[1]王永艳,文安邦*,张信宝,等.三峡水库干支流悬移质泥沙及支流泥沙沉积特征——以忠县段为例[J].山地学报,2017,(02):151-159.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000207]
 WANG Yongyan,WEN Anbang,ZHANG Xinbao,et al.Sedimentary Characteristics of Suspending Particles in the Mainstream of the Three Gorges Reservoir and Its Tributaries—A Case Study in Zhong County[J].Mountain Research,2017,(02):151-159.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000207]
点击复制

三峡水库干支流悬移质泥沙及支流泥沙沉积特征——以忠县段为例()
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
151-159
栏目:
山地生态环境
出版日期:
2017-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Sedimentary Characteristics of Suspending Particles in the Mainstream of the Three Gorges Reservoir and Its Tributaries—A Case Study in Zhong County
文章编号:
1108-2786-(2017)2-151-09
作者:
王永艳12文安邦1*张信宝1史忠林1严冬春1
1.中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所 山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室,610041,成都;
2.中国科学院大学,100049,北京
Author(s):
WANG Yongyan12WEN Anbang1ZHANG Xinbao1SHI Zhonglin1YAN Dongchun1
1.Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation,Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chengdu,Sichuan 610041,China;
2.Chinese Academy of Sciences
关键词:
悬移质沉积泥沙颗粒组成三峡库区
Keywords:
suspending sediment deposited sediment riparian zone Three Gorges reservoir Region
分类号:
X131
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
长江上游水库群的开发和利用,导致上游入库泥沙的减少,坡面侵蚀产沙贡献增加,造成三峡水库入库泥沙沉积及其来源的变化;同时,大坝蓄水使干支流之间存在水流和物质能量的交换作用,缓慢的流速导致三峡水库支流富营养化现象较突出。所以,三峡水库入库泥沙的构成,库区干支流悬移质泥沙特征以及消落带泥沙沉积过程是迫切需要研究的问题。本文选择三峡库区中游忠县境内长江干流和一级支流汝溪河作为研究对象,采集雨季7—9月长江干流和支流汝溪河悬移质泥沙和汝溪河库湾消落带沉积泥沙剖面分层样品,并测试样品的颗粒组成和Cs-137活度。结果表明:7月份低水位时期,干流和支流悬移泥沙的中值粒径分别为12.81μm和18.87μm,且支流砂粒体积百分比较干流高,说明支流悬移泥沙比干流粗;137Cs比活度分别为0.87和0.65Bq/kg,均较低。而8月份和9月份,干流悬移泥沙颗粒粗细和7月份相当,而支流悬移泥沙的平均中值粒径仅为6.05μm,与干流悬移质泥沙相比偏细;137Cs比活度分别为1.23和2.16Bq/kg。可以发现无论是干流还是支流,137Cs比活度变化均表现为8月份比7月份偏高,且8月份支流137Cs比活度比干流偏高。这是因为7月份是暴雨导致的表下层侵蚀泥沙,泥沙颗粒较粗且137Cs比活度较低;而8月份的悬移泥沙主要归结于频繁的中小雨引起的坡面表层侵蚀产沙,泥沙颗粒较细且富含137Cs。对于支流典型泥沙沉积剖面的研究表明,从2008至今,汝溪河库湾消落带泥沙总淤积厚度在7cm左右,中值粒径介于4.613.7μm之间,137Cs比活度的范围为1.391.97Bq/kg。根据137Cs比活度结合河流输沙颗粒组成的旋回分层特征,可以大致区分出雨季和旱季的沉积泥沙,初步弄清支流消落带泥沙沉积过程。
Abstract:
Construction of cascade dams along the main stream and tributaries of the Upper Yangtze River is leading to a considerable reduction in the amount of suspending sediments,as discharged into the upper reaches of the Three Gorges Revoir. However,with the increase of sediment yield caused by sloping surface,the Three Gorges reservoir is constantly fed with reservoir sedimentation and alter its sediment origins. The impounding of Three Gorges Dam produces interaction of biological,physical and chemical matter between the main stream and tributaries and lasting sedimentation in riparian zone. Decreasing flow velocity caused by impoundment in tributaries has caused noticeable eutrophication. Therefore,there is an urgent need to investigate composition,characteristic of suspending sediment and deposition processes in riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir. The Ruxi River,a tributary of the Yangtze River located at Zhong County,as well as an adjacent section of the mainstream near its confluence,were chosen as the study area. Monthly suspending sediments in the mainstream and tributary were trapped for testing from July to September,2015. Stratified sediment samples in riparian zone of the Ruxi River were collected in July,2015 and the Grain-size composition and137Cs activity were analyzed. Results indicated that the median particle size of the suspending sediments collected in the mainstream and tributary were 12.81 μm and 18.87 μm,respectively. The sand percentage of tributary sediment samples was higher than those of the mainstream samples in July,implying that the particle size of tributary sediment was coarser than those of the main stream sediment. The grain-size composition of sediments in the mainstream during August and September was identical with those in July. As to suspending sediments in the tributary,it had a finer size than those in July. 137Cs activities of suspended sediment collected in July were 0.87 and 0.65Bq/kg in the mainstream and tributary,respectively. They were both lower than those of sediments collected in August,especially ones collected in the tributary with an average137Cs activity of 2.16Bq/kg. The coarser particles and lower137Cs activity of suspending sediment in the tributary in July could be ascribed to subsurface erosion from heavy rainstorm events,whereas finer sediment composition and higher137Cs activity in August could be attributed to surface erosion caused by frequent light rain. The stratified sediment instrument was installed in 2008 in the riparian zone of the Ruxi River,which trapped a sediment layer with a thickness of 7 cm till the sampling date. The median size and137cs activity of cored stratified sediment ranged between 4.6-13.7 μm and 1.39-1.97 Bq/kg,respectively. According to the distribution of137Cs activities combining with sediment grain-size composition,the sediment deposition processes in riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir during rainy and dry seasons were roughly distinguished.

