[1]师 动,朱奇峰,杨勤科*,等.DEM分辨率对坡度算法选择影响的分析[J].山地学报,2020,(6):935-944.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000569]
　SHI Dong,ZHU Qifeng,YANG Qinke*,et al.DEM Resolution Influence on Slope Algorithm Selection[J].Mountain Research,2020,(6):935-944.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000569]
点击复制

DEM分辨率对坡度算法选择影响的分析
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2020年第6期
页码:
935-944
栏目:
山地技术
出版日期:
2020-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
DEM Resolution Influence on Slope Algorithm Selection
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2020)6-935-10
作者:
师 动1; 朱奇峰2; 杨勤科1*; 龙永清1
1. 西北大学 城市与环境学院,西安 710127; 2. 陕西省动物研究所,西安 710032
Author(s):
SHI Dong1; ZHU Qifeng2; YANG Qinke1*; LONG Yongqing1
1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China; 2. Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, Xi'an 710032, China
关键词:
坡度;  算法;  DEM分辨率;  误差;  坡度衰减
Keywords:
slope;  algorithm;  DEM resolution;  error;  slope attenuation
分类号:
P208
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000569
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
坡度是重要的地表形态要素,DEM的分辨率对坡度计算具有十分重要影响。研究DEM分辨率对坡度最优算法选择的影响,对坡度精度评价具有重要意义。本文选取地形复杂的绥德和地形简单的拜泉两个样区,生成10～200 m一系列分辨率的DEM,通过对比坡度计算的误差、坡度的信息熵和坡度衰减,分析Horn(H)算法、Zevenbergen(Z)算法、Evans-Young(EY)算法、Sobel(Sb)算法和Sharpnack(Sp)算法这五种坡度算法随DEM分辨率变化的表现,认识理解分辨率对坡度算法选择的影响。结果表明:(1)根据误差结果,各种分辨率下EY算法均为最优; 根据信息熵和坡度衰减(平均值、标准差)结果,各种分辨率下H算法均为最优;(2)DEM分辨率对算法的影响主要表现在其坡度计算结果的差异程度上。在高分辨率时,不同算法得到的坡度结果差异不大; 而在低分辨率时坡度结果的差异很大,宜使用推荐的算法;(3)随DEM分辨率降低,五种算法得到的坡度均发生衰减,但衰减程度不同,其中H算法衰减最小。(4)在实际坡度计算时,若重点关注坡度的精度,则优先考虑选用EY算法; 若重点关注低分辨率情形下坡度的衰减,则优先考虑选用H算法。研究结果对不同分辨率下坡度算法选择和坡度精度评价均具有十分重要的意义,这还为地学模型提供了更精确的坡度数据。
Abstract:
The DEM-based calculation of slope, as an essential terrain variable, is affected by DEM resolution. The influence of DEM resolution on optimal slope algorithm should be studied to improve the slope calculation accuracy. In this paper, two study areas Suide with complex terrain and Baiquan with simple terrain in China were selected to generate a series of DEMs with resolutions ranging from 10 m to 200 m. Then, the slope calculation error, the slope entropy, and slope attenuation of five slope algorithms, including the Horn(H), the Zevenbergen(Z), the Evans - Young(EY), the Sobel(Sb), and the Sharpnack(Sp)algorithms were compared with DEM resolutions to understand the resolution influence on slope algorithm selection. The results obtained:(1)In each case according to the error results, the EY algorithm was the best choice in each resolution. In contrast, according to entropy and the mean and standard deviations of slope attenuation results, the H algorithm was the best choice in each resolution.(2)The DEM resolution influence on the algorithm could be mainly reflected in different slope difference results. The slope results obtained by different algorithms for high resolutions were not entirely different, while those calculated for low resolutions were quite different. Thus, the optimal algorithm should be utilized in low-resolution cases.(3)As DEM resolution became coarser, the slope results calculated by these five algorithms attenuated. However, different degrees of slope attenuation could be obtained with different algorithms, while the minimum attenuation was obtained with the H algorithm.(4)In practical slope calculation, the EY algorithm was preferred if the slope calculation accuracy was focused, while the H algorithm could be utilized if the slope reduction was considered in low-resolution DEM-based calculation. The research results were of great significance for slope algorithm selection at different resolutions and slope accuracy evaluation under different resolutions. Moreover, they provided more accurate slope data for geoscience models.

参考文献/References:

[1] OLAYA V. Basic land-surface parameters[M]// HENGL T, REUTER H. Geomorphometry concepts, software, applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009:141-170.
[2] FLORINSKY I V. Digital terrain analysis in soil science and geology [M]. 2nd ed. Elsevier Science: New York, 2016: 17-26.
[3] SHAN Linxin, YANG Xihua, ZHU Qinggaozi. Effects of DEM resolutions on LS and hillslope erosion estimation in a burnt landscape[J]. Soil Research, 2019, 57(7):797-804.
[4] 郭长宝,唐杰,吴瑞安,等.基于证据权模型的川藏铁路加查——朗县段滑坡易发性评价[J]. 山地学报,2019, 37(2):240-251. [GUO Changbao, TANG Jie, WU Ruian, et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment based on WOE model along Jiacha——Langxian county section of Sichuan —Tibet railway, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(2):240-251]
[5] 刘永垚,第宝锋,詹宇,等. 基于随机森林模型的泥石流易发性评价——以汶川地震重灾区为例[J]. 山地学报,2018,36(5):765-773. [LIU Yongyao, DI Baofeng, ZHAN Yu, et al. Debris flows susceptibility assessment in Wenchuan earthquake areas based on random forest algorithm model[J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(5):765-773]
[6] LI Fuqin, JUPP D L B, THANKAPPAN M. Issues in the application of digital surface model data to correct the terrain illumination effects in landsat images [J]. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2013, 8(3):235-257.
[7] 张宏鸣,杨勤科,王猛,等. 梯田区侵蚀地形因子随DEM分辨率变化的特征分析[J]. 农业机械学报,2017,48(10):177-184. [ZHANG Hongming, YANG Qinke, WANG Meng, et al. Analysis of DEM resolution on erosional terrain characteristic of terrace area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(10): 177-184]
[8] MUKHERIEE S, MUKHERJEE S, GARG D A, et al. Evaluation of topographic index in relation to terrain roughness and DEM grid spacing[J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2013, 122(3):869-886.
[9] GROHMANN C H. Effects of spatial resolution on slope and aspect derivation for regional-scale analysis [J]. Computers & geosciences, 2015, 77: 111-117.
[10] SHI Dong, YANG Qinke, ZHU Qifeng, et al. Uncertainties and errors in algorithms for elevation gradients[J/OL]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2020:1-25 [2020-06-03]. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1766047.
[11] 李思进,代文,熊礼阳,等. DEM分辨率对黄土侵蚀沟形态特征表达的不确定性分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2020,22(3):338-350. [ LI Sijin, DAI Wen, XIONG Liyang, et al. Uncertainty of the morphological feature expression of loess erosional gully affected by DEM resolution[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2020, 22(3): 338-350]
[12] WANG Chunmei, YANG Qinke, JUPP D L B, et al. Modeling change of topographic spatial structures with DEM resolution using semi-variogram analysis and filter bank[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2016, 5(7): 107-128.
[13] 土祥,王春梅,庞国伟,等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区坡度尺度效应空间分异分析[J]. 山地学报,2018,36(6):964-972. [TU Xiang, WANG Chunmei, PANG Guowei, et al. On the spatial differentiation of scale effect of slopes in Loess Hill and gully region, China [J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(6):146-154]
[14] 刘飞,范建容,崔兆岩,等. 基于DEM分形特征的坡度尺度变换模型[J]. 山地学报,2019, 37(1):129-136. [LIU Fei, FAN Jianrong, CUI Zhaoyan, et a1. A model of re-scaling slope based on DEM fractal feature[J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(1):129-136]
[15] 张宏鸣,宋泽鲁,杨江涛,等. DEM超分辨率重构对梯田坡度提取的影响研究[J]. 农业机械学报,2017, 48(1): 112-118. [ZHANG Hongming, SONG Zelu, YANG Jiangtao, et a1. Influence of DEM super-resolution reconstruction on terraced field slope extraction [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017,48(1): 112-118]
[16] FLORINSKY I V. Accuracy of local topographic variables derived from digital elevation models [J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1998, 12(1): 47-62.
[17] 刘学军,卞璐,卢华兴,等. 顾及DEM误差自相关的坡度计算模型精度分析[J]. 测绘学报, 2008, 37(2):200-206. [LIU Xuejun, BIAN Lu, LU Huaxing, et al. The accuracy assessment on slope algorithm with DEM error spatial autocorrelation [J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2008, 37(2): 200-206]
[18] 袁兵,王彬权,袁光银,等. 基于DEM的对称13点局部窗口坡度算法分析[J]. 山地学报, 2019,37(1):137-143. [YUAN Bing, WANG Binquan, YUAN Guangyin, et al. Slope computation analysis of symmetric 13 nodes local window based on grid DEM[J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(1): 137-143]
[19] 刘晓,赵荣,梁勇,等. 顾及地貌与DEM分辨率的坡度算法适应性研究[J]. 测绘科学,2017,42(3):29-34. [LIU Xiao, ZHAO Rong, LIANG Yong, et al. Research of algorithms for deriving slope based on different geomorphic types and DEM resolution[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2017, 42(3): 29-34]
[20] GB/T 17278-2009. 数字地形图产品基本要求[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2009. [GB/T 17278-2009. Basic requirement for products of digital topographic map[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2009]
[21] 何珊,王春梅,杨勤科. 1:50000 DLG建立DEM适宜栅格尺寸的确定[J]. 山地学报,2017,35(4):572-579. [HE Shan, WANG Chunmei, YANG Qinke. Optimizing cellsize for DEM generation with 1:50000 DLG [J]. Mountain Research, 2017, 35(4): 572-579]
[22] YANG Qinke, MCVICAR T R, VANNIEL T G, et al. Improving a digital elevation model by reducing source data errors and optimising interpolation algorithm parameters: an example in the Loess Plateau, China [J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, 2007, 9(3): 235-246.
[23] 李天文. 现代测量学[M]. 2版. 北京:科学出版社,2014:142-158. [LI Tianwen. Modern surveying [M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2014: 142-158]
[24] 朱奇峰,杨勤科,龙永清,等. 高程梯度性质和算法不确定性的初步分析[J]. 水土保持研究,2017,24(4):19-26. [ZHU Qifeng, YANG Qinke, LONG Yongqing, et al. Preliminary properties and precision analysis of elevation gradient algorithm [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 24(4):19-26]
[25] 刘爱利,王培法,丁园圆. 地统计学概论[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012:14-24. [LIU Aili, WANG Peifa, DING Yuanyuan. The introduction to Geostatistics [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012: 14-24]
[26] 陶旸,汤国安,王春,等. DEM子集划分对地形信息量计算的影响研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2009, 34(12):1463-1466. [TAO Yang, TANG Guoan, WANG Chun, et al. Influence of DEM subset partition on terrain information content[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009, 34(12):1463-1466]
[27] SKIDMORE A K. Evolution of methods for estimating slope gradient and aspect from digital elevation models[M]//FISHER P. Classics from IJGIS: twenty years of the international journal of geographical information science and systems. Boca Raton: Taylor and Fracis Group, 2007: 111-118.
[28]BORRELLI P, ROBINSON D A, FLEISCHER L R, et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1):1-13.
[29] TENG H, ROSSEL R A V, SHI Z, et al. Assimilating satellite imagery and visible-near infrared spectroscopy to model and map soil loss by water erosion in Australia[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 77:156-167.
[30]黄婷婷,史扬子,曹琦,等. 黄土高原六道沟小流域近30年来土壤侵蚀变化评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(1): 8-17.[HUANG Tingting, SHI Yangzi, CAO Qi, et al. Soil erosion evaluation of Liudaogou catchment in the Loess Plateau during the past 30 years[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 18(1):8-17]
[31] 罗仪宁. DEM表面地形突变特征表达方法研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2011:17-23. [LUO Yining. Study on the representation method of discontinuous terrain features on the DEM surface[D]. Xi'an: Northwest University, 2011:17-23]
[32] TAROLLI P, MUDD S M. Remote sensing in geomorphology[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020: 317-338.

相似文献/References:

[1]张子瑜,范建容,张建强,等.芦山地震重灾区地形因子分析[J].山地学报,2013,(05):624.
　ZHANG Ziyu,FAN Jianrong,ZHANG Jianqiang,et al.Topographic Factors Analysis of Lushan Earthquakehit Area[J].Mountain Research,2013,(6):624.
[2]胡卓玮,李洋,王志恒,等.基于DEM的四川省低山丘陵区坡度提取不确定性分析[J].山地学报,2012,(05):636.
　HU Zhuowei,LI Yang,WANG Zhiheng.Uncertainty Analysis Extracting from the Slope of Hilly Area of Sichuan Province Based on DEM[J].Mountain Research,2012,(6):636.
[3]罗云云,李瑞雪,屈明.重庆石碗溪小流域坡度和高程对土地利用及经济发展的影响[J].山地学报,2004,(02):254.
[4]李天文,刘学军,汤国安.地形复杂度对坡度坡向的影响[J].山地学报,2004,(03):272.
[5]曾凡伟,徐刚,李青,等.坡度阀值与坡面泥石流——以重庆市北碚区为例[J].山地学报,2004,(05):568.
[6]王春,汤国安,张婷,等.在降雨侵蚀中黄土地面坡度变化的高分辨研究[J].山地学报,2005,(05):589.
[7]乔建平,吴彩燕,田宏岭,等.长江三峡库区云阳-巫山段斜坡坡度对滑坡的贡献率[J].山地学报,2007,(02):207.
[8]封磊,洪伟,吴承祯,等.武夷山黄山松林主要种群生态位特征[J].山地学报,2008,(03):308.
[9]杨青青,王克林,陈洪松,等.地质地貌因素对喀斯特石漠化的影响——以广西大化县为例[J].山地学报,2009,(03):311.
[10]张志明,孙长青,欧晓昆,等.退耕还林政策对山地植被空间格局变化的驱动分析[J].山地学报,2009,(05):513.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2020-06-08; 改回日期(Accepted date):2020-07-15
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金(41371274,41601290)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41371274,41601290)]
作者简介(Biography):师动(1992-),女,陕西咸阳人,博士研究生,主要研究方向:地理信息科学。[SHI Dong(1992-), female, born in Xianyang, Shaanxi province, Ph.D. candidate, research on geographic information science] E-mail: shidongsd@stumail.nwu.edu.cn
*通讯作者(Corresponding author):杨勤科(1962-),男,陕西陇县人,博士,教授,主要研究方向:区域土壤侵蚀评价和侵蚀地形分析。[YANG Qinke(1962-), male, born in Longxian, Shaanxi province, Ph.D., professor, research on regional soil erosion evaluation and erosion topography analysis] E-mail: qkyang@nwu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-11-30