[1]唐 勇,石 瑜,钟美玲.基于迁居意愿的震后重建区地方依恋差异性特征[J].山地学报,2024,(5):712-725.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000856]
　TANG Yong,SHI Yu,ZHONG Meiling.Differentiation of Place Attachmentfor Residents in Post-Earthquake Reconstruction Areas[J].Mountain Research,2024,(5):712-725.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000856]
点击复制

基于迁居意愿的震后重建区地方依恋差异性特征
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第5期
页码:
712-725
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2024-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Differentiation of Place Attachmentfor Residents in Post-Earthquake Reconstruction Areas
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)5-712-14
作者:
唐 勇1; 石 瑜1; 钟美玲2
(1. 成都理工大学 地理与规划学院,成都 610059; 2. 云南师范大学 地理学部,昆明 650500)
Author(s):
TANG Yong1;  SHI Yu1;  ZHONG Meiling2
(1. College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China; 2. Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China)
关键词:
迁居意愿;  地方依恋;  空间环境;  社区居民;  汶川地震
Keywords:
relocation intention;  place attachment;  residential settings;  communities;  Wenchuan Earthquake
分类号:
F590; G623.45
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000856
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
地震深刻改变了灾区人地关系,使得灾后重建区地方依恋问题备受关注。然而,基于迁居意愿视角的地方依恋争议与矛盾尚缺乏深入学术探讨与实证检验。本文以2008年汶川地震灾后重建区北川、汉旺、映秀等地居民为研究对象,采用便利抽样法,基于迁居意愿假设,开展一般性、社会性与物质性三个地方依恋维度的量化分析,旨在揭示家、社区和城镇尺度下地方依恋的维度与差异性特征。结果表明:(1)受访居民总体上表现出较强的空间环境地方依恋特征。(2)家的社会性依恋显著高于一般性依恋和物质性依恋。(3)家的物质性依恋、城镇的一般性依恋和物质性依恋存在明显的组间差异。研究结果聚焦地方尺度以及自我与他者的情感联结,为深入理解灾后重建区地方依恋的形成机制提供了实证支持,可为降低愤怒指数、促进不同尺度和类型灾后重建社区宜居空间环境建设提供参考。
Abstract:
Earthquakes heavily alter the man-earth relationship between residents and their living environment in shock-stricken regions of China, and the issue of place attachment to pre-disaster locale for them in post-shock reconstruction regions had received extensive attentions from home and abroad. However, cognitive debate or contractionary arguments about place attachment of inhabitants to pre-disaster locale regarding relocation willingness had not yet received in-depth academic discussion and practical validation.
In this study, it surveyed residents in counties such as Beichuan, Hanwang, and Yingxiu, which are part of the post-2008 Wenchuan Earthquake reconstruction regions, by a convenience sampling method. It hypothesized the willingness of the residents to relocate, and then introduced a quantitative evaluation of three dimensions of place attachment to general, social, and physical environment, aiming to reveal the dimensions and differential characteristics of the place attachment towards house, neighborhood, and city/town/county.
(1)The surveyed residents generally exhibited relatively strong inclination of place attachment towards their residential settings.
(2)Social attachment to the house was significantly stronger than general attachment and physical attachment if under the same scale.
(3)There were significant inter-group differences in physical attachment to house and general/physical attachment to city/town/county.
The findings were established on a local scale and the emotional connection between the self and others was elaborated, providing empirical support for a deeper understanding of the formation mechanism of place attachment in post-disaster reconstruction areas. And it can serve as a reference for reducing xenophobia and promoting the construction of livable environments in post-disaster reconstruction communities on various scales and types.

