均较低,但自然恢复样地相似性指数高于未受损样地及受损样地。(2)各样地土壤种子库密度与土壤因子的相关性存在差异,但其与多数因子间具有显著的相关关系。(3)土壤种子库物种分布与土壤因子的典范对应分析(Canonical Correspondence Analysis, CCA)表明,自然恢复样地对土壤种子库物种分布影响较大的环境因子依次为:土壤有机碳、全磷、速效钾、黏粒含量; 未受损样地的则为全钾、全磷、水解氮、速效钾以及土壤有机碳含量。未受损样地土壤种子库分布与土壤因子的排序效果更好,而自然恢复样地不理想。本研究可为预测受损森林的演变过程提供理论参考。
Abstract:
Soil seed bank is a survival strategy in the long evolutionary process of seed plants. Antecedent research on post-disaster soil seed banks primarily conducted on the characteristics, spatiotemporal changes, germination traits of seed banks, and their association with vegetation restoration at various stages after disasters such as earthquakes, fires, and desertification. Flood disasters had long-term and persistent destructive effects on soil seed banks, resulting in impairment of seed survival and germination potential in damaged ecosystems; unfortunately, less research achievements were made regarding post-flooding soil seed banks in relation to aboveground vegetation and soil factors.
In this study, the post-flooding(damaged)plots, naturally recovered plots and undisturbed plots in the forests of northern Fujian Province of China were established for field survey. Soil seed banks, vegetation community and soil physicochemical properties under different degrees of recovery were analyzed by correlation and canonical correspondence analysis(Canonical Correspondence Analysis, CCA)methods.
(1)At different stages of recovery, the Margalef richness index, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and Pielou evenness index were all higher in undisturbed plots than in naturally recovering and damaged plots, while the Simpson dominance index was the lowest in undisturbed plots. The soil seed banks in naturally recovered and damaged plots showed the highest similarity, while the similarity between undisturbed and damaged plots was lowest. The similarity between soil seed banks and aboveground vegetation was relatively low in the three types of plots, but the similarity index was higher in naturally recovering plots than in undisturbed and damaged plots.
(2)The correlation between soil seed bank density and soil factors varied with plots, but it was significantly correlated with most factors.
(3)By CCA, it suggested that in naturally recovering plots environmental factors had a comparable impact on soil seed bank species distribution in descending order: Total Organic Carbon(TOC), Total Phosphorus(TP), Available Potassium(AK), and clay content. For undisturbed plots, the factors were orderly sorted by Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen(TK), TP, Ammonia Nitrogen(AN), AK, and TOC content. The ordination effect of soil seed bank distribution with soil factors was better in undisturbed plots, but it was not ideal in naturally recovering plots.
This study can provide theoretical reference for prediction of evolutionary process of damaged forest communities.

参考文献/References:

[1] 常选选. 腾格里沙漠东南缘不同固沙年限人工柠条林土壤种子库动态研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2023: 1-50. [CHANG Xuanxuan. Soil seed bank dynamics in planted Caragana stands with different years of sand fixation at the southeastern edge of the Tengger Desert [D]. Yinchuan: Ninxia University, 2023: 1-50] DOI: 10.27257/d.cnki.gnxhc.2022.000915
[2] 王红利, 陈辅德, 李军辉. 小陇山林区土壤种子库物种组成与多样性[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2022(7): 67-69. [WANG Hongli, CHEN Fude, LI Junhui. Species composition and diversity of soil seed bank in Xiaolongshan forest area[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2022(7): 67-69] DOI: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2022.03.16.0002
[3] ANJU M V, WARRIER R R, KUNHIKANNAN C. Significance of soil seed bank in forest vegetation—a review[J]. Seeds, 2022, 1(3): 181-197. DOI: 10.3390/SEEDS1030016
[4] 李国旗, 邵文山, 赵盼盼, 等. 荒漠草原区4种植物群落土壤种子库特征及其土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(17): 6282-6292. [LI Guoqi, SHAO Wenshan, ZHAO Panpan, et al. Soil seed bank characteristics and soil physical and chemical properties of four plant communities in desert steppe area[J]. Acta Ecologic Sinica, 2019, 39(17): 6282-6292] DOI: 10.5846 /stxb201712112227
