[1]税 伟*,孙 祥,李 慧,等.植物功能性状对喀斯特退化天坑内外生境的响应[J].山地学报,2022,(4):516-530.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000690]
　SHUI Wei*,SUN Xiang,LI Hui,et al.Responses of Plant Functional Traits to Habitats Inside and Outside the Degraded Karst Tiankengs[J].Mountain Research,2022,(4):516-530.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000690]
点击复制

植物功能性状对喀斯特退化天坑内外生境的响应
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2022年第4期
页码:
516-530
栏目:
山地环境
出版日期:
2022-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Responses of Plant Functional Traits to Habitats Inside and Outside the Degraded Karst Tiankengs
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2022)4-516-15
作者:
税 伟*; 孙 祥; 李 慧; 刘橼锰; 冯 洁
福州大学 环境与安全工程学院, 福州 350116
Author(s):
SHUI Wei*;  SUN Xiang;  LI Hui;  LIU Yuanmeng;  FENG Jie
College of Environment and Safety Engineering. FuZhou University. Fuzhou 350116, China
关键词:
叶功能性状;  喀斯特天坑;  土壤因子;  生态恢复
Keywords:
leaf functional traits;  karst tiankeng;  soil factors;  ecological restoration
分类号:
Q948
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000690
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
分析喀斯特退化天坑内外植物功能性状特征及其与非生物因素的内在关系,揭示植物群落对天坑生境的适应机制,对喀斯特生态脆弱区的植被多样性维持与保护具有重要的指导意义。由于天坑区域地形复杂、采样难度较大,已有关于天坑植物群落研究多集中于物种的分布特征方面,对植物功能性状的研究较少,尤其是从功能性状生态学视角探究植物功能性状变异对天坑内外生境的响应研究更为缺乏,不利于揭示植物对退化天坑生境的生态策略,难以科学指导喀斯特区域的植被生态恢复与重建。本文以云南沾益天坑群中的巴家陷塘天坑和深陷塘天坑为例,采用相关性分析、多元逐步回归分析和冗余分析方法研究坑内坑外植物功能性状特征、土壤因子差异及二者的相关关系。结果表明:(1)天坑内外的土壤pH、全钾、铵态氮、有效磷等因子之间具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。土壤全氮和土壤有机质是影响坑内叶功能性状的主要因子,土壤全磷是影响坑外叶功能性状的主要因子。(2)坑内乔木的叶长、叶宽、叶面积、比叶面积显著大于坑外乔木(P<0.05),坑外灌木的叶干物质含量显著大于坑内灌木(P<0.05),坑内与坑外各功能性状之间存在一定的相关性。(3)坑外灌木叶面积种间变异程度最大(117.36%),叶干物质含量种间变异程度最小(13.04%)。天坑内外各乔灌层种间变异程度最大的均是叶面积,最小的均是叶干物质含量。(4)坑内物种生态位重叠度较大,竞争排斥是植物群落构建的主导作用,而坑外生境条件恶劣,环境过滤是植物群落构建的主导作用。研究结果可为喀斯特天坑内外及云贵高原喀斯特生态脆弱区域的植被生态恢复和物种保护提供科学依据。
Abstract:
It is essential to analyze the plant functional traits inside and outside the degraded karst tiankengs and their intrinsic relationships with abiotic factors, and to reveal the flora adaptation mechanisms to karst tiankeng habitats, which are of great guidance for the maintenance and conservation of vegetation diversity in karst eco-fragile areas. Due to complex topography in karst tiankeng it is difficult to travel on feet. Most studies on karst tiankeng flora focused on the distribution characteristics, little attention was paid on plant functional traits, especially on the response of plant functional trait variation to inside and outside tiankeng habitats through the perspective of functional trait ecology, which is not beneficial in revealing the ecological strategies of plants for degraded karst tiankengs' habitats and makes it difficult to scientifically guide the ecological restoration and reconstruction of vegetation in karst areas. Based on the analysis of correlation, multiple stepwise regression as well as redundancy analysis, this study took the degraded karst tiankeng Bajiaxiantang and Shenxiantang in Zhanyi tiankeng group, Yunnan province as examples, to explore the plant functional trait characteristics, soil factors differences, and the relationship between them inside and outside the tiankengs. The results show that:(1)Significant differences were found among soil pH, total potassium(TK), ammonium nitrogen(AN), and available phosphorus(AP)inside and outside the tiankeng(P<0.05). Leaf functional traits inside the tiankeng were mainly influenced by soil total nitrogen(TN)and soil organic matter(SOM). Soil total phosphorus(TP)was the main contributor outside the tiankengs.