[1]余 杭,罗清虎,李松阳,等.灾害干扰受损森林土壤的碳、氮、磷初期恢复特征与变异性[J].山地学报,2020,(4):532-541.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000531]
 YU Hang,LUO Qinghu,LI Songyang,et al.Initial Recovery Characteristics and Variability of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus in the Damaged Forests under Disaster Disturbance[J].Mountain Research,2020,(4):532-541.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000531]
点击复制

灾害干扰受损森林土壤的碳、氮、磷初期恢复特征与变异性()
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2020年第4期
页码:
532-541
栏目:
山地环境
出版日期:
2020-09-27

文章信息/Info

Title:
Initial Recovery Characteristics and Variability of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus in the Damaged Forests under Disaster Disturbance
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2020)4-532-10
作者:
余 杭123罗清虎123李松阳123林勇明12*王道杰4
1.福建农林大学 林学院,福州 350002; 2.中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,成都 610041; 3.福建省高校森林生态系统过程与经营重点实验室,福州 350002; 4.中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都 610041
Author(s):
YU Hang123 LUO Qinghu123 LI Songyang123 LIN Yongming 12* WANG Daojie4
1. College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Surface Processes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; 3. Key Laboratory for Forest Ecosystem Process and Management of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350002, China; 4. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Conservancy, Chengdu 610041, China
关键词:
土壤养分 生态恢复 变异系数 福建 南平
Keywords:
soil nutrient ecological restoration variable coefficient Fujian Nanping
分类号:
S714.2
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000531
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2010年6月福建省南平市特大洪水诱发大面积滑坡,造成区域内森林严重受损。本文选取特大洪灾中受损的次生阔叶林和杉木林为研究对象,测定不同样地(受损区、未受损区、受损恢复区)表层土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)和全磷(TP)含量,分析受损森林恢复初期SOC、TN、TP的恢复率以及变异性特征。研究结果表明:(1)灾害造成次生阔叶林与杉木林严重受损,各样地SOC、TN、TP含量整体上随着植被盖度的降低而下降,呈现“未受损区>受损恢复区>受损区”的变化趋势,受损森林经过7年自然恢复尚未恢复至受灾前水平;(2)次生阔叶林仅TP含量表现为受损恢复区显著高于受损区,而杉木林受损恢复区SOC、TP含量均显著高于受损区,且其养分恢复率高于次生阔叶林,说明杉木林前期施肥工作对土壤养分的自然恢复具有积极的促进作用;(3)受损森林C:P主要受到SOC的影响,C:N、N:P值主要受到TN的影响。仅C:P在杉木林表现为受损恢复区显著高于受损区;(4)受损森林土壤养分变异性表现为TN>SOC>TP,恢复率则相反,说明灾害对受损森林TN的影响最大。上述研究表明灾害严重破坏土壤养分,土壤养分自然恢复进程较慢且效果较差,后期应对受损森林尤其是次生阔叶林进行适当的人工干预以促进其恢复。该研究结果可为该区受损森林的演替过程与机制预测、土壤侵蚀控制和恢复措施优化等提供科学依据。
Abstract:
In June 2010, heavy floods induced large-scale landslides in Nanping City, Fujian Province, China causing severe damages to forests in the area. In this study, two different kinds of forest lands(Cunninghamia lanceolata forest and secondary broad-leaved forest)destroyed by major floods were selected for determination of soil organic carbon(SOC)content, total nitrogen(TN)content and total phosphorus(TP)content of surface soil in different sample plots(damaged area, recovered area, and undamaged area), and then the initial recovery characteristics and variability of SOC, TN, TP of damaged forests were analyzed. The results show that:(1)Disaster caused severe damages to the secondary broad-leaved forest and Cunninghamia lanceolata forest. The contents of SOC, TN and TP in all plots decreased as the vegetation coverage, following the rule of “undamaged area>recovered area>damaged area”, indicating that damaged forests had not recovered to the pre-disaster level after seven years of natural recovery.(2)Only TP content of the recovered area was significantly higher than the damaged area in secondary broad-leaved forest, while the content of SOC and TP of the recovered area were both significantly higher than the damaged area in Cunninghamia lanceolata forest, and the recovery rate of soil nutrients in Cunninghamia lanceolata forest was higher than secondary broad-leaved forest, indicating that the early fertilization had a positive promoting effect on the natural restoration of soil nutrients in Cunninghamia lanceolata forest.(3)C:P value was mainly affected by SOC, C:N and N:P values were mainly affected by TN in the damaged forests, and only C:P value of recovered area was significantly higher than the damaged area in Cunninghamia lanceolata forest.(4)TN had the maximum variability, followed by SOC and TP in the damaged forests, but the recovery rate of soil nutrients was contrary to the above conclusions, indicating that disaster had the greatest impact on TN of the damaged forests. The results indicated that soil nutrients had been severely damaged by disaster, and the natural recovery process of soil nutrients was slow and the recovery effect was poor. Therefore, appropriate artificial measures should be carried out to promote the recovery of damaged forests, especially secondary broad-leaved forests. The research results can provide a scientific basis for the prediction of the succession process and mechanism, soil erosion control, and the optimization of restoration measures of the damaged forests.

