[1]黄群英,吴诗茵,韦振锋*,等.广西边境山区生态服务价值与农户生计耦合分析及生态补偿研究[J].山地学报,2025,(1):72-86.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000877]
　HUANG Qunying,WU Shiyin,WEI Zhenfeng*,et al.Analysis on Coupling between Ecological Service Value and Farmers’ Livelihood in Mountainous Border Areas of Guangxi, China and Associated Ecological Compensation[J].Mountain Research,2025,(1):72-86.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000877]
点击复制

广西边境山区生态服务价值与农户生计耦合分析及生态补偿研究()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2025年第1期
页码:
72-86
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2025-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on Coupling between Ecological Service Value and Farmers’ Livelihood in Mountainous Border Areas of Guangxi, China and Associated Ecological Compensation
文章编号:
1008-2786-(20251-072-15)
作者:
黄群英1; 吴诗茵1; 韦振锋1; 2*; 温 雪1
(1.广西财经学院 经济与贸易学院,南宁 530000; 2.广西金融与经济研究院,南宁 530000)
Author(s):
HUANG Qunying1;  WU Shiyin1;  WEI Zhenfeng1; 2*;  WEN Xue1
(1. Economic and Trade College, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530000, China; 2. Guangxi Institute of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530000, China)
关键词:
生态系统服务价值;  农户生计;  生态补偿;  广西边境地区
Keywords:
ecosystem service value;  farmers’ livelihood;  ecological compensation;  Guangxi border area
分类号:
F205
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000877
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
边境山区生态-经济-社会系统呈现强关联性、动态敏感性和跨境传导性,生态屏障功能衰退与生计空间重构的冲突已成为制约区域可持续发展的关键瓶颈。针对现有研究在跨学科整合与空间关联分析方面的不足,本研究以广西边境地区为例,采用生态当量因子法、生态耦合模型和生态补偿的方法,分析2004—2021年生态系统服务价值演变规律,探生计-生态耦合机理及补偿政策实施效应。结果表明:(1)广西边境山区生态系统服务价值呈上升趋势,从2004年的447.10亿元提高至2021年的521.56亿元,其中林地贡献率达52.64%,反映出森林作为“生态服务综合载体”的主导地位。(2)区域生计-生态耦合系统多为低度和中度耦合,呈现“低度(37.5%)—中度(62.5%)”的梯度协调演进特征,协调度年均提升29.28%,但空间差异明显。口岸城市(东兴市)因跨境贸易驱动引发生计策略转型,导致生态服务供需结构性失衡,呈现中度失调,农户生计与生态环境协同不足。(3)生态补偿总量呈“385.63亿元—202.60亿元”的阶梯递减趋势,那坡县-宁明县处于生态补偿优先区,其他县份相对较低,生态补偿政策的空间配置差异是补偿效率衰减的关键因素。本研究可为广西边境地区的生态建设及生计振兴政策的制定和实施提供科学依据,为促进边境地区人地协同可持续发展分区管控提供决策参考。
Abstract:
China’s mountainous borderlands, characterized by geopolitical sensitivities, coexisting ecological fragility and biocultural diversity, peripheral economies with transboundary dependencies, and multi-ethnic cultural landscapes, form a coupled human-natural system where the degradation of ecological barriers and livelihood space reconfiguration creates a critical paradox for sustainable territorial governance. Resolving the “ecology-livelihood-development nexus” in these transitional zones requires a complexity-driven framework to advance precision rural revitalization, adaptive landscape stewardship, and cross-scale compensation mechanisms that address trans-jurisdictional externalities.
In this study, it took the border regions of Guangxi Province, China as an example, employing the ecological equivalent factor method, ecological coupling models, and ecological compensation methods to analyze the evolution of ecosystem service value from 2004 to 2021 and explore livelihood-ecological coupling mechanisms and the implementation effects of compensation policies.
(1)The total ESV in mountainous border areas of Guangxi showed an upward trend, increasing from 44.71 billion CNY in 2004 to 52.156 billion CNY in 2021. Forest ecosystems contributed 52.64% of this value, underscoring forests’ dominant role as integrated carriers of ecological services.
(2)The regional livelihood-ecosystem coupling system predominantly exhibited low to moderate coupling levels, demonstrating a gradient coordination evolution from low(37.5%)to moderate(62.5%). The coordination degree increased annually by 29.28%, yet significant spatial disparities persisted. In port cities(Dongxing and Pingxiang), livelihood strategy transitions driven by cross-border trade led to structural imbalances in ecosystem service supply-demand, manifesting as moderate dysfunction spatial distribution is uneven and insufficient synergy between livelihoods and ecological environments.
(3)Total amount of ecological compensation had a stepwise decline from 38.563 billion CNY to 20.26 billion CNY. Napo and Ningming counties were identified as priority compensation zones, while other counties were lower demand. Spatial allocation disparities in compensation policies emerged as the key driver of efficiency attenuation.
This research provides scientific evidence for formulating ecological construction and livelihood revitalization policies in Guangxi border areas, while offering decision-making references for spatially differentiated sustainable development governance.

参考文献/References:

[1] 米丹丹, 斯琴朝克图, 乌兰图雅, 等. 蒙东地区乡村聚落空间演变特征及其影响因素[J]. 山地学报, 2023, 41(6): 863-878. [MI Dandan, SIQIN Chaoketu, WULAN Tuya, et al. Spatial evolution and influencing factors of rural settlements in eastern Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Mountain Research, 2023, 41(6): 863-878]DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000793
[2] 王新菲. 森林恢复背景下三峡库区生态系统服务与农户生计的关联特征[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2022: 1-88. [WANG Xinfei. Relationships between ecosystem services and farmers’ livelihoods in the Three Gorges Reservoir area under forest restoration [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2022: 1-88] DOI: 10.27158/d.cnki.ghznu.2022.000492
[3] CINNER J E, MCCLANAHAN T R, GRAHAM N A J, et al. Vulnerability of coastal communities to key impacts of climate change on coral reef fisheries [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(1): 12-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.018
[4] 王茹, 张先平, 张晓玲, 等. 2000-2020年山西省宁武县生态系统服务价值时空动态研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2024, 39(1): 264-272.[WANG Ru, ZHANG Xianping, ZHANG Xiaoling, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem service value in Ningwu County, Shanxi Province from 2000 to 2020 [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2024, 39(1): 264-272] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2024.01.35
[5] 叶文丽, 王银, 杨晴青, 等. 黄土高原农户生计脆弱性与生态退化的空间关系——以陕西省佳县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(17): 7577-7588. [YE Wenli, WANG Yin, YANG Qingqing, et al. Spatial relationship between livelihoods vulnerability and habitat degradation on the Loess Plateau: A case study of Jiaxian County, Shaanxi Province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(17): 7577-7588] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202309192015
[6] 程玉恒, 乔伟峰, 何天祺, 等. 南京市高淳区村域尺度土地利用功能变化及生态系统服务价值响应研究[J]. 地理科学, 2024, 44(2): 340-350. [CHENG Yuheng, QIAO Weifeng, HE Tianqi, et al. Response of ecosystem services value to land use function change at the village scale in Gaochun District, Nanjing [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2024, 44(2): 340-350] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.20220938
[7] YANG Renfei, REN Fu, XU Wenxuan, et al. China’s ecosystem service value in 1992–2018: Pattern and anthropogenic driving factors detection using Bayesian spatiotemporal hierarchy model [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 302: 114089. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114089
[8] 许译方, 周永杰, 何煜然, 等. 基于土地利用变化的粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务价值预测研究[J]. 生态科学, 2020, 39(1): 207-212. [XU Yifang, ZHOU Yongjie, HE Yuran, et al. Study on the prediction of ecological system service values based on the changes of land use in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area [J]. Ecological Science, 2020, 39(1): 207-212] DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2020.01.026
[9] 钱大文, 曹广民, 杜岩功, 等. 2000—2015年祁连山南坡生态系统服务价值时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4): 1392-1404. [QIAN Dawen, CAO Guangmin, DU Yangong, et al. Spatial-temporal dynamics of ecosystem service value in the southern slope of Qilian Mountain from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 1392-1404] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201811292598