(2)Leaf length(LL), leaf width(LW), leaf area(LA), and specific leaf area(SLA)of the trees in the tiankeng were significantly greater than those of the trees outside the tiankeng(P<0.05). Leaf dry matter content(LDMC)of the shrubs outside the tiankeng was significantly greater than those of the shrubs inside the tiankeng(P<0.05), and there were correlations between each functional trait inside and outside the tiankeng.(3)Shrubs outside the tiankeng had the highest degree interspecific variation in leaf area(117.36%), and the least interspecific variation in leaf dry matter content(13.04%). The greatest interspecific variation among trees and shrubs inside and outside the tiankeng was the leaf area, and the smallest was leaf dry matter content.(4)The species niches overlap in the tiankeng was high, and competitive exclusion was the dominant role. While the habitat conditions outside the tiankeng were harsh, environmental filtration was the dominant factor in community assembly. The findings can provide a scientific basis for the ecological restoration and species conservation in karst eco-fragile regions.

参考文献/References:

[1] 简小枚,税伟,陈毅萍,等.云南中度退化的喀斯特天坑草地植物群落优势种种间关系[J].应用生态学报,2018, 29(2): 492-500. [JIAN Xiaomei, SHUI Wei, CHEN Yiping, et al. Interspecific relationships of dominant species in the grassland community of moderately degraded tiankeng of Yunnan, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(2): 492-500] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201802.005
[2] 税伟,陈毅萍,王雅文,等.中国喀斯特天坑研究起源、进展与展望[J]. 地理学报,2015, 70(3): 431-446. [SHUI Wei, CHEN Yiping, WANG Yawen, et al. Origination, study progress and prospect of karst tiankeng research in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(3): 431-446] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201503007
[3] 朱学稳,陈伟海.中国的喀斯特天坑[J].中国溶岩,2006,25(S1): 7-24. [ZHU Xuewen, CHEN Weihai. Tiankengs in the karst of China [J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2006,25(S1): 7-24] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4810.2006.z1.003
[4] 税伟,陈毅萍,简小枚,等.喀斯特原生天坑植物群落空间格局特征——以云南沾益天坑为例[J]. 应用生态学报,2018, 29(6): 1725-1735. [SHUI Wei, CHEN Yiping, JIAN Xiaomei, et al. Spatial pattern of plant community in original karst tiankeng: A case study of Zhanyi tiankeng in Yunnan, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(6): 1725-1735] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201806.010
[5] 冯洁,江聪,税伟,等.喀斯特退化天坑阴坡阳坡壳斗科植物的功能性状特征[J].应用生态学报,2021, 32(7): 2301-2308. [FENG Jie, JIANG Cong, SHUI Wei, et al. Functional traits of Fagaceae plants in shady and sunny slopes in karst degraded tiankeng [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(7): 2301-2308] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.021
[6] 余林兰,罗奕杏,薛跃规,等.神木天坑不同小生境木本植物叶功能性状的差异与关联[J/OL].广西植物, 2022:1-12 [2022-08-31] https: //kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/45.1134.Q.20220601.1304.010.html. [YU Linlan, LUO Yixing, XUE Yuegui, et al. Differences and correlations in leaf functional traits of woody plants in various microhabitats of Shenmu Tiankeng [J/OL]. Guihaia, 2022:1-12 [2022-08-31] https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/45.1134.Q.20220601.1304.010.html] DOI: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202112046