参考文献/References:

[1] 钱莉莉, 张捷, 郑春晖, 等. 灾难地居民集体记忆、地方认同、地方保护意愿关系研究——以汶川地震北川老县城为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(4): 988-1002. [QIAN Lili, ZHANG Jie, ZHENG Chunhui, et al. The relationships among post-disaster collective memory, place identity and place protection intention of local residents: A case study of Wenchuan earthquake ruined town of Beichuan [J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(4): 988-1002] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020180016
[2] 唐勇, 钟美玲, 王尧树, 等. 汶川地震黑色旅游地社区居民地方感聚类研究[J]. 旅游导刊, 2020, 4(6): 28-42. [TANG Yong, ZHONG Meiling, WANG Yaoshu, et al. A cluster analysis of the sense of place of local residents living in the dark tourism sites of Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2020, 4(6): 28-42] DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.145
[3] FOOTE K E. Shadowed ground: America's landscapes of violence and tragedy(2nd ed.)[M]. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2003: 82.
[4] LOWENTHAL D. Past time, present place: Landscape and memory [J]. Geographical Review, 1975, 65(1): 1-36. DOI: 10.2307/213831
[5] 唐勇, 王尧树, 傅滢滢, 等. 地震纪念性景观对震区地方感建构的影响研究[M]. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 2019: 15. [TANG Yong, WANG Yaoshu, FU Yingying, et al. Memorial landscapes of earthquake: Landscape perception and sense of place [M]. Chengdu: Sichuan University Press, 2019: 15]
[6] RYAN C, HSU S Y. Why do visitors go to museums? The case of 921 earthquake museum, Wufong, Taichung [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2011, 16(2): 209-228. DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2011.556342
[7] BIRAN A, LIU Wei, LI Gang, et al. Consuming post-disaster destinations: The case of Sichuan, China [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2014, 47: 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.03.004
[8] FAISAL A, ALBRECHT J N, COETZEE W J L.(Re)Creating spaces for tourism: Spatial effects of the 2010/2011 Christchurch earthquakes [J]. Tourism Management, 2020, 80: 104102. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104102
[9] WEARING S, BEIRMAN D, GRABOWSKI S. Engaging volunteer tourism in post-disaster recovery in Nepal [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2020, 80: 102802. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2019.102802
[10] 王金伟, 段冰杰. Dark Tourism学术研究: 进展与展望[J]. 旅游科学, 2021, 35(5): 81-103. [WANG Jinwei, DUAN Bingjie. Dark tourism research: Progress and prospect [J]. Tourism Science, 2021, 35(5): 81-103] DOI: 10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2021.05.006
[11] 郑春晖, 张捷. 自然灾难地居民风险知觉与旅游支持度的关系研究——以汶川大地震重灾区北川和都江堰为例[J]. 旅游导刊, 2020, 4(6): 43-58. [ZHENG Chunhui, ZHANG Jie. The relationship among residents' risk perception, place attachment and support for tourism in post-disaster tourism areas: A study of Beichuan county and Dujiangyan city [J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2020, 4(6): 43-58] DOI: 10.12054/lydk.bisu.148
[12] 朱竑, 刘博. 地方感、地方依恋与地方认同等概念的辨析及研究启示[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011(1): 1-8. [ZHU Hong, LIU Bo. Concepts analysis and research implications: Sense of place, place attachment and place identity [J]. Journal of South China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2011(1): 1-8]
[13] JORGENSEN B S, STEDMAN R C. A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2006, 79(3): 316-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.003
[14] WILLIAMS D R, STEWART S I. Sense of place: An elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management [J]. Journal of Forestry, 1998, 96(5): 18-23. DOI: 10.1093/jof/96.5.18
[15] BROWN G, RAYMOND C. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment [J]. Applied Geography, 2007, 27(2): 89-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.11.002
[16] PROSHANSKY H M, FABIAN A K, KAMINOFF R. Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1983, 3(1): 57-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8
[17] STEDMAN R C. Is it really just a social construction: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place [J]. Society and Natural Resources, 2003, 16(8): 671-685. DOI: 10.1080/08941920309189
[18] MANZO L C. Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, 23(1): 47-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9
[19] SOINI K, VAARALA H, POUTA E. Residents' sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 104(1): 124-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002
[20] HERNÁNDEZ B, HIDALGO M C, SALAZAR-LAPLACE M E, et al. Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007, 27(4): 310-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
[21] PROSHANSKY H M. The city and self-identity [J]. Environment and Behavior, 1978, 10(2): 147-169. DOI: 10.1177/0013916578102002
[22] LEWICKA M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2011, 31(3): 207-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
[23] SHAMAI S, ILATOV Z. Measuring sense of place: Methodological aspects [J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2005, 96(5): 467-476. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00479.x
[24] MCANDREW F T. The measurement of ‘rootedness' and the prediction of attachment to home-towns in college students [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1998, 18(4): 409-417. DOI: 10.1006/jevp.1998.0078
[25] HIDALGO M C, HERNáNDEZ B. Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001, 21(3): 273-281. DOI: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
[26] LEWICKA M. What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(1): 35-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.004
[27] SCANNELL L, GIFFORD R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
[28] HANNON B. Sense of place: Geographic discounting by people, animals and plants [J]. Ecological Economics, 1994, 10(2): 157-174. DOI: 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90006-X
[29] DEVINE-WRIGHT P, HOWES Y. Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(3): 271-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008
[30] TUAN Y. Landscape of fear [M]. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1979: 56.