[5] 李国旗, 王雅芳, 刘星, 等. 贺兰山低山区土壤种子库空间分布特[J]. 西北植物学报, 2022, 42(2): 301-311. [LI Guoqi, WANG Yafang, LIU Xing, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil seed bank in low mountain area of Helan Mountain[J].Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2022, 42(2): 301-311] DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2022.02.0301
[6] 林勇明, 吴承祯, 洪伟, 等. 汶川地震灾区典型区不同植被类型土壤种子库特征——以北川县苏保河、魏家沟流域为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(1): 99-104. [LIN Yongming, WU Chengzhen, HONG Wei, et al. Characteristics of soil seed bank of different vegetation types in the typical area of Wenchuan earthquake disaster area-taking Subao River and Weijiagou River Basin in Beichuan County as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(1): 99-104] DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00099
[7] 李翠, 王庆海, 陈超, 等. 蔡家河湿地土壤种子库特征及其与地上植被和土壤因子的关系[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(3): 133-142. [LI Cui, WANG Qinghai, CHEN Chao, et al. Characteristics of soil seed bank in Caijiahe wetland and its relationship with aboveground vegetation and soil factors[J]. Ecological Science, 2019, 38(3):133-142] DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2019.03.016
[8] 刘瑞雪, 詹娟, 史志华, 等. 丹江口水库消落带土壤种子库与地上植被和环境的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(3): 801-808. [LIU Ruixue, ZHAN Juan, SHI Zhihua, et al. Relationship between soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation and environment in hydro-fluctuation belt of Danjiangkou reservoir[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(3): 801-808] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0237
[9] KU °ROVÁ J. The impact of soil properties and forest stand age on the soil seed bank[J]. Folia Geobotanica, 2016, 51(1): 27-37. DOI: 10.1007/s12224-016-9236-1
[10] ZHAO Yao, LI Meng, DENG Jiayong, et al. Afforestation affects soil seed banks by altering soil properties and understory plants on the eastern Loess Plateau, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 126: 107670. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107670
[11] MA Zhen, MA Miaojun, BASKIN J M, et al. Responses of alpine meadow seed bank and vegetation to nine consecutive years of soil fertilization[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 70(9): 92-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.04.009
[12] SMITH R S, SHIEL R S, MILLWARD D, et al. Soil seed banks and the effects of meadow management on vegetation change in a 10-year meadow field trial[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 39(2): 279-293. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00715.x
[13] 鞠艳, 杨星, 王轶虹, 等. 里下河地区极端降水时空变化及未来趋势分析[J]. 水文, 2023, 43(4): 104-110, 121. [JU Yan, YANG Xing, WANG Yihong, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics of extreme precipitation and its future trend analysis in the Lixia river plain[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2023, 43(4): 104-110, 121] DOI: 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852.20220220.
[14] 郭文莉. 洪涝灾害后升金湖优先恢复的水生植物物种组成和群落结构[D]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2022: 1-51. [GUO Wenli. Species composition and community structure of aquatic plants preferentially restored in Shengjin Lake after flood disaster[D]. Hefei: Anhui University, 2022: 1-51]
[15] 张劲峰. 滇西北亚高山退化森林生态系统特征及恢复对策研究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2012: 1-207. [ZHANG Jinfeng. Research on characteristics of degraded forest ecosystem and its restoration countermeasure in sub-alpine of Northwest Yunnan[D]. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2012: 1-207]
[16] 彭贤锋, 史常青, 赵廷宁, 等. 汶川地震不同次生地质灾害类型区土壤种子库特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(6): 192-197. [PENG Xianfeng, SHI Changqing, ZHAO Tingning, et al. Characteristics of soil seed bank in different secondary geological disaster areas of Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(6): 192-197] DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.06.042