参考文献/References:

[1] 杨兆平,常禹,布仁仓,等. 岷江上游干旱河谷区域空间变化的定量判定 [J]. 生态学报,2007,27(8): 3250-3256. [YANG Zhaoping,CHANG Yu,BU Rencang,et al. Long-term dynamics of dry valleys in the upper reaches of Min River,China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(8): 3250-3256.]
[2] 李昌爱. 近35年苏南典型地区的土地利用动态变化研究_以宜兴市为例 [D]. 安徽师范大学硕士论文,2003,5. [LI Changai. Land use change in the typical region of Jiangsu Province for last 35 years: a case study in Yixing City [D]. Anhui Normal University,2003,5.]
[3] 杨兆平,常禹,胡远满,等. 岷江上游干旱河谷景观变化及驱动力分析 [J]. 生态学杂志,2007,26(6): 869-874. [YANG Zhaoping,CHANG Yu,HU Yuanman,et al. Landscape change and its driving forces of dry valley in upper reaches of Min River [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2007,26(6): 869-874.]
[4] 樊宏,张建平. 岷江上游半干旱河谷土地利用-土地覆盖研究 [J]. 中国沙漠,2002,22(3): 273-278. [FAN Hong,ZHANG Jianping. Study on land use / cover in arid valley of upper Minjiang watershed [J]. Journal of Desert Research,2002,22(3): 273-278.]
[5] 包维楷,庞学勇,李芳兰,等. 干旱河谷生态恢复与持续管理的科学基础 [M]. 科学出版社,2012. [BAO Weikai,PANG Xueyong,LI Fanglan,et al. Arid valley ecological restoration and sustainable management of scientific basis [M]. Science Press,2012.]
[6] 蔡凡隆,张军,胡开波. 四川干旱河谷的分布与面积调查 [J]. 四川农业科技,2009,30(4): 82-85. [CAI Fanlong,ZHANG Jun,HU Kaibo. Distribution and area investigation of the arid valley in Sichuan Province [J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology,2009,30(4): 82-85.]
[7] 李云强,齐伟,王丹,等. GIS支持下山区县域农村居民点分布特征研究_以栖霞市为例 [J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2011,27(3): 73-77. [LI Yunqiang,QI Wei,WANG Dan,et al. Research on spatial distribution characteristics of rural settlements in mountainous areas at County level based on GIS: a case study in Qixia City [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science,2011,27(3): 73-77.]
[8] 杨瑞红,董春,张玉. 汶川县居民地要素空间分布特征分析 [J]. 测绘科学,2014,39(11): 72-75. [YANG Ruihong,DONG Chun,ZHANG Yu. Analysis on spatial distribution characteristics of residential features in Wenchuan County [J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping,2014,39(11): 72-75.]
[9] 张文辉,卢涛,马克明,等. 岷江上游干旱河谷植物群落分布的环境与空间因素分析 [J]. 生态学报,2004,24(3): 552-559. [ZHANG Wenhun,LU Tao,MA Keming,etal. Analysis on the environmental and spatial factors for plant community distribution in the arid valley in the upper reach of Minjiang River [J]. Acta Ecologiga snica,2004,24(3): 552-559.]