[31] TUAN Y. Space and place: The perspective of experience [M]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1977: 149.
[32] YAMASHITA R. Relationship between citizens' risk perceptions formed by disaster information and migration decision-making: Evidence from Japan [J]. Progress in Disaster Science, 2020, 5: 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100056
[33] KWAN M P, DING Guoxiang. Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research [J]. The Professional Geographer, 2008, 60(4): 443-465. DOI: 10.1080/00330120802211752
[34] LEVISTON Z, DANDY J, HORWITZ P, et al. Anticipating environmental losses: Effects on place attachment and intentions to move [J]. Journal of Migration and Health, 2023, 7: 100152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100152
[35] REESE G, OETTLER L M S, KATZ L C. Imagining the loss of social and physical place characteristics reduces place attachment [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2019, 65: 101325. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101325
[36] STEIMANIS I, MAYER M, VOLLAN B. Why do people persist in sea-level rise threatened coastal regions? Empirical evidence on risk aversion and place attachment [J]. Climate Risk Management, 2021, 34: 100377. DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100377
[37] SWAPAN M S H, SADEQUE S. Place attachment in natural hazard-prone areas and decision to relocate: Research review and agenda for developing countries [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 52: 101937. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101937
[38] SHAKYA S, BASNET S, PAUDEL J. Natural disasters and labor migration: Evidence from Nepal's earthquake [J]. World Development, 2022, 151: 105748. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105748
[39] YAMASHITA R. Disaster risk and migration in the west bank of the Malay Peninsula: Will the urban-rural divide improve or widen? [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 78: 103150. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103150
[40] MUIR J A, COPE M R, ANGENINGSIH L R, et al. To move home or move on? Investigating the impact of recovery aid on migration status as a potential tool for disaster risk reduction in the aftermath of volcanic eruptions in Merapi, Indonesia [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 46: 101478. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101478
[41] SHELDON T L, ZHAN C. The impact of hurricanes and floods on domestic migration [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2022, 115: 102726. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102726
[42] BERCHIN I I, VALDUGA I B, GARCIA J, et al. Climate change and forced migrations: An effort towards recognizing climate refugees [J]. Geoforum, 2017, 84: 147-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.022
[43] NAVARRO O, MAMBET C, BARBARAS C, et al. Determinant factors of protective behaviors regarding erosion and coastal flooding risk [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 61: 102378. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102378.