[17] 梁琴. 林火对毕节岩溶山区土壤与种子萌发的生态效应及防火植物研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017: 1-93. [ LIANG Qin. Ecological effects of forest fires on soil and seed germination and fire-resistant plants in Bijie karst mountainous area[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017: 1-93]
[18] 马全林, 卢琦, 魏林源, 等. 干旱荒漠白刺灌丛植被演替过程土壤种子库变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(7): 2285-2294.[MA Quanlin, LU Qi, WEI Linyuan, et al. Changes of soil seed bank during vegetation succession of Nitraria tangutorum shrubland in arid desert[J]. Acta Ecologic Sinica, 2015, 35(7): 2285-2294] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306041326
[19] 于顺利, 蒋高明. 土壤种子库的研究进展及若干研究热点[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003(4): 552-560. [YU Shunli, JIANG Gaoming. The research development of soil seed bank and several hot topics[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2003(4): 552-560] DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2003.0080
[20] 罗清虎, 吴建召, 崔羽, 等. 洪涝灾害干扰下受损自然恢复林地土壤基本性状及分形维数特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(1): 29-37. [LUO Qinghu, WU Jianzhao, CUI Yu, et al. Soil basic properties and fractal dimension characteristics of damaged natural restoration forest land under flood disturbance[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(1): 29-37] DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.04032
[21] 李松阳, 余杭, 罗清虎, 等. 灾害干扰受损区自然恢复初期土壤物理性质的变化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(5): 162-168. [LI Songyang, YU Hang, LUO Qinghu, et al. Variation characteristics of soil physical properties in the early stage of natural restoration in disaster disturbed areas[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(5): 162-168] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.05.023
[22] 崔羽, 贺静雯, 刘颖, 等. 红壤区灾害受损不同林型恢复过程中土壤微生物群落对碳源的利用[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(4): 831-837. [CUI Yu, HE Jingwen, LIU Ying, et al. Utilization of carbon source by soil microbial community during restoration of different forest types in red soil region[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(4): 831-837] DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.12003
[23] 余杭, 罗清虎, 李松阳, 等. 灾害干扰受损森林土壤的碳、氮、磷初期恢复特征与变异性[J]. 山地学报, 2020, 38(4): 532-541. [YU Hang, LUO Qinghu, LI Songyang, et al. Early recovery characteristics and variability of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in forest soil disturbed by disaster[J]. Mountain Research, 2020, 38(4): 532-541] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000531
[24] 余坤勇, 刘健, 杨平, 等. 森林经营过程对区域发生滑坡的影响关系研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(4): 5-10, 16.[ YU Kunyong, LIU Jian, YANG Ping, et al. The impact of forest management forest management process on the landslide[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2016, 36(4): 5-10, 16] DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2016.04.002
[25] 李松阳, 余杭, 罗清虎, 等. 洪涝诱发灾害干扰下受损恢复林地土壤颗粒的组成变化特征及多重分形分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(8): 112-121. [LI Songyang, YU Hang, LUO Qinghu, et al. Changes in soil particle composition and multifractal analysis of damaged and restored forest land under flood-induced disaster disturbance[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(8): 112-121] DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190388
[26] 王伯荪, 张志权, 蓝崇钰, 等. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林取样技术研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1982(1): 51-61. [WANG Bosun, ZHANG Zhiquan, LAN Chongyu, et al. Studies on sampling techniques of the south-subtropical evergreen broad-leaf forest in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 1982(1): 51-61]
[27] 游水生, 王小明, 王海为. 福建中亚热带常绿阔叶林(米槠林)最小面积的确定[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2002(6): 438-442. [YOU Shuisheng, WANG Xiaoming, WANG Haiwei. Determination of the minimum sampling area for mid-subtropical evergreen broad-leaf forest(castanopsis carlesii forest)in Fujian Province, China[J]. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 2002(6): 438-442] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0837.2002.06.010.