[10] SCHETKE S, LEE H, GRAF W, et al. Application of the ecosystem service concept for climate protection in Germany [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 29: 294-305] DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.017
[11] SELIVANOV E, HLAVACKOVA P. Methods for monetary valuation of ecosystem services: A scoping review [J]. Journal of Forest Science, 2021, 67(11): 499-511. DOI: 10.17221/96/2021-JFS
[12] DE GROOT R, BRANDER L, VAN DER PLOEG S, et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1(1): 50-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
[13] 潘鹤思, 李英, 陈振环. 森林生态系统服务价值评估方法研究综述及展望[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(6): 1003-7578. [PAN Hensi, LI Ying, CHEN Zhenhuan. A review and perspectives on the methods for evaluation of forest ecosystem service values [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(6): 1003-7578] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2018.175
[14] 阿如娜, 高红贵, 金良. 生计资本对农牧户绿色生产行为的影响研究——基于内蒙古半农半牧区农牧户调查数据[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2024: 2096-4188. [A Runa, GAO Honggui, JIN Liang. Effects of livelihood capital on green production behaviour of farmers and herdsmen: Based on the survey data of farmers and herdsmen in semi-agricultural and semi-pastoral areas of Inner Mongolia [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2024: 2096-4188]
[15] KUANG Foyuan, JIN Jianjun, HE Rui, et al. Influence of livelihood capital on adaptation strategies: Evidence from rural households in Wushen Banner, China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 89: 104228. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104228
[16] DAS M, DAS A, MOMIN S, et al. Mapping the effect of climate change on community livelihood vulnerability in the riparian region of Gangatic Plain, India [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 119: 106815. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106815
[17] 叶文丽, 王银, 吴孔森, 等. 黄土高原农户生计转型及其生态效应——以陕西省佳县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(6): 2323-2335. [YE Wenli, WANG Yin, WU Kongsen, et al. Livelihood transformation of farmers’ livelilhood transition and ecological effects on Loess Plateau: A case study of Jiaxian County, Shaanxi Province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(6): 2323-2335] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202203280766
[18] 李树淼. 滇西北地区生态系统服务价值的影响因素研究[D]. 昆明: 云南财经大学, 2024: 1-58. [LI Shumiao. Study on the factors influencing of the value of ecosystem services in northwest Yunnan [D]. Kunming: Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2024: 1- 58] DOI: 10.27455/d.cnki.gycmc.2023.000046
[19] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254. [XIE Gaodi, ZHANG Caixia, ZHANG Leiming, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254] DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001
[20] 马随随, 张华兵, 王清. 生态系统服务与农户生计的时空耦合关系研究——以里下河地区为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(3): 79-88. [MA Suisui, ZHANG Huabing, WANG Qing. Study on spatio-temporal characteristics of the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and farmers’ livelihood: A case study of Lixia River region [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(3): 79-88]DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20230309
[21] 王女杰, 刘建, 吴大千, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿——以山东省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6646-6653. [WANG Nujie, LIU Jian, WU Daqian, et al. Regional eco-compensation based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study of Shandong Province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6646-6653] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.2010.23.038
[22] 谢高地. 生态资产评价: 存量、质量与价值[J]. 环境保护, 2017, 45(11): 18-22. [XIE Gaodi. Ecological asset evaluation: Stock, quality and value. Environmental Protection, 2017, 45(11): 18-22]DOI: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2017.11.003.
[23] 危小建, 辛思怡, 张颖艺, 等. 不同格网尺度下生态系统服务价值空间分异及其影响因素差异——以大南昌都市圈为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(18): 7585-7597. [WEI Xiaojian, XIN Siyi, ZHANG Caixiang, et al. Spatial difference of ecological services and its influencing factors under different scales: Taking the Nanchang Urban Agglomeration as an example. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(18): 7585-7597]DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202203310811.