[7] 税伟,郭平平,朱粟锋,等.云南喀斯特退化天坑木本植物功能性状变异特征及适应策略[J/OL]. 地理科学, 2022:1-12 [2022-08-31].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1124.P.20220809.1721.016.html. [SHUI Wei, GUO Pingping, ZHU Sufeng, et al. Variation of plant functional traits and adaptive strategy of woody species in degraded karst tiankeng of Yunnan province [J/OL]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022:1-12 [2022-08-31]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1124.P.20220809.1721.016.html]
[8] 郭平平,税伟,江聪,等.退化天坑倒石坡林下优势物种生态位特征[J].应用生态学报,2019, 30(11): 3635-3645. [GUO Pingping, SHUI Wei, JIANG Cong, et al. Niche characteristics of understory dominant species of talus slope in degraded tiankeng [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(11): 3635-3645] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201911.007
[9] 税伟,陈毅萍,简小枚,等.喀斯特原生天坑垂直梯度上植物多样性特征——以云南沾益天坑为例[J].山地学报,2018, 36(1): 53-62. [SHUI Wei, CHEN Yiping, JIAN Xiaomei, et al. Plant diversity characteristics of original karst tiankeng along vertical gradient: A case study of Zhanyi tiankeng in Yunnan province, China [J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(1): 53-62] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000300
[10] 王飞,郭树江,樊宝丽,等.不同年代梭梭叶功能性状差异及其与土壤因子的关系[J].草业科学,2020, 37(12): 2486-2496. [WANG Fei, GUO Shujiang, FAN Baoli, et al. Variation in leaf functional traits of different-aged Haloxylon Ammodendron communities, and the relationship with soil factors [J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(12): 2486-2496] DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2020-0266
[11] WRIGHT I J, REICH P B, WESTOBY M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J]. Nature, 2004, 428: 821-827. DOI: 10.1038/nature02403
[12] 黄林娟,于燕妹,安小菲,等. 广西大石围天坑群天坑森林主要木本植物种间关联性研究[J]. 广西植物,2021, 41(5): 695-706. [HUANG Linjuan, YU Yanmei, AN Xiaofei, et al. Interspecific association of main woody plants in tiankeng forests of Dashiwei Tiankeng Group, Guangxi [J]. Guihaia, 2021, 41(5): 695-706] DOI: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202008028
[13] 朱粟锋,江聪,税伟,等. 退化天坑倒石堆阴坡植物群落垂直分布特征——以云南沾益深陷塘为例[J].应用生态学报,2020, 31(5): 1496-1504. [ZHU Sufeng, JIANG Cong, SHUI Wei, et al. Vertical distribution characteristics of plant community in shady slope of degraded tiankeng talus: A case study of Zhanyi Shenxiantang in Yunnan, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(5): 1496-1504] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202005.004
[14] 陈毅萍,江聪,简小枚,等.云南沾益中度退化天坑草地植物群落水平空间分布特征[J].生态学报,2018, 38(22): 8008-8021. [CHEN Yiping, JIANG Cong, JIAN Xiaomei, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of grassland plant communities in a moderately degraded tiankeng in Zhanyi, Yunnan [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(22): 8008-8021] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201801150109
[15] SHUI Wei, CHEN Yiping, JIAN Xiaomei, et al. Original karst tiankeng with underground virgin forest as an inaccessible refugia originated from a degraded surface flora in Yunnan, China [J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 9408.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13678-0
[16] 刘培亮,郭垚鑫,李忠虎,等.汉中天坑群两种植物分布新记录[J].中国岩溶,2019, 38(2):292-294. [LIU Peiliang, GUO Yaoxin, LI Zhonghu, et al. Two newly recorded plants the Hanzhong Tiankeng group [J]. Carsologica Sincia, 2019, 38(2):292-294] DOI: 10.11932/karst20190215
[17] 唐启明,冯超,韦玉梅.中国藓类植物新记录种——莫氏疣壶藓[J].西北植物学报,2018, 38(8): 1562-1566. [TANG Qiming, FENG Chao, WEI Yumei. Gymnostomiella monodii P. de la Varde(Pottiaceae, Bryophyta)reported new to China [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(8): 1562-1566] DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2018.08.1562