[28] GRUBB P J. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche[J]. Biological Reviews. 1977, 52(1): 107-145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1977.tb01347.x
[29] 王东丽. 黄土丘陵沟壑区植物种子生活史策略及种子补播恢复研究[D]. 西安: 西北农林科技大学, 2014: 1-169. [WANG Dongli. Seed life-history strategies of plantss and restoration by seed addition in the hill-gully loess plateau region[D].Xi'an: Northwest A&F University, 2014: 1-169]
[30] 史军辉, 黄忠良, 欧阳学军, 等. 南亚热带森林土壤种子库与地上植被的组成特征及其关系[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(4): 26-31. [SHI Junhui, HUANG Zhongliang, OUYANG Xuejun, et al. Composition and relationship between soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation in subtropical forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006, 28(4): 26-31] DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2006.04.005
[31] 陈双双. 石漠化区樟树—马尾松人工混交林植物群落与土壤理化特征的研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2023: 1-78. [CHEN Shuangshuang. Plant communities and soil physicochemical characteristics of camphor-pinuss artificial mixed forests in rocky desertification areas[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2023: 1-78] DOI: 10.27662/d.cnki.gznlc.2022.000130
[32] 张天举, 陈永金, 刘加珍. 基于典范对应分析的滨海湿地土壤季节性盐渍化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 3322-3332. [ZHANG Tianju, CHEN Yongjin, LIU Jiazhen. Seasonal salinization characteristics of coastal wetland soil based on canonical correspondence analysis [J]. Acta Ecologic Sinica, 2019, 39(9): 3322-3332] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201806111305
[33] 徐海量, 李吉玫, 叶茂. 塔里木河下游不同地下水位下土壤种子库特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(3): 305-310. [XU Hailiang, LI Jimei, YE Mao. Characteristics of soil seed bank under different groundwater levels in the lower reaches of Tarim River[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(3): 305-310] DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2008.0108
[34] 左小安, 赵学勇, 赵哈林, 等. 科尔沁沙质草地群落物种多样性、生产力与土壤特性的关[J]. 环境科学, 2007(5): 945-951.[ZUO Xiaoan, ZHAO Xueyong, ZHAO Halin, et al. Relationship between species diversity, vigour and soil characteristics of sandy grassland communities in Horqin[J]. Environmental Science, 2007(5): 945-951] DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.2007.05.003
[35] 张广帅, 邓浩俊, 杜锟, 等. 汶川地震生态治理区土壤种子库及其与地上植被的关系[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(1): 69-79. [ZHANG Guangshuai, DENG Haojun, DU Kun, et al. Soil seed bank and its relationship with aboveground vegetation in Wenchuan earthquake ecological control area[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(1): 69-79] DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.141103
[36] 刘庆艳, 姜明, 吕宪国, 等. 湿地土壤种子库与地上植被相似性关系研究评述[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(24): 7465-7474. [LIU Qingyan, JIANG Ming, LYU Xianguo, et al. A review of similarity between soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation in wetlands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(24): 7465-7474] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201303120403
[37] 王昌辉. 长汀红壤侵蚀区不同恢复阶段种子雨种子库特征[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2020: 1-49. [WANG Changhui. Changting red soil erosion area characteristics of seed rain seed bank in different recovery stages[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2020: 1-49] DOI: 10.27018/d.cnki.gfjnu.2020.000664.
[38] 张继义, 赵哈林, 张铜会, 等. 科尔沁沙地植被恢复系列上群落演替与物种多样性的恢复动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004(1): 86-92. [ZHANG Jiyi, ZHAO Halin, ZHANG Tonghui, et al. Dynamics of species diversity of communities in restoration processes in Horqin sandy land[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2004(1): 86-92] DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2004.0013
[39] 高若允, 杨柳生, 罗清虎, 等. 洪涝灾害致损森林在自然恢复过程中的土壤种子库变化[J]. 山地学报, 2022, 40(2): 183-195. [GAO Ruoyun, YANG Liusheng, LUO Qinghu, et al. Variation of soil seed bank in natural restoration processes of different types of forests disturbed by floods[J]. Mountain Research, 2022, 40(2):183-195] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000664
[40] 张雪, 董文婧, 申仕康, 等. 湖滨带土壤种子库研究进展[J]. 湿地科学, 2016, 14(1): 97-102. [ZHANG Xue, DONG Wenjing, SHEN Shikang, et al. Studies on soil seed bank of lakeside zone: A review[J]. Wetland Science, 2016, 14(1): 97-102] DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2016.01.015