参考文献/References:

[1] VAN OOST K, QUINE T A, GOVERS G, et al. The impact of agricultural soil erosion on the global carbon cycle[J]. Science, 2007, 318(5850): 626-629.
[2] ZHANG Jindong, HULL V, XU Weihua, et al. Impact of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake on biodiversity and giant panda habitat in Wolong Nature Reserve, China[J]. Ecological Research, 2011, 26(3): 523-531.
[3] 李宁宁,张光辉,王浩,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区浅层滑坡堆积体植被演替特征及土壤养分响应[J].山地学报,2018,36(5):669-678.[LI Ningning, ZHANG Guanghui, WANG Hao, et al. Properties of vegetation succession on shallow landslide deposits in loess hilly and gully region and the related response of soil nutrient[J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(5): 669-678]
[4] 陈晓清,崔鹏,韦方强.良好植被区泥石流防治初探[J].山地学报,2006,24(3):333-339.[CHEN Xiaoqing, CUI Peng, WEI Fangqiang. Study of control debris flow in high-covered vegetation region[J]. Mountain Research, 2006, 24(3): 333-339]
[5] GBUREK W J, SHARPLEY A N. Hydrologic controls on phosphorus loss from upland agricultural watersheds[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1998, 27(2): 267-277.
[6] 曾冬萍,蒋利玲,曾从盛,等.生态化学计量学特征及其应用研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5484-5492.[ZENG Dongping, JIANG Liling, ZENG Congsheng, et al. Reviews on the ecological stoichiometry characteristics and its applications[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(18): 5484-5492]
[7] 喻理飞,朱守谦,叶镜中,等.人为干扰与喀斯特森林群落退化及评价研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(5):529-532.[YU Lifei, ZHU Shouqian, YE Jingzhong, et al. Evaluation on degradation of Karst forest community and human disturbance[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(5): 529-532]
[8] WANG S J, LIU Q M, ZHANG D F. Karst rocky desertification in southwestern China: geomorphology, landuse, impact and rehabilitation[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2004, 15(2): 115-121.
[9] 吴聪,王金牛,卢涛,等.汶川地震对龙门山地区山地土壤理化性质的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(6):911-916.[WU Cong, WANG Jinniu, LU Tao, et al. Effect of Wenchuan earthquake on soil physical and chemical properties of the Longmen mountain, southwestern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2012, 18(6): 911-916]
[10] ARUNACHALAM A, ARUNACHALAM K, BHATTACHARJEE A, et al. Natural revegetation on landslides in humid tropical Arunachal Pradesh: community dynamics and soil properties[J]. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2000, 12(4): 682-696.
[11] YI Zhang, PENG Li, LIU Xiaojun, et al. Effects of farmland conversion on the stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soil aggregates on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 351:188-196.
[12] 杨秀云,郭平毅,韩有志,等.采伐干扰对林下草本根系生物量与土壤环境异质性关系的影响[J].植物科学学报,2012,30(6):545-551.[YANG Xiuyun, GUO Pingyi, HAN Youzhi, et al. Effects of cutting disturbance on spatial heterogeneity between root biomass of the herb and soil environment in larix principis-rupprechtii forests in Guandi Mountain[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2012, 30(6): 545-551]
[13] LEUSCHNER C, WULF M, BÄUCHLER P, et al. Soil C and nutrient stores under Scots pine afforestations compared to ancient beech forests in the German Pleistocene: the role of tree species and forest history[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 310(1): 405-415.
[14] 金增芳.玉树地震滑坡的特征与形成机理及治理措施[J].建筑结构,2013,43(S2):686-689.[JIN Zengfang. Yushu seismic landslide characteristics and formation mechanism and its control measures[J]. Building Structure, 2013, 43(S2): 686-689]
[15] 张德罡.砍伐与滑坡对东祁连山杜鹃灌丛草地土壤肥力的影响[J].草业学报,2002,11(3):72-75.[ZHANG Degang. Effect of deforestation and landslide on soil of Rhododendron shrub ecosystem in the eastern Qilian mountains[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2002, 11(3): 72-75]
[16] 林捷.福建省水土流失治理实践与探索[J].中国水土保持,2015,(10):27-28.[LIN Jie. Practice and exploration of soil and water loss control in Fujian province[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2015,(10): 27-28]
[17] 王振平,汪小钦,曾舒娇,等.福建省水土流失现状分析[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(5):169-175.[WANG Zhenping, WANG Xiaoqin, ZENG Shujiao, et al. Analysis of soil and water loss in Fujian province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 37(5): 169-175]
[18] 姚雄,余坤勇,刘健,等.南方水土流失严重区的生态脆弱性时空演变[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(3):735-745.[YAO Xiong, YU Kunyong, LIU Jian, et al. Spatial and temporal changes of the ecological vulnerability in a serious soil erosion area, Southern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(3): 735-745]
[19] 余坤勇,刘健,杨平,等.森林经营过程对区域发生滑坡的影响关系研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016,36(4):5-10.[YU Kunyong, LIU Jian, YANG Ping, et al. The impact of forest management forest management process on the landslide[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2016, 36(4): 5-10]
[20] 葛晓改,肖文发,曾立雄,等.不同林龄马尾松凋落物基质质量与土壤养分的关系[J].生态学报,2012,32(3):852-862.[GE Xiaogai, XIAO Wenfa, ZENG Lixiong, et al. Relationships between litter substrate quality and soil nutrients in different-aged Pinus massoniana stands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(3): 852-862]
[21] 刘颖,贺静雯,吴建召,等.震区典型受损区生态恢复过程中的土壤恢复率与空间异质性[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(4):823-830.[LIU Ying, HE Jingwen, WU Jianzhao, et al. Soil recovery rate and spatial heterogeneity in the process of ecological restoration in an earthquake-affected area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(4): 823-830]
[22] 吴鹏,崔迎春,赵文君,等.喀斯特森林植被自然恢复过程中土壤化学计量特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2019,41(3):80-92.[WU Peng, CUI Yingchun, ZHAO Wenjun, et al. Characteristics of soil stoichiometric in natural restoration process of Maolan karst forest vegetation, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(3): 80-92]
[23] 程晓莉,安树青,李远,等.鄂尔多斯草地退化过程中个体分布格局与土壤元素异质性[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(4):503-509.[CHENG Xiaoli, AN Shuqing, LI Yuan, et al. The individual distribution patterns and soil elements hetero-geneity during the degradation of grassland in Ordos.[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2003, 27(4): 503-509]
[24] CHANDER K, GOYAL S, NANDAL D P, et al. Soil organic matter, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a tropical agroforestry system[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1998, 27(2): 168-172.
[25] MORRISON I K, FOSTER N W. Fifteen-year change in forest floor organic and element content and cycling at the Turkey Lakes watershed[J]. Ecosystems, 2001, 4(6): 545-554.
[26] 赵越,罗志军,廖牧鑫,等.泰和县耕地土壤养分空间分布及影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(5):296-303.[ZHAO Yue, LUO Zhijun, LIAO Muxin, et al. Study on the spatial distribution of soil nutrients and its influencing factors in the cultivated land of Taihe county[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(5): 296-303]
[27] 余博.绢蒿属荒漠草地不同退化阶段土壤养分空间异质性的研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2009: 2-6.[YU Bo.Study on spatial variability of soil nutrient in Seriphidium desert grassland in different degraded stages[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2009: 2-6]
[28] 刘艳,宋同清,蔡德所,等.喀斯特峰丛洼地不同土地利用方式土壤肥力特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1561-1568.[LIU Yan, SONG Tongqing, CAI Desuo, et al. Soil fertility characteristics under different land use patterns in depressions between karst hills[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(6): 1561-1568]
[29] 杨红飞,穆少杰,李建龙.气候变化对草地生态系统土壤有机碳储量的影响[J].草业科学,2012,29(3):392-399.[YANG Hongfei, MU Shaojie, LI Jianlong. Effects of climate change on soil organic carbon storage of grassland ecosystem[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2012, 29(3): 392-399]
[30] FANG C, MONCRIEFF J B. The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001, 33(2): 155-165.
[31] JASON G V, VALENTINE D W, ROGER W R. Soil and root respiration in mature Alaskan black spruce forests that vary in soil organic matter decomposition rates[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 35(1): 161-174.
[32] 刘芳.2年生杉木人工林施肥效应及土壤养分含量变化的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2014: 1-6.[LIU Fang.Study on fertilization effects and the changes of soil nutrient content of 2-year-old Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2014: 1-6]
[33] 孙瑞莲,朱鲁生,赵秉强,等.长期施肥对土壤微生物的影响及其在养分调控中的作用[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1907-1910.[SUN Ruilian, ZHU Lusheng, ZHAO Bingqiang, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil microorganism and its role in adjusting and controlling soil fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(10): 1907-1910]
[34] 罗清虎,吴建召,崔羽,等.洪涝灾害干扰下受损自然恢复林地土壤基本性状及分形维数特征[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(1):29-37.[LUO Qinghu, WU Jianzhao, CUI Yu, et al.Characteristics of soil properties and fractal dimensions of destroyed and naturally restored forest land under floor disaster disturbance[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(1): 29-37]
[35] 李阳,裴志永,秦伟,等.区域性皆伐抚育作业对沙柳林地土壤养分空间异质性的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2016,16(18):161-165.[LI Yang, PEI Zhiyong, QIN Wei, et al. Regional clear cutting operation on soil nutrient of salix psammophila forest short-term disturbance characteristics[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(18): 161-165]
[36] 赵满兴,周建斌,延志莲.不同土层土壤对可溶性有机氮、碳的吸附特性研究[J].土壤通报,2010,41(6):1328-1332.[ZHAO Manxing, ZHOU Jianbin, YAN Zhilian. Adsorption characteristics of soluble organic carbon and nitrogen in different layer of cultivated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010, 41(6): 1328-1332]
[37] 王百群,戴鸣钧.土壤不同形态氮素在剖面中移动特征的模拟研究[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(4):117-122.[WANG Baiqun, DAI Mingjun. Simulated study on movement features of soil nitrogen in different forms in soil profile[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 7(4): 117-122]
[38] 王绍强,于贵瑞.生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):3937-3947.[WANG Shaoqiang, YU Guirui. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus elements[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947]
[39] GARNER W, STEINBERGER Y. A proposed mechanism for the formation of ‘Fertile Islands' in the desert ecosystem[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1989, 16(3): 257-262.
[40] PAUL B H, INGRID C B, LAUENROTH W K. Heterogeneity of soil and plant N and C associated with individual plants and openings in North American shortgrass steppe[J]. Plant and Soil, 1991, 138(2): 247-256.
[41] EPSTEIN H E, BURKE I C, Mosier A R. Plant effects on spatial and temporal patterns of nitrogen cycling in shortgrass steppe[J]. Ecosystems, 1998, 1(4): 374-385.
[42] 王军,傅伯杰,邱扬,等.黄土高原小流域土壤养分的空间异质性[J].生态学报,2002,22(8):1173-1178.[WANG Jun, FU Baijie, QIU Yang, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in a small catchment of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(8): 1173-1178]
[43] TIAN Hanqin, CHEN Guangsheng, ZHANG Chi, et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China's soils: a synthesis of observational data[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2010, 98(1/3): 139-151.
[44] CHEN Fusheng, XUE Feng, CHAO Liang. Endogenous versus exogenous nutrient affects C, N, and P dynamics in decomposing litters in mid-subtropical forests of China[J]. Ecological Research, 2012, 27(5): 923-932.
[45] BATJES N H. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2014, 65(1): 10-21.
[46] 赖壮杰,刘健,余坤勇,等.南方典型毛竹经营区土壤养分空间变异特征——以福建省南平市顺昌县毛竹林经营区为例[J].东北林业大学学报,2018,46(3):63-68.[LAI Zhuangjie, LIU Jian, YU Kunyong, et al. Spatial variability of soil nutrients in typical phyllostachys pubescens growing areas in South China—Takmg phyllostachys heterocycla cv.pubescens forest management area in Shunchang county, Nanping city, Fujian province as example[J]. Journal of North-East Forestry University, 2018, 46(3): 63-68]
[47] 朱秋莲,邢肖毅,张宏,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(15):4674-4682.[ZHU Qiulian, XING Xiaoyi, ZHANG Hong, et al. Soil ecological stoichiometry under different vegetation area on loess hilly gully region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(15): 4674-4682]

相似文献/References:

[1]牛赟,刘贤德,敬文茂,等.祁连山北坡土壤特性与植被垂直分布的关系[J].山地学报,2013,(05):527.
 NIU Yun,LIU Xiande,JING Wenmao,et al.Relationship between Characteristics of Soil and Vertical Distribution of Vegetation on the Northern Slope of Qilian Mountains[J].Mountain Research,2013,(4):527.
[2]张萍,刘宏茂,陈爱国,等.西双版纳热带山地利用过程中的土壤退化[J].山地学报,2001,(01):9.
[3]孙艳玲,郭鹏,刘洪斌,等.基于GIS重庆市土壤养分贫瘠化研究[J].山地学报,2002,(S1):125.
[4]宫怡文,刘键,李祥妹.西藏自治区小康示范村土壤养分状况及效益分析[J].山地学报,2003,(S1):113.
[5]庞学勇,包维楷.岷江柏林下土壤养分特征及种群间差异分析[J].山地学报,2005,(05):596.
[6]彭岳林,钱成,蔡晓布,等.西藏不同退化高寒草地土壤酶的活性[J].山地学报,2007,(03):344.
[7]郜文军,王印传,陈飞,等.小流域自然土壤与耕作土壤养分比较及影响因素分析[J].山地学报,2008,(05):632.
[8]庞家平,陈明勇,唐建维,等.橡胶-大叶千斤拔复合生态系统中的植物生长与土壤水分养分动态[J].山地学报,2009,(04):433.
[9]潘丽冰,徐凡珍,沙丽清.生物炭对土壤理化性质及橡胶幼苗生物量的影响[J].山地学报,2015,(04):449.
 PAN Libing,XU Fanzhen,SHA Liqing.Effect of Biochar on Soil Properties and Rubber(Hevea brasilensis) Seedling Biomass[J].Mountain Research,2015,(4):449.
[10]陈 蝶,卫 伟*,陈利顶,等.梯田生态系统服务与管理研究进展[J].山地学报,2016,(03):374.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000141]
 CHEN Die,WEI Wei,CHEN Liding,et al.Progress of the Ecosystem Services and Management of Terraces[J].Mountain Research,2016,(4):374.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000141]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2020-02-16; 改回日期(Accepted date):2020-07-10
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金项目(41790434); 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室开放研究基金资助项目(2019); 福建农林大学杰出青年科研人才计划项目(xjq2017016)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41790434); Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazard and Surface Processes, Chinese Academy of Sciences(2019); Outstanding Young Scientific Research Project of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(xjq2017016)]
作者简介(Biography):余杭(1997-),女,安徽六安人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:自然地理学。[YU Hang(1997-), female, born in Lu'an, Anhui province, M.Sc. candidate,research on physical geography] E-mail: 15665309598@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author):林勇明(1982-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向:恢复生态学。[LIN Yongming(1982-), male, Ph.D., professor, research on restoration ecology] E-mail: monkey1422@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-30