[18] 党桂兰,冯慧喆,唐启明,等.广西植物新分布[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2016, 34(2): 147-150. [DANG Guilan, FENG Huizhe, TANG Qiming, et al. New recorded plant species in Guangxi, China [J]. Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 34(2): 147-150] DOI: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2016.02.022
[19] 朱成豪,唐健民,邹蓉,等.天坑植物资源研究进展[J].广西科学院学报,2020, 36(1):1-4+16. [ZHU Chenghao, TANG Jianmin, ZOU Rong, et al. Research progress on plant resources in tiankeng [J]. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 2020, 36(1):1-4+16] DOI: 10.13657/j.cnki.gxkxyxb.20200317.005
[20] 于燕妹,黄林娟,薛跃规.广西大石围天坑群不同植物群落的特征[J].植物生态学报,2021, 45(1): 96-103. [YU Yanmei, HUANG Linjuan, XUE Yuegui. Characteristics of different plant communities in the Dashiwei Tiankeng Group, Guangxi, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 45(1): 96-103] DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0237
[21] 吴金,李承义,李小芳,等. 喀斯特天坑内孔雀藓科植物垂直分布特征及其与环境因子关系的研究[J].植物研究,2019, 39(1): 45-53. [WU Jin, LI Chengyi, LI Xiaofang, et al. Vertical distribution of hypopterygiaceae and their relationship with environmental factors in karst tiankeng [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(1): 45-53] DOI: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.01.006
[22] 苏宇乔,薛跃规,范蓓蓓,等. 广西流星天坑植物群落结构与多样性[J]. 西北植物学报,2016, 36(11): 2300-2306. [SU Yuqiao, XUE Yuegui, FAN Beibei, et al. Plant community structure and species diversity in Liuxing Tiankeng of Guangxi [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2016, 36(11): 2300-2306] DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2016.11.2300
[23] 黄林娟,于燕妹,安小菲,等.天坑森林植物群落叶功能性状、物种多样性和功能多样性特征[J/OL].生态学报,2022, 42(24): 1-12 [2022-08-31]. https: //kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2031.Q.20220728.1236.052.html. [HUANG Linjuan, YU Yanmei, AN Xiaofei, et al. Leaf functional traits, species diversity and functional diversity of plant community in Tiankeng forests [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(24): 1-12 [2022-08-31]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2031.Q.20220728.1236.052.html] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202110273025
[24] 刘守江,张斌,杨清伟,等.四川兴文石海小岩湾园区植物群落物种组成与多样性初探[J].亚热带植物科学,2009, 38(1): 37-40. [LIU Shoujiang, ZHANG Bin, YANG Qingwei, et al. Species composition and diversity of plant communities in Xiaoyanwan Garden of Xingwen Karst National Geopark, Sichuan province [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2009, 38(1): 37-40] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2009.01.010
[25] 胡义,唐力,张瑜,等. 陕西汉中天坑群维管植物多样性及区系分析[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2021, 50(3): 208-215. [HU Yi, TANG Li, ZHANG Yu, et al. Analysis on species diversity and flora of vascular plants in Hanzhong Tiankeng Group, Shaanxi province [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2021, 50(3): 208-215] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2021.03.008
[26] PEREZ-HARGUINDEGUY N, DIAZ S, GARNIER E, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide [J]. Australian Journal of Botany, 2013, 61(3): 167-234. DOI: 10.1071/BT12225_CO
[27] KLEIMAN D, AARSSEN L W. The leaf size/number trade-off in trees [J]. The Journal of Ecology, 2007, 95(2): 376-382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01205.x
[28] 宋贺,于鸿莹,陈莹婷,等. 北京植物园不同功能型植物叶经济谱[J]. 应用生态学报,2016, 27(6): 1861-1869. [SONG He, YU Hongying, CHEN Yingting, et al. Leