[1]汪 震,姜勇彪*.江西宜黄盆地丹霞地貌特征分析[J].山地学报,2019,(6):839-847.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000474]
　WANG Zhen,JIANG Yongbiao*.Analysis of Danxia Landform Characteristics in the Yihuang Basin, Jiangxi Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2019,(6):839-847.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000474]
点击复制

江西宜黄盆地丹霞地貌特征分析()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2019年第6期
页码:
839-847
栏目:
山地环境
出版日期:
2019-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Danxia Landform Characteristics in the Yihuang Basin, Jiangxi Province, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2019)6-839-09
作者:
汪 震1; 姜勇彪1; 2*
1.东华理工大学 地球科学学院,南昌330013; 2.江西省数字国土重点实验室,南昌330013
Author(s):
WANG Zhen1;  JIANG Yongbiao1; 2*
1. School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China; 2. Key Laboratory for Digital Land and Resources of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, China
关键词:
丹霞地貌;  面积高程积分;  演化阶段;  哨兵2A;  宜黄盆地
Keywords:
Danxia landform;  hypsometry;  evolution stage;  Sentinel-2A;  the Yihuang Basin
分类号:
P931~A
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000474
摘要:
系统性定量化的丹霞地貌特征研究目前较少,利用新遥感数据和定量方法分析丹霞地貌特征,能进一步查明丹霞地貌特征,探索新数据和方法的应用价值。本文通过实地调查、利用数字高程模型和哨兵2A遥感影像,结合定量化方法系统分析江西宜黄盆地的丹霞地貌特征。结果表明,通过哨兵2A彩色波段组合,识别出8处丹霞地貌分布区,与实地调查结果吻合,哨兵2A用于小范围红层盆地内丹霞地貌特征不明显区域识别精度较好。通过面积高程积分法定量化分析红层和丹霞地貌的演化阶段,发现整体红层分布区的积分值为0.22,积分曲线呈下凹形,主要为老年早期; 丹霞地貌区的积分值在0.40～0.51之间,积分曲线呈上凹下凸的“S”形,主要为壮年晚期,与实际地貌演化阶段相符,说明面积高程积分法对丹霞地貌的演化阶段有较好的指示作用。本文研究将为哨兵2A在地质方面的应用提供参考,为面积高程积分法在丹霞地貌演化阶段方面的应用提供借鉴。
Abstract:
Currently, there are few systematic and quantitative types of research on the characteristics of Danxia landform. Based on new remote sensing data and quantitative methods, the characteristics of Danxia landform can be analyzed, further identifying the characteristics of Danxia landform and exploring the application value of new data and methods. In this paper, in terms of field investigation, Digital Elevation Model, and Sentinel-2A remote sensing image, combined with quantitative method, Danxia landform characteristics of the Yihuang Basin in Jiangxi province were systematically analyzed. The results showed that eight Danxia sites were identified via the Sentinel-2A band combination consistent with the results of field investigation. Sentinel-2A had a good recognition accuracy in a small area of red bed basin where the features of remote sensing images of Danxia landform were not obvious. Quantitative analysis along with the hypsometry method was carried out to analyze the evolution stages of the red beds and Danxia sites in the Yihuang Basin. The hypsometric index of the red beds area in the Yihuang Basin was 0.22, and the hypsometric curve was concave, indicating the geomorphic evolution stage was early stage of old age. The hypsometric index of the Danxia sites in the Yihuang Basin was 0.40～0.51, and the hypsometric curve was an S-shape with a concave upper part and a convex lower part, indicating the geomorphic evolution stage was from the early stage to the late stage of the mature age, which mainly belonged to the late stage of the mature age. Consequently, it was consistent with the actual stage of geomorphic evolution showing that the hypsometry method has a better indicating effect on the evolution stage of the Danxia landform. This study offered a reference for the application of Sentinel-2A in geology and the application of the hypsometry method in the evolution stage of the Danxia landform.