[24] 王小兰, 余珂, 侯兰功. 岷江上游农户生计资本与生计稳定性耦合协调分析[J]. 西安理工大学学报, 2024, 40(4): 562-573. [WANG Xiaolan, YU Ke, HOU Langong. Coupling and coordination analysis of livelihood capital and livelihood stability of farmers in the upper reaches of the Min River, China [J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Technology, 2024, 40(4): 562-573] DOI: 10.19322/j.cnki.issn.1006-4710.2024.04.013
[25] 郝峻锋. 云南省农户生计资本时空演变及耦合协调研究[J]. 安徽乡村振兴研究, 2023(6): 92-107. [HAO Junfeng. Study on spatial-temporal evolution and coupling coordination of livelihood capital of rural residents in Yunnan Province [J]. Agricultural Revitalization Research in Anhui, 2023(6): 92-107] DOI: 10.13454/j.issn.2097-1931.2023.06.009
[26] 孙彦, 赵雪雁. 山区农户的生计干预效率及其影响因素——以陇南山区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(7): 1874-1891. [SUN Yan, ZHAO Xueyan. Efficiency and influencing factors of livelihood interventions of farming households in mountainous areas: A case study of Longnan mountainous areas [J]. Geography Research, 2023, 42(7): 1874-1891] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020220867
[27] 高伟, 李欣悦, 张远, 等. 长江流域生态系统服务价值时空演变与预测[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(15): 6203-6211. [GAO Wei, LI Xinyue, ZHANG Yuan, et al. Evolution and prediction of ecosystem service value of the Yangtze River Basin [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(15): 6203-6211] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202104221062
[28] 杨磊, 刘凤莲. 昆明市生态系统服务价值时空演变及驱动因素研究[J]. 国土资源导刊, 2023, 20(4): 125-136. [YANG Lei, LIU Fenglian. Study on spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem service value in Kunming prefecture [J]. Land and Resources Herald, 2023, 20(4): 125-136]
[29] 王檬. 秦巴山区土地生态系统服务价值及其时空演变研究[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2022: 1-81. [WANG Meng. The research on the service value of land ecosystem and its spatio-temporal evolution in Qinba Mountain area [D]. Chengdu: Sichuan University, 2022: 1-81] DOI: 10.27342/d.cnki.gscdu.2021.000475
[30] 曹倡景, 张璐, 梁通, 等. 黄河砒砂岩区土地利用生态系统服务价值响应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(5): 337-343. [CAO Changjing, ZHANG Lu, LIANG Tong, et al. Response to the value of land use ecosystem services in the sandstone area of the Yellow River [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conversation, 2024, 31(5): 337-343] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.036
[31] 梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 等. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779. [LIANG Shihao, LI Wen, GAO Yu, et al. Correlations between ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk and its spatial heterogeneity in Jilin Province, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(3): 769-779] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202403.022
[32] 周建伟, 罗君, 马雪洋. 拉萨河流域土地利用与生态系统服务价值时空演变及驱动因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(6): 1021-1031. [ZHOU Jianwei, LUO Jun, MA Xueyang. Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of land use and ecosystem service value in Lhasa River Basin, China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(6): 1021-1031] DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2024.06.11
[33] 蒙子钰, 卢远, 汤传勇, 等. 欠发达山区农户生计恢复力测度——以广西凤山县为例[J]. 山地学报, 2023, 41(4): 584-596. [MENG Ziyu, LU Yuan, TANG Chuanyong, et al. Measurement of the livelihood resilience of farmers in underdeveloped mountainous areas: A case study of Fengshan County, Guangxi, China [J]. Mountain Research, 2023, 41(4): 584-596] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000772
[34] 高振斌, 王小莉, 苏婧, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值评估的东江流域生态补偿研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(6): 563-570. [GAO Zhenbin, WANG Xiaoli, SU Jing, et al. Ecological compensation of Dongjiang River Basin based on evaluation of ecosystem service value [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(6): 563-570] DOI: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2018.06.012
[35] 李佳桐, 唐海萍, 邝佛缘. 国家公园生态系统服务与农牧户福祉的时空耦合分析——以祁连山国家公园为例[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(15): 6527-6539. [LI Jiatong, TANG Haiping, KUANG Foyuan. Spatial-temporal coupling analysis of ecosystem services and well-being of farmers and herdsmen: A case study of Qilian Mountain National Park [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(15): 6527-6539] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202310072154
[36] SANTOS-MARTIN F, ZORRILLA-MIRAS P, PALOMO I, et al. Protecting nature is necessary but not sufficient for conserving ecosystem services: A comprehensive assessment along a gradient of land-use intensity in Spain [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 35: 43-51] DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.11.006