[10] 王渺林,郭丽娟,高攀宇,等. 岷江流域水资源安全及适应对策 [J]. 重庆交通学院学报,2006,25(4): 138-142. [WANG Miaolin,GUO Lijuan,GAO Panyu,etal. Discussion on water security problem and countermeasure in Minjiang River [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University,2006,25(4): 138-142.]
[11] 李斌,李丽娟,李海滨,等. 澜沧江流域干旱变化的时空特征 [J]. 农业工程学报,2011,27(5): 87-92. [LI Bin,LI Lijuan,LI Haibin,etal. Spatial and temporal variability of droughts in the Lancang River basin [J]. Transactions of the CSAE,2011,27(5): 87-92.]
[12] 庞学勇,包维楷,吴宁.岷江上游干旱河谷气候特征及成因 [J]. 长江流域资源环境,2008,17(S1): 46-53.[PANG Xueyong,BAO Weikai,WU Ning. Reasons of dry valley climate characteristic and its formation reason in upstream of Min River [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2008,17(S1): 46-53.]
[13] 杨兆平,常禹,杨孟,等. 岷江上游干旱河谷景观边界动态及其影响域 [J]. 应用生态学报,2007,18(9): 1972-1976. [YANG Zhaoping,CHANG Yu,YANG Meng,et al. Dynamics and influence width of dry valley landscape boundary in the upper reaches of Min River [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2007,18(9): 1972-1976.]
[14] 刘国华,马克明,傅伯杰,等.岷江干旱河谷主要灌丛类型地上生物量研究 [J]. 生态学报,2003,23(9): 1757-1764.[LIU Guohua,MA Keming,FU Bojie,etal. Above ground biomass of main shrubs in dry valley of Min River [J]. Acta Ecologica sinica,2003,23(9): 1757-1764.]
[15] 杨钦周. 岷江上游干旱河谷灌丛研究 [J]. 山地学报,2007,25(1): 1-32. [YANG Qinzhou. Study on the arid-valley Scrubs in the upper reaches of Min River [J]. Journal Mountain Science,2007,25(1): 1-32.]
[16] 丁明涛,庙成. 基于GIS的芦山地震灾区滑坡灾害风险评价 [J]. 自然灾害学报,2014,23(4): 81-90. [DING Mingtao,MIAO Cheng. GIS-based risk assessment on landslide hazards in Lushan earthquake-stricken areas [J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2014,23(4): 81-90.]
[17] DING Mingtao,CHENG Zunlan,WANG Qing. Coupling mechanism of rural settlements and mountain disasters in the upper reaches of Min River [J],Journal of Mountain Science,2014,11(1): 66-72.
[18] DING Mingtao,HU Kaiheng. Susceptibility mapping of landslides in Beichuan County using cluster and MLC methods [J],Natural Hazards,2014,70(1): 755-766.
[19] 伏耀龙. 岷江上游干旱河谷区土壤质量评价及侵蚀特征研究 [D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012,1-106. [FU Yaolong. Study on evaluation of soil quality and erosion characters in dry valley of the upper Min River. Northwest A&F University,2012,1-106.]
[20] 中文百科在线(Chinese Wikipedia Online)[DB/OL]. http://www.zwbk.org/PictureShow.aspx?pid=20121210163619252_7405.jpg&title=%u6CB3%u8C37%u6A2A%u5256%u9762%u7ED3%u6784%u56FE&lid=272809.
[21] 孙辉,唐亚,黄雪菊,等. 横断山区干旱河谷研究现状和发展方向 [J]. 世界科技研究与发展,2005,27: 54-61. [SUN Hui,TANG Yajun,HUANG Xueju,et al. Present situations and its R&D of dry valleys in the Hengduan Mountains of SW China [J].Word Sci-Tech R & D,2005,27: 54-61.]
[22] 申学圣,宫渊波,陈林武,等. 岷江上游干旱河谷4个乡土树种的抗旱生理指标主成分分析 [J]. 贵州林业科技,2012,40(4): 1-6. [SHEN Xue-sheng,GONG Yuan-bo,CHEN Lin-wu,et al. Principal component analysis on drought-resistance of 4 native tree species in arid valleys of the Minjiang River [J]. Guizhou Forestry Science and technology,2012,40(4):1-6.]
[23] 徐建. 现代地理学中的数学方法 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,2002,93-97. [XU Jian. Mathematical methods in contemporary Geography [M]. Beijing: Higher education press,2002,93-97.]
[24] 黄雄伟. 基于GIS和RS的城市土地利用时空演化研究-以长沙为例 [D]. 北京: 中国地质大学博士集,2008. [HUANG Xiongwei. Remote sensing and GIS-based analysis on temporal-spatial evolution of urban land use change: a case study of Changsha [D].Beijing: A Dissertation Submitted to China University of Geosciences for Doctoral Degree,2008.]