参考文献/References:

[1] 彭华,潘志新,闫罗彬,等.国内外红层与丹霞地貌研究述评[J].地理学报,2013,68(9):1170-1181. [PENG Hua, PAN Zhixin, YAN Luobin, et al. A review of the research on red beds and Danxia landform [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(9):1170-1181]
[2] 黄进,陈致均,齐德利.中国丹霞地貌分布(上)[J].山地学报,2015,33(4):385-396. [HUANG Jin, CHEN Zhijun, QI Deli. Study on distribution of Danxia landform in China(first)[J]. Mountain Research,2015,33(4):385-396]
[3] 黄进,陈致均,齐德利.中国丹霞地貌分布(下)[J].山地学报,2015,33(6):649-673. [HUANG Jin, CHEN Zhijun, QI Deli. Study on distribution of Danxia landform in China(last)[J]. Mountain Research,2015,33(6):649-673]
[4] YAN Luobin, PENG Hua, ZHANG Shaoyun, et al. The spatial patterns of red beds and Danxia landforms: implication for the formation factors-China[J]. Scientific Reports,2019,9(1): 1961-1971.
[5] PENG Hua, REN Fang, PAN Zhixin. A review of Danxia landforms in China[J]. Zeitschrift Für Geomorphologie,2015,59(Suppl.1): 19-33.
[6] 黄进.丹霞地貌坡面发育的一种基本方式[J].热带地理,1982,3(2):107-134. [HUANG Jin. A basic model of the slope development of Danxia landform[J]. Tropical Geography, 1982, 3(2):107-134]
[7] 郭福生,姜勇彪,胡中华,等.龙虎山世界地质公园丹霞地貌成景系统特征及其演化[J].山地学报,2011,29(2):195-201. [GUO Fusheng, JIANG Yongbiao, HU Zhonghua, et al. Evolution and genesis system features of Danxia landform in Longhushan World Geopark[J]. Mountain Research, 2011,29(2):195-201]
[8] 姜勇彪. 江西信江盆地丹霞地貌研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2010.[JIANG Yongbiao. A study on the Danxia landfroms in Xinjiang Basin, Jiangxi Province[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology,2010]
[9] 彭华,邱卓炜,潘志新.丹霞山顺层洞穴风化特征的试验研究[J].地理科学,2014,34(4):454-463.[PENG Hua, QIU Zhuowei, PAN Zhixin. Experimental study on the weathering features of bedding cavesat Mt. Danxiashan[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2014,34(4):454-463]
[10] ZHU Cheng, WU Li, ZHU Tongxin, et al. Experimental studies on the Danxia landscape morphogenesis in Mt.Danxiashan, South China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2015,25(8):943-966.
[11] 李馨敏,郭福生,陈留勤,等.龙虎山世界地质公园象鼻山栈道洞穴地貌成因[J].山地学报,2018,36(4):509-518. [LI Xinmin, GUO Fusheng, CHEN Liuqin, et al. Origin analysis of the cavities along the Xiangbishan cliffs in the Longhushan Global Geopark, Southeast China [J]. Mountain Research,2018,36(4): 509-518]
[12] 潘志新,任舫,彭华.美国西部红层地貌发育及与中国东南部丹霞地貌的对比[J].地理研究,2018,37(12):2399-2410. [PAN Zhixin, REN Fang, PENG Hua. Development of red bed landform in the western United States and a comparison with Danxia landform in southeast China[J]. Geographical Research, 2018,37(12):2399-2410]
[13] 欧阳杰,朱诚,彭华.丹霞地貌的国内外研究对比[J].地理科学,2011,31(8):996-1000. [OUYANG Jie, ZHU Cheng, PENG Hua. A contrast introduction to Danxia landforms from a world-wide references for similar landforms[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2011,31(8):996-1000]
[14] 姜勇彪,郭福生,胡中华,等.信江盆地丹霞地貌特征及其景观类型[J].山地学报,2010,28(4):505-512. [JIANG Yongbiao, GUO Fusheng, HU Zhonghua, et al. A study on the features of Danxia landform and Its landscape types in Xinjiang Basin[J]. Mountain Research, 2010,28(4):505-512]
[15] 黄宝华,郭福生,姜勇彪,等.广丰盆地丹霞地貌遥感影像特征[J].山地学报,2010,28(4):500-504. [HUANG Baohua, GUO Fusheng, JIANG Yongbiao, et al. Characteristics of remote sensing images of Danxia landform in Guangfeng Basin[J]. Mountain Research, 2010,28(4):500-504]