[44] DOMINGUES R B, DE JESUS S N, FERREIRA O. Place attachment, risk perception, and preparedness in a population exposed to coastal hazards: A case study in Faro Beach, southern Portugal [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 60: 102288. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102288
[45] BECKER S O, FERRARA A. Consequences of forced migration: A survey of recent findings [J]. Labour Economics, 2019, 59: 1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2019.02.007
[46] BLACK R, ARNELL N W, ADGER W N, et al. Migration, immobility and displacement outcomes following extreme events [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2013, 27(S1): S32-S43. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.001
[47] MALLICK B, SULTANA Z, BENNETT C M. How do sustainable livelihoods influence environmental(non-)migration aspirations? [J]. Applied Geography, 2020, 124: 102328. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102328
[48] STRANDBERG C. Let's stay together – the mediating role of self-congruity and place attachment on residents' likelihood to stay [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2023, 87: 101989. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101989
[49] VAN DER STAR M E, HOCHSTENBACH C. Continuity among stayers: Levels, predictors and meanings of place attachment in rural shrinking regions [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022, 96: 369-380. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.010
[50] DE BACKER M. Between place and territory: Young people's emotional geographies of security and insecurity in Brussels' deprived areas [J]. Emotion, Space and Society, 2022, 45: 100911. DOI: 10.1016/j.emospa.2022.100911
[51] 兰竹虹, 张士斌, 严予若. 社区人文社会环境对汶川地震移民社会适应的影响——以北川县为例[J]. 人文地理, 2017, 32(4): 22-29. [LAN Zhuhong, ZHANG Shibin, YAN Yuruo. The influence of community humanities and social environment on social adaptation of Wenchuan earthquake migrants: A case study of Beichuan county [J]. Human Geography, 2017, 32(4): 22-29] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.04.004
[52] 王俊鸿, 董亮. 灾害移民返迁意愿及影响因素研究——以汶川地震异地安置羌族移民为例[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2013, 34(7): 8-14. [WANG Junhong, DONG Liang. The return intentions of the disaster immigrants and the influential factors: The case of relocated Qiang immigrants after Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University(Humanities and Social Science), 2013, 34(7): 8-14] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3926.2013.07.002
[53] DE DOMINICIS S, FORNARA F, CANCELLIERI U G, et al. We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, 43: 66-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010
[54] MA Zhixing, GUO Shili, DENG Xin, et al. Place attachment, community trust, and farmer's community participation: Evidence from the hardest-hit areas of Sichuan, China [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 73: 102892. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102892
[55] 夏少琼. 冲击与延续——汶川大地震后灾难移民动因的思考[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 35(10): 9-14. [XIA Shaoqiong. Shock and continuation: The motivations of migration after Wenchuan earthquake [J]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University(Humanities and Social Science), 2014, 35(10): 9-14] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3926.2014.10.002
[56] LIU Yuzhen. Decisions to leave home: An examination of rural married women's labour migration in contemporary China [J]. Women's Studies International Forum, 2012, 35(5): 305-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2012.06.001
[57] CORBETT M. I'm going to make sure I'm ready before I leave: The complexity of educational and mobility decision-making in a Canadian coastal community [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2013, 32: 275-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.07.006
[58] RAUHUT D, LITTKE H. ‘A one way ticket to the city, please!' on young women leaving the Swedish peripheral region Västernorrland [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 43: 301-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.05.003
[59] OUATTARA B, STROBL E. Hurricane strikes and local migration in US coastal counties [J]. Economics Letters, 2014, 124(1): 17-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.03.025
[60] BOBOC C, VASILE V, TODOSE D. Vulnerabilities associated to migration trajectories from Romania to EU countries [J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 62: 352-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.056
[61] 李华, 刘敏. 恐惧景观及其在旅游地理学中的应用综述[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(4): 642-658. [LI Hua, LIU Min. Review of the landscape of fear and its application in tourism geography [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(4): 642-658] DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003465
[62] 李华, 刘敏. 黑色旅游与恐惧景观的关系探究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(12): 140-150. [LI Hua, LIU Min. An exploration of the relationship between dark tourism and landscape of fear [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(12): 140-150] DOI: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.12.015
[63] 梁璐, 代莉, 田嘉申, 等. 情感地理学视角下纪念性恐惧景观地游客体验特征分析——以5·12汶川特大地震纪念馆为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 48(6): 884-892. [LIANG Lu, DAI Li, TIAN Jiashen, et al. The characteristics of tourist experience in memorial landscapes of fear from the perspective of emotional geography: The case of 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake Memorial Museum [J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 48(6): 884-892] DOI: 10.16152 /j.cnki.xdxbzr.2018-06-016
[64] 王金伟, 李冰洁. 恐惧景观地旅游中的主客凝视行为研究——以北京朝内81号为例[J].旅游学刊, 2021, 36(5): 130-148. [WANG Jinwei, LI Bingjie. Host and guest gaze in a landscape of fear: A case study of Chaonei No. 81 in Beijing, China [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(5): 130-148] DOI: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.05.014
[65] RELPH E. Place and placelessness [M]. London: Pion Ltd., 1976: 80.