[25] 陈四清,刘保春.1988-2006年东莞市建设用地时空演变研究与分析 [J]. 湖北农业科学,2011,50(23): 4828-4830. [CHEN Siqing,LIU Baochun. Research and analysis on temporal and spatial change of construction land in Dongguan City from 1988 to 2006 [J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2011,50(23): 4828-4830.]
[26] 孙希义. 区域土地利用变化与驱动力研究:以北培区为例 [D]. 重庆: 西南农业大学,2005. [SUN Xiyi. Regional land use change and driving force: a case study on Beibei District [D]. Chongqing City: Southwest Agriculture University,2005.]
[27] 王琼. 鄯善县土地利用变化检测研究 [D]. 新疆大学,2009. [WANG Qiong. A Study of Xinjiiang Shanshan County's land use change detection [D]. Xinjiang University,2009.]
[28] 赵学钦,杨海军,马青,等. 塔北西部一间房组碳酸盐岩礁滩体同生期暴露溶蚀作用模式 [J]. 中国地质,2015,42(6): 1811-1821. [ZHAO Xueqin,Yang Haijun,Ma Qin,et al. Syn-sedimentary corrosion mode of carbonate reef-banks in the middle Ordovician Yijianfang formation within the western Tabei uplift of Tarim Basin[J]. Geology in China,2015,42(6): 1811-1821.]
[29] 李晓青,孙佳,唐焰,等. 洞庭湖区平垸行洪对土地利用结构的影响一以湖南沅江市为例 [J],农业现代化研究,2004,25(6): 422-424. [LI Xiaoqing,SUN Jia,TANG Yan,et al. Effects of sluicing flood via plain on regional land use of Dongting Lake region-taking Yuanjiang City of Hunan as example [J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization,2004,25(6): 422-424.]
[30] 朱小韦. 河南省电子政务基础地理空间数据库研究 [D]. 河南理工大学,2009,9(71). [ZHU Xiaowei. Research on the E-government basic geographic spatial database of Henan Province [D]. Henan Polytechnic University,2009,9(71).]
[31] 刘盛和,何书金. 土地利用动态变化的空间分析测算模型 [J]. 自然资源学报,2002,17(5): 532-540. [LIU Shenghe,HE Shujin. A spatial analysis model for measuring the rate of land use change [J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2002,17(5): 532-540.]
[32] 侯芳. 基于RS和GIS的吐鲁番市土地利用时空演化及预测研究 [D]. 新疆大学,2010. [HOU Fang. Remote sensing and GIS-based analysis on temporal-spatial evolution and forecast of land use change in Turpan city [D]. Xinjiang University,2010.]
[33] 李奕. 岷江上游植被复原与恢复评价 [D]. 北京林业大学,2009. [LI Yi. The Vegetation reconstruction and restoration in the upper reaches of Min River [D]. Beijing Forestry University,2009.]
[34] 赵宏. 城市土地利用动态变化及空间格局研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2009.[ZHAO Hong. Research on dynamic-change of land-use and spatial pattern of urban area [D] Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology,2009.]
[35] 岳德鹏,王计平,刘永兵,等. 京郊西北地区农地利用与景观格局时空特征 [J]. 农业工程学报,2008,24(6): 89-95. [YUE Depeng,WANG Jiping,LIU Yongbing,et al. Spatial and temporal characteristics of agricultural land-use and landscape pattern changes in northwest of Beijing [J].Transactions of the CSAE,2008,24(6): 89-95.]
[36] 陈会广. 经济发展中土地非农化的制度响应与政府征用绩效研究 [D]. 南京农业大学,2004. [CHEN Huiguang. On the institutional response to land conversion and the performance of government expropriating during economic development [D]. Nanjing Agricultural University,2004.]
[37] 卢明龙. 海河流域土地利用变化特征及趋势分析 [D]. 天津大学,2010. [LU Minglong. Feature of land use change and analysis of its changing trend in Haihe River Basin [D]. Tianjin University,2010.]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学重点基金(41430750; 41671286; 41301293)[National Natural Sciences Foundation of China(41430750; 41671286; 41301293)]
作者简介(Biography):王永艳(1989-)女,博士研究生,主要研究方向:土壤侵蚀与水土保持。[Wang Yongyan,(1989-),female,Ph.D. candidate,mainly engaged in soil erosion and soil and water conservation]E-mail:wyyhu2008@126.com
*通信作者(Corresponding author):文安邦(1964-),男,研究员,主要研究方向:土壤侵蚀与水土保持。[Wen Anbang,(1964-), male,professor,mainly engaged in soil erosion and soil and water conservation]E-mail:wabang@imde.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-30