[16] 杨斌,李丹,高桂胜,等.Sentinel-2A卫星数据处理分析及在干旱河谷提取中的应用[J].国土资源遥感,2018,30(3):128-135.[YANG Bin,Li Dan,QAO Guisheng,et al. Processing analysis of Sentinel-2A data and application to arid valleys extraction[J].Remote Sensing for Land and Resources,2018,30(3):128-135]
[17] 田颖,陈卓奇,惠凤鸣,等.欧空局哨兵卫星Sentinel-2A/B数据特征及应用前景分析[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(1):57-65. [TIAN Ying, CHEN Zhuoqi, HUI Fengming, et al. ESA Sentinel-2A/B satellite: characteristics and applications[J].Journal of Beijing National University(Natural Science), 2019,55(1):57-65]
[18] 苏伟,侯宁,李琪,等.基于Sentinel-2遥感影像的玉米冠层叶面积指数反演[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(1):151-156. [SU Wei, HOU Ning, LI Qi, et al. Retrieving leaf area index of corn canopy based on Sentinel-2 remote sensing image[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018,49(1):151-156]
[19] 朱琳. 基于Sentinel多源遥感数据的作物分类及种植面积提取研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.[ZHU Lin. Study on crop classification and area extraction based on multi-source remote sensing data of Sentinel [D].Yangling: Northwest A&F University,2018]
[20] 毕恺艺,牛铮,黄妮,等.基于Sentinel-2A时序数据和面向对象决策树方法的植被识别[J].地理与地理信息科学,2017,33(5):16-20.[BI Kaiyi, NIU Zheng, HUANG Ni, et al. Identifying vegetation with decision tree model based on object-oriented method using multi-temporal Sentinel-2A images[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2017,33(5):16-20]
[21] 李旭文,侍昊,张悦,等.基于欧洲航天局“哨兵-2A”卫星的太湖蓝藻遥感监测[J].中国环境监测,2018,34(4):169-176. [LI Xuwen, SHI Hao, ZHANG Yue, et al. Cyanobacteria blooms monitoring in Taihu Lake based on the Sentinel-2A Satellite of European Space Agency[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2018,34(4):169-176]
[22] 高明星,陈桂华,徐锡伟. 地貌参数指示的临潭-宕昌断裂带最新构造隆升差异与地震活动[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(3):709-718. [GAO Mingxing,CHEN Guihua,XU Xiwei. Geomorphic indices indicated recent differential tectonic uplift of the Lintan-Dangchang Fault and the Minxian-Zhangxian earthquake[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2015, 37(3): 709-718]
[23] 谢超,周本刚,李正芳. 东喜马拉雅构造结地貌形态及其构造指示意义[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(2):276-286. [XIE Chao, ZHOU Bengang, LI Zhengfang. Geomorphic features of Eastern Himalayan syntaxis and its tectonic implications[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2017, 39(2):276-286]
[24] 祝士杰,汤国安,李发源,等.基于DEM的黄土高原面积高程积分研究[J].地理学报,2013,68(7):921-932. [ZHU Shijie, TANG Guo'an, LI Fayuan, et al. Spatial variation of hypsometric integral in the Loess Plateau based on DEM[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(7):921-932]
[25] 李玉辉,丁智强,吴晓月.基于Strahler面积-高程分析的云南石林县域喀斯特地貌演化的量化研究[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):973-985. [LI Yuhui, DING Zhiqiang, WU Xiaoyue. A quantitative study on the karst geomorphic evolution of Shilin county in Yunnan province of China based on Strahler hypsometric analysis[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(5):973-985]
[26] 章桂芳,陈凯伦,张浩然,等.基于DEM的丹霞地貌演化阶段划分[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2018,57(2):12-21. [ZHANG Guifang, Chen Kailin, Zhang Haoran, et al. The evolution stage decision of Danxia landform based on digital elevation model(DEM). ACTA Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2018, 57(2):12-21]
[27] DRUSCH M, DEL BELLO U, CARLIER S, et al. Sentinel-2: ESA's optical High-Resolution mission for GMES operational services[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2012,120(SI): 25-36.
[28] STRAHLER A N. Hypsometric(area-altitude)analysis of erosional topography[J].Bulletin of the Geological Society of America,1952,63(11):1117-1142.
[29] 常直杨,王建,白世彪,等.面积高程积分值计算方法的比较[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(3):171-175. [CHANG Zhiyang, WANG Jian, BAI Shibiao, et al. Comparison of hypsometric integral methods[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015,29(3):171-175]
[30] PIKE R J, WILSON S.Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral, and geomorphic area-altitude analysis[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1971,(82):1079-1084.
[31] VICENTE PEREZ-PENA J, AZOR A, MIGUEL AZANON J A. Active tectonics in the Sierra Nevada(Betic Cordillera, SE Spain): Insights from geomorphic indexes and drainage pattern analysis[J]. Geomorphology, 2010, 119(1/2): 74-87.

相似文献/References:

[1]姜勇彪,郭福生,陈珊珊,等.江西信江盆地丹霞地貌空间分布及其成因[J].山地学报,2013,(06):731.
　JIANG Yongbiao,GUO Fusheng,CHEN Shanshan.Spatial Distribution and Its Genesis of the Danxia Landforms in Xinjiang Basin, Jiangxi[J].Mountain Research,2013,(6):731.
[2]郭福生,姜伏伟,胡中华,等.丹霞地貌危岩景观分类及可持续开发对策——以龙虎山景区为例[J].山地学报,2012,(01):99.
　GUO Fusheng,JIANG Fuwei,HU Zhonghua,et al.Danxia Landscape Rockfalllandscape Types and Protection Measures—— A Case Study of Mt. Longhushan in Jiangxi, China[J].Mountain Research,2012,(6):99.
[3]郭福生,姜勇彪,胡中华,等.龙虎山世界地质公园丹霞地貌成景系统特征及其演化[J].山地学报,2011,(02):195.
　GUO Fusheng,JIANG Yongbiao,HU Zhonghua,et al.Evolution and Genesis System Features of Danxia Lanform in Longhushan World Geopark[J].Mountain Research,2011,(6):195.
[4]周学军.中国丹霞地貌的南北差异及其旅游价值[J].山地学报,2003,(02):180.
[5]姜勇彪,郭福生,孙传敏,等.江西弋阳县龟峰丹霞地貌景观特征与形成机制[J].山地学报,2008,(01):120.
[6]姜勇彪,郭福生,胡中华,等.龙虎山世界地质公园丹霞地貌特征及与国内其他丹霞地貌的对比[J].山地学报,2009,(03):353.
[7]张广胜,朱诚,俞锦标,等.浙江江郎山丹霞地貌区岩性特征[J].山地学报,2010,(03):301.
[8]黄宝华,郭福生,姜勇彪,等.广丰盆地丹霞地貌遥感影像特征[J].山地学报,2010,(04):500.
[9]姜勇彪,郭福生,胡中华,等.信江盆地丹霞地貌特征及其景观类型[J].山地学报,2010,(04):505.
[10]嘉益.封面照片:丹霞山[J].山地学报,2015,(03):293.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2019-03-11; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2019-12-26
基金项目(Foundation item):江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ160534)。[Science and Technology Development Project of Department of Education of Jiangxi Province of China(GJJ160534)]
作者简介(Biography):汪震(1995-),男,河南新蔡人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:景观地貌学。[WANG Zhen(1995-),male, born in Xincai county, Henan province, M.Sc. candidate, research on landscape geomorphology] E-mail: 1287751908@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-30