[66] WANG Suosheng. Residents' perception of communities-based disaster tourism: The case of Yinxiu, China [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2019, 24(7): 669-678. DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2019.1623273
[67] YAN Bingjin, ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Honglei, et al. Investigating the motivation–experience relationship in a dark tourism space: A case study of the Beichuan earthquake relics, China [J]. Tourism Management, 2016, 53: 108-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.014
[68] 唐勇, 向凌潇,钟美玲, 等. 汶川地震纪念地黑色旅游动机、游憩价值与重游意愿认知结构关系研究[J]. 山地学报, 2018, 36(3): 422-431. [TANG Yong, XIANG Lingxiao, ZHONG Meiling, et al. Dark touristic motivations, recreational value and revisit intention to the memorial sites of Wenchuan earthquake: A structural modeling approach [J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(3): 422-431] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.008-278.000338
[69] 薛熙明, 封丹. 变动中的家与地方: 一个关联性的研究综述[J]. 人文地理, 2016, 31(4): 9-16. [XUE Ximing, FENG Dan. Home and place in a changing world: A related review [J]. Human Geography, 2016, 31(4): 9-16] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.04.002
[70] 钱莉莉, 张捷, 郑春晖, 等. 基于集体记忆的震后北川老县城空间重构[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(6): 53-61. [QIAN Lili, ZHANG Jie, ZHENG Chunhui, et al. Spatial reconstruction of Beichuan ruined country town post-earthquake based on collective memory theory [J]. Human Geography, 2018, 33(6): 53-61] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.06.007
[71] CHUMKY T, BASU M, ONITSUKA K, et al. The current research landscape of disaster-induced migration: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2022, 74: 102931. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102931
[72] WANG Jinwei, LUO Xianrong. Resident perception of dark tourism impact: The case of Beichuan County, China [J]. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 2018, 16(5): 463-481. DOI: 10.1080/14766825.2017.1345918
[73] 王金伟, 谢伶, 张赛茵. 自然灾难地黑色旅游发展:居民感知与社区参与——以北川羌族自治县吉娜羌寨为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(11): 101-114. [WANG Jinwei, XIE Ling, ZHANG Saiyin. Residents' perceptions and participation in dark tourism on natural disaster site: A case study of Jina Qiang Stockaded village, China [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(11): 101-114] DOI: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2020.00.001
[74] QIAN Lili, ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Honglei, et al. Hit close to home: The moderating effects of past experiences on tourists' on-site experiences and behavioral intention in post-earthquake site [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2017, 22(9): 936-950. DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2017.1362019
[75] ZHENG Chunhui, ZHANG Jie, GUO Yongrui, et al. Disruption and reestablishment of place attachment after large-scale disasters: The role of perceived risk, negative emotions, and coping [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2019, 40: 101273. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101273
[76] BONAIUTO M, ALVES S, DE DOMINICIS S, et al. Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research review and agenda [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, 48: 33-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.007

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2024- 04-12; 改回日期(Accepted date):2024-10-21
基金项目(Foundation item): 教育部国家留学基金(202308510143); 四川省社会科学研究“十三五”2016年度项目(SC16B006)。[China Scholarship Council(202308510143); 2016 Sichuan Social Science Research Program(SC16B006)]
作者简介(Biography): 唐勇,男,四川成都人,博士,教授,主要研究方向:行为地理学。[TANG Yong(1979-), male, born in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, Ph.D., professor, research on behavioral geography] E-mail: tangyong@cdut.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-30