[37] 王丹, 兰安军, 范泽孟, 等. 典型喀斯特区域土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的响应情景模拟[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(4): 308-315+325. [WANG Dan, LAN Anjun, FAN Zemeng, et al. Scenario modeling of response of land use change to ecosystem service values in a typical karst region [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 31(4): 308-315+325]DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.036
[38] 何江润, 吴艳艳, 吴志峰. 粤港澳大湾区湿地生态系统服务及价值评估研究进展及展望[J]. 生态科学, 2024, 43(2): 271-280. [HE Jiangrun, WU Yanyan, WU Zhifeng. Research progress and prospects of wetland ecosystem services and value assessment in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Ecological Science, 2024, 43(2): 271-280] DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2024.02.030
[39] 唐秀美, 刘敏, 吴悠, 等. 国土综合整治与生态修复对区域生态系统服务价值的影响评估[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(14): 5974-5984. [TANG Xiumei, LIU Min, WU You, et al. Impacts of comprehensive consolidation and ecological restoration of land space on ecosystem service value [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2024, 44(14): 5974-5984] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202310102185
[40] 张婕, 古明敏, 王陈. 基于共享视角的黄河流域综合生态补偿机制[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, 34(3): 192-204. [ZHANG Jie, GU Mingmin, WANG Chen. Comprehensive ecological compensation mechanisms of the Yellow River Basin from the sharing perspective [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2024, 34(3): 192-204] DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20230341
[41] 赵晶晶, 葛颜祥, 李颖. 协同引擎、外部环境与流域生态补偿多主体协同行为研究——以山东省大汶河流域为例[J]. 中国环境管理, 2023, 15(4): 130-139. [ZHAO Jingjing, GE Yanxiang, LI Ying. Research on multi-agent collaboration behavior of collaboration engine, external environment and watershed eco-compensation: A case study of Dawen River Basin in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Environmental Management, 2023, 15(4): 130-139] DOI: 10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2023.04.130
[42] 许信. 基于生态系统调节服务价值评估的生态补偿标准研究——以鄱阳湖地区为例[D]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2023: 1-51. [XU Xin. Ecological compensation based on the assessment of the value of ecosystem regulation services standard study-taking the Poyang Lake region as an example [D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2024: 1-51] DOI: 10.27175/d.cnki.gjxcu.2023.000642
[43] 肖建英, 戴津津, 方昕然, 等. 基于PLUS模型的徐州市生态系统服务价值多情景模拟研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2024, 38(4): 125-134. [XIAO Jianying, DAI Jinjin, FANG Xinran, et al. Multiple scenario simulation of ecosystem service value in Xuzhou City based on PLUS model [J]. China Land Science, 2002, 38(4): 125-134] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20240320.171338

相似文献/References:

[1]于淑会a,b,等.基于生态补偿分析的山区“造血式”补偿模式探讨——以太行山河北段为例[J].山地学报,2021,(6):879.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000646]
　YU Shuhuiab,YAN Qiuyuab,DENG Wei*,et al.A “Hematopoietic Ecological Compensation” Mode Appliable to the Hebei Sections of the Taihang Mountain Area, China[J].Mountain Research,2021,(1):879.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000646]
[2]曹 辉,吴慧珍.武夷山国家公园生态系统服务价值时空变化及权衡协同[J].山地学报,2024,(5):685.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000854]
　CAO Hui,WU Huizhen.Spatial-Temporal Changes of Ecosystem Service Value with Trade-offs/Synergy in Wuyishan National Park, China[J].Mountain Research,2024,(1):685.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000854]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2024- 08-21; 改回日期(Accepted date):2025- 02- 03
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家自然科学基金(72364001,72363001):广西财经学院经济与贸易学院学科项目(2024XKA03)[National Natural Science Foundation Project(72364001, 72363001); Academic Projects of School of Economics and Trade, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics(2024XKA03)]
作者简介(Biography): 黄群英(1983-),女,湖南南县人,博士研究生,主要研究方向:生态环境评价。[HUANG Qunying(1983-), female, born in Nanxian,Hunan Province, Ph.D. candidate, research on ecological and environmental assessment] E-mail: 0314300133@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 韦振锋(1983-),男,广西东兰人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向:国土空间规划与生态安全。[WEI Zhenfeng(1983-), male, born in Donglan, Guangxi Province, Ph.D., associate professor, research on territorial spatial planning and ecological security] E-mail: weizhenfeng112@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-01-30