[1]张羿轲,方一平*,杨 悦,等.岷江上游山区生态福祉波动的人类活动干扰研究[J].山地学报,2021,(2):238-247.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000591]
 ZHANG Yike,FANG Yiping*,YANG Yue,et al.Disturbance of Human Activities to Mountain Ecological Well-Being Fluctuation in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River, China[J].Mountain Research,2021,(2):238-247.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000591]
点击复制

岷江上游山区生态福祉波动的人类活动干扰研究()
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2021年第2期
页码:
238-247
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2021-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Disturbance of Human Activities to Mountain Ecological Well-Being Fluctuation in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2021)2-238-10
作者:
张羿轲12 方一平12*杨 悦12徐 云1
1.中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都 610041; 2.中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
Author(s):
ZHANG Yike12FANG Yiping12*YANG Yue12 XU Yun1
1. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
关键词:
山区生态系统 生态福祉效率 时空异质性 人类活动干扰 岷江上游
Keywords:
mountain ecosystems ecological well-being efficiency temporal and spatial heterogeneity disturbance of human activities the upper reaches of the Minjiang River
分类号:
X826; X171.1
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000591
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
探究人类活动对生态福祉的影响机制与作用规律,实现对人类活动的有效调控,是维持地区环境与社会经济可持续发展的重要途径。现有研究主要聚焦于人类活动干扰导致区域生态格局产生变化的过程和原因等,而相对缺乏人类活动与区域生态福祉间的相关性研究。本文利用当量因子法、突变理论及贬值率模型对岷江上游1995年、2005年和2015年生态福祉进行测度,探究人类活动对生态福祉效率的作用方式。结果显示:(1)研究时段内地区人口增长速率大于生态恢复速率,人均生态福祉除汶川县略有增长外,其他地区均呈降低趋势; 地区消费等量生态系统服务所获得的经济收益逐期增大,各地区生态-经济产出效率均呈上升趋势。(2)人均生态福祉低值中心和高值中心的空间分布与生态-经济产出效率大致相反,呈现此高彼低的态势。(3)Pearson相关分析显示城镇化率与人均生态福祉呈负相关,基础设施密度、城镇化率、科技发展水平和二产业占比等人类活动因子与生态—经济产出效率呈正相关。本研究可为调控人类活动类型、方式及强度,提升当地居民福祉实践提供理论依据。
Abstract:
Ecological well-being is an essential indicator of the natural environment's feedback on the intensity of human activities. Investigating the anthropogenic impact on ecological well-being and effectively regulating human activities is crucial for ensuring sustainable development of the regional environment and social economy. This paper explored the impact of human activities on the efficiency of ecological well-being using the equivalent factor method, catastrophe theory, and depreciation rate model to quantify the ecological well-being in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River in 1995, 2005, and 2015. The findings indicate that:(1)The per capita ecological well-being showed a decreasing trend during the study period for all regions except Wenchuan county, indicating that the population growth rate was greater than the ecological restoration rate. The eco-economic output efficiency of all regions showed an increasing trend implying that the economic benefits gained by consuming the same amount of ecosystem services have gradually increased.(2)The spatial distribution of the low-value and high-value centers of per capita ecological well-being was roughly opposite to the eco-economic output efficiency. Areas with low ecological economic efficiency were characterized by high per capita ecological well-being.(3)Pearson correlation analysis revealed that the urbanization rate was negatively correlated with per capita ecological well-being. Infrastructure density, urbanization rate, technological development level and the proportion of secondary industries were positively correlated with eco-economic production performance. This paper provides a theoretical basis for regulating the types, methods and intensity of human activities for improving regional ecological well-being. Nevertheless, ecological well-being is affected by climate change, human activities, and policy orientation impact, necessitating broader follow-up studies.

参考文献/References:

[1] BÜRGI M, SCHULER A. Driving forces of forest management — an analysis of regeneration practices in the forests of the Swiss Central Plateau during the 19th and 20th century [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 176(1): 173-183. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00270-0
[2] CHOWDHURY R R. Landscape change in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: Modeling the driving forces of smallholder deforestation in land parcels [J]. Applied Geography, 2005, 26(2): 129-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.004
[3] 欧阳志云,徐卫华,肖燚,等. 中国生态系统格局、质量、服务与演变[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2017:265-278. [OUYNAG Zhiyun, XU Weihua, XIAO Yi, et al. Chinese ecosystem pattern,quality,service and evolution [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017: 265-278]
[4] 刘春霞,李月臣,杨华,等. 三峡库区重庆段生态与环境敏感性综合评价[J]. 地理学报,2011,66(5):631-642. [LIU Chunxia, LI Yuechen, YANG Hua, et al. RS and GIS-based assessment for eco-environmental sensitivity of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Chongqing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(5): 631-642] DOI: 10.11821/xb201105006
[5] 安毅,刘世梁,侯笑云,等. 人类活动的景观生态响应——以个旧市为例[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(24): 8861-8872. [AN Yi, LIU Shiliang, HOU Xiaoyun, et al. Research on landscape ecological effects of human activity: A case study of Gejiu City [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(24): 8861-8872] DOI: 10.5846 /stxb2018058311206
[6] CLAESSENS L, SCHOORL J M, VERBURG P H, et al. Modelling interactions and feedback mechanisms between land use change and landscape processes [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2008, 129(1): 157-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.008
[7] TANG S M, FRANKLIN J F, MONTGOMERY D R. Forest harvest patterns and landscape disturbance processes [J]. Landscape Ecology, 1997, 12(6): 349-363. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007929523070
[8] BRESEE M K, MOINE J L, MATHER S, et al. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in the Chequamegon National Forest Wisconsin, USA, from 1972 to 2001 [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19(3): 291-309. DOI: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000030419.27883.40
[9] 朱会义,李秀彬. 关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J]. 地理学报,2003,58(5):643-650. [ZHU Huiyi, LI Xiubin. Discussion on the index method of regional land use change [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(5): 643-650] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2003.05.001
[10] 臧正,邹欣庆. 基于生态系统服务理论的生态福祉内涵表征与评价[J]. 应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1085-1094. [ZANG Zheng, ZOU Xinqing. Connotation characterization and evaluation of ecological well-being based on ecosystem service theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(4): 1085-1094] DOI: 10. 13287/j.1001-9332.201604.003
[11] 王青,石敏球,郭亚琳,等. 岷江上游山区聚落生态位垂直分异研究[J]. 地理学报,2013,68(11):1559-1567. [WANG Qing, SHI Minqiu, GUO Yalin, et al. The vertical differentiation of the mountain settlement niche in the upper reaches of Minjiang River [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(11): 1559-1567] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201311011
[12] 王伟栋,张嫩江,张杰. 定牧草原聚落生态系统视角下草原生态退化机理研究[J]. 生态经济,2018,34(5):189-194. [WANG Weidong, ZHANG Nenjiang, ZHANG Jie. Study on the prairie ecological degradation from the perspective of prairie human settlement ecological system [J]. Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(5): 189-194]
[13] 赵生龙,左小安,张铜会,等. 乌拉特荒漠草原群落物种多样性和生物量关系对放牧强度的响应[J]. 干旱区研究,2020,37(1):168-177. [ZHAO Shenglong, ZUO Xiaoan, ZHANG Tonghui, et al. Response of the relationship between community species diversity and aboveground biomass to grazing intensity in the Urat Desert Steppe in north China [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(1):168-177] DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2020.01.19
[14] 孙鸿超,张正祥. 吉林省松花江流域景观格局脆弱性变化及其驱动力[J]. 干旱区研究,2019,36(4):1005-1014. [SUN Hongchao, ZHANG Zhengxiang. Change of landscape pattern vulnerability in the Songhua River Basin in Jilin province and its driving forces [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(4): 1005-1014] DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2019.04.26
[15] 李玲,张福平,冯起,等. 环青海湖地区草地对气候变化和人类活动的响应[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(4):1157-1165. [LI Ling, ZHANG Fuping, FENG Qi, et al. Responses of grassland to climate change and human activities in the area around Qinghai Lake [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(4): 1157-1165] DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201904.032
[16] 吴艳艳,吴志峰,余世孝. 定量评价人类活动对净初级生产力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2017,28(8):2535-2544. [WU Yanyan, WU Zhifeng, YU Shixiao. Quantitative assessment of the impacts of human activities on net primary productivity [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(8): 2535-2544]DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201708.019
[17] 张继飞,邓伟,朱昌丽,等. 岷江上游生态系统服务与居民福祉的空间关联及其动态特征[J]. 山地学报,2017,35(3):388-398. [ZHANG Jifei, DENG Wei, ZHU Changli, et al. Spatial relationship and its dynamic features of ecosystem services and human wellbeing in the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River [J]. Mountain Research, 2017, 35(3):388-398] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000235
[18] 樊敏. 岷江上游山地生态系统服务地域分异过程与补偿阈值[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(10):1289-1298. [FAN Min. Regional differentiation of mountainous ecosystem services and ecological compensation thresholds in the upstream of Minjiang River [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(10): 1289-1298] DOI: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2019.0164
[19] 祝聪,彭文甫,张丽芳,等. 2006—2016年岷江上游植被覆盖度时空变化及驱动力[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(5):1583-1594. [ZHU Cong, PENG Wenfu, ZHANG Lifang, et al. Study of temporal and spatial variation and driving force of fractional vegetation cover in upper reaches of Minjiang River from 2006 to 2016 [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(5):1583-1594] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201805040993
[20] 樊敏,李富程,郭亚琳,等. 退耕还林对岷江上游高山聚落区生态服务价值变化的影响[J]. 山地学报,2016,34(3):356-365. [FAN Min, LI Fucheng, GUO Yalin, et al. Effects of grain for green project on changes in ecosystems service values of alpine settlement area in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River [J]. Mountain Research, 2016, 34(3): 356-365] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000139
[21] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254. [XIE Gaodi, ZHANG Caixia, ZHANG Leiming, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254] DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001
[22] 臧正. 滨海湿地生态系统与区域福祉的双向耦合关系研究——以盐城为例[D]. 南京:南京大学,2018:116-117. [ZANG Zheng. The bidirectional coupling relationship between coastal wetland ecosystem and regional welfare: A case study in Yancheng [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2018: 116-117]
[23] 张晖,吴霜,张燕媛,等. 流域生态补偿政策对受偿地区经济增长的影响研究——以安徽省黄山市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(12):2848-2856. [ZHANG Hui, WU Shuang, ZHANG Yanyuan, et al. Effect of watershed eco-compensation mechanism on economic growth in compensation area: Take Huangshan city as an example [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(12):2848-2856] DOI: 10.11870 /cjlyzyyhj201912006
[24] 杨灿,朱玉林. 绿色发展视阈下湖南省生态足迹的驱动力因素分析[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(4):195-203. [YANG Can, ZHU Yulin. Driving force factors of ecological footprint in Hunan province from the perspective of green development [J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(4):195-203] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.04.022
[25] 徐志刚,庄大方,杨琳. 区域人类活动强度定量模型的建立与应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2009,11(4):452-460. [XU Zhigang, ZHUANG Dafang, YANG Lin. Construction and application of regional quantitative model of human activity intensity [J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2009, 11(4): 452-460] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2009.04.007
[26] DE GROOT R S, WILSON M A, BOUMANS R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-408. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
[27] European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations and World Bank. System of national accounts:SNA 2008 [EB/OL]. [2021-04-23]. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/ docs/SNA2008.pdf
[28] 欧阳志云,朱春全,杨广斌,等. 生态系统生产总值核算:概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(21):6747-6761. [OUYANG Zhiyun, ZHU Chunquan, YANG Guangbin, et al. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201310092428
[29] 刘慧,刘波,许霞,等. 基于突变理论的湖南衡阳暴雨灾害风险评估[J]. 灾害学,2019,34(3):221-226. [LIU Hui, LIU Bo, XU Xia, et al. Risk assessment of rainstorm disaster based on catastrophe theory in Hengyang of Hunan province [J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2019, 34(3):221-226] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2019.03.040
[30] 臧正,邹欣庆,吴雷,等. 基于公平与效率视角的中国大陆生态福祉及生态—经济效率评价[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(7):2403-2414. [ZANG Zheng, ZOU Xinqing, WU Lei, et al. Evaluation of ecological well-being and eco-economic efficiency in the Chinese mainland: From the perspective of justice and efficiency [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(7): 2403-2414] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201601040014
[31] HAN Han, LI Huimin, ZHANG Kaize. Spatial-temporal coupling analysis of the coordination between urbanization and water ecosystem in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(3757): 1-18.DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193757
[32] CHIKARAISHI M, FUJIWARA A, KANEKO S, et al. The moderating effects of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions: A latent class modeling approach [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2015, 90(1): 302-317. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.025
[33] MARTELLOZZO F, AMATO F, MURGANTE B, et al. Modelling the impact of urban growth on agriculture and natural land in Italy to 2030 [J]. Applied Geography, 2018, 91(2): 156-167. DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.12.004
[34] 胡雷,王军锋. 我国城镇化对二氧化碳排放的长期影响和短期波动效应分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(8):94-100. [HU Lei, WANG Junfeng. Analysis of the long-term impact of carbon dioxide emissions and short-term fluctuation effect of urbanization in China [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(8):94-100] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.255
[35] 史建军. 城镇化进程中生态环境响应的时空分异及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(5):60-66. [SHI Jianjun. Spatial-temporal differences of eco-environment in response to urbanization and the influence factors [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(5): 60-66] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2019.139
[36] SONG Guobao, LI Mingjing, SEMAKULA H M, et al. Food consumption and waste and the embedded carbon, water and ecological footprints of households in China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 529(5): 191-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.068
[37] 诸大建,张帅. 生态福利绩效及其与经济增长的关系研究[J]. 中国人口?资源与环境,2014,24(9):59-67. [ZHU Dajian, ZHANG Shuai. Research on ecological wellbeing performance and its relationship with economic growth [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(9):59-67] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2014.09.009
[38] 张荣天,焦华富. 泛长江三角洲地区经济发展与生态环境耦合协调关系分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(5):719-727. [ZHANG Rongtian, JIAO Huafu. Coupling and coordinating between economic development and ecological environment in the Pan Yangtze River Delta [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(5):719-727] DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201505002
[39] 赵雪雁. 甘肃省经济发展与环境质量的交互耦合关系[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(6):1-7. [ZHAO Xueyan. Analysis on coupling relationships between economic development and environment quality in Gansu [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2008, 22(6):1-7] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.Jalre.2008.06.029
[40] 郑德凤,王燕燕,刘晓星,等. 基于生态系统服务的中国生态福祉区划时空格局与潜力分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(5):645-653. [ZHENG Defeng, WANG Yanyan, LIU Xiaoxing, et al. Temporal-spatial pattern and potential analysis of China's ecological well-being zone based on ecosystem services [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(5):645-653] DOI: 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2019.0249

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2020-06-27; 改回日期(Accepted date):2021-04-19
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金(41571523,41671152)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41571523,41671152)]
作者简介(Biography):张羿轲(1995-),女,四川成都人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:山区产业与区域发展。[ZHANG Yike(1995-), female, born in Chengdu, Sichuan province, M.Sc. candidate, research on mountain industry and regional development] E-mail: zhangyk0609@foxmail.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author):方一平(1965-),男,博士,研究员,主要研究方向:产业生态效率、环境变化适应和山区可持续性。[FANG Yiping(1965-), male, Ph.D., professor, research on industrial eco-efficiency, environmental change and adaptation, and mountain sustainability] E-mail: ypfang@imde.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-30