[41] 马金宝, 高凯, 孙忠林, 等. 科尔沁沙地4种生境地土壤种子库特征及其与土壤化学因子的关系[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(3): 65-68, 73. [MA Jinbao, GAO Kai, SUN Zhonglin, et al. Characteristics of soil seed bank in four habitats of Horqin sandy land and its relationship with soil chemical factors[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(3): 65-68, 73] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2022.03.017
[42] 张冰. 大同矿区煤矸石山土壤种子库研究[D]. 太原: 山西师范大学, 2016: 1-43. [ZHANG Bing. Study on soil seed bank of coal gangue mountain in Datong mining area[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Normal University, 2016: 1-43]
[43] WHITE E, TUCKER N, MEYERS N, et al. Seed dispersal to revegetated isolated rainforest patches in North Queensland[J]. Forest Ecology and Management. 2004, 192(2): 409-426. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.002
[44] 郝翠, 梁耀元, 孟伟庆, 等. 天津滨海新区自然湿地植物分布与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 湿地科学, 2009, 7(3): 266-272. [HAO Cui, LIANG Yaoyuan, MENG Weiqing, et al. Relationship between distribution of natural wetland plants and soil physical and chemical properties in Tianjin Binhai New Area[J]. Wetland Science, 2009, 7(3): 266-272] DOI: 10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2009.03.003
[45] 李佳奇, 李雨菲, 王晓静, 等. 桂北喀斯特石漠化地区不同植物群落土壤种子库特征及其与土壤养分关系[J]. 广西植物, 2023, 43(3): 452-462. [LI Jiaqi, LI Yufei, WANG Xiaojing, et al. Characteristics of soil seed banks of different plant communities and their relationships with soil nutrients in karst desertification area, North Guangxi, China[J]. Guihaia, 2023, 43(3): 452-462] DOI: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202208003
[46] 李吉玫, 徐海量. 塔里木河下游土壤种子库分布格局及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2009, 23(3): 88-93. [LI Jimei, XU Hailiang. Distribution pattern of soil seed bank and its relationship with environmental factors in the lower reaches of Tarim River [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(3): 88-93] DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2009.03.019
[47] 杨鹏, 何志, 胡军和, 等. 种子传播提高生物多样性的机制[J]. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(5): 1244-1253. [YANG Peng, HE Zhi, HU Junhe, et al. The mechanisms of seed dispersal in improving biodiversity [J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2023, 50(5): 1244-1253] DOI: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2023.2023004
[48] 刘静逸, 牛艳东, 郭克疾, 等. 南洞庭湖杨树清理迹地恢复初期土壤种子库特征及其与土壤因子的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 4042-4050. [LIU Jingyi, NIU Yandong, GUO Keji, et al. Characteristics of soil seed bank and its relationship with soil factors in the early stage of restoration of poplar clearing sites in South Dongting Lake[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(12): 4042-4050] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202012.005
[49] 翟付群, 许诺, 莫训强, 等. 天津蓟运河故道消落带土壤种子库特征与土壤理化性质分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(1): 97-102. [ZHAI Fuqun, XU Nuo, MO Xunqiang, et al. Analysis of soil seed bank characteristics and soil physical and chemical properties in hydro-fluctuation belt of Ji Canal in Tianjin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(1): 97-102] DOI: 10.13198/j.res.2013.01.101.zhaifq.002

相似文献/References:

[1]唐勇,曹敏,白昆甲.片断化热带雨林土壤种子库初步研究[J].山地学报,2000,(06):568.
[2]李阳兵,魏朝富,李先源,等.土地利用方式对岩溶山地土壤种子库的影响[J].山地学报,2002,(03):319.
[3]刘文胜,曹敏,唐勇.岷江上游毛榛、辽东栎灌丛及3种人工幼林土壤种子库的比较[J].山地学报,2003,(02):162.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2023-11- 07; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2024- 09- 03
基金项目(Foundation item): 福建省自然科学基金(2021J01060); 国家自然科学基金(42071132)[Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2021J01060); National Natural Science Foundation of China(42071132)]
作者简介(Biography): 石成华(1998-),男,甘肃武威人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:自然资源管理。[SHI Chenghua(1998-), male, born in Wuwei, Gansu Province, M.Sc. candidate, research on natural resources management] E-mail: 2181035335@qq.com。
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 林勇明(1982-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向:恢复生态学。[LIN Yongming(1982-), male, Ph.D., professor, research on restoration ecology] E-mail: monkey1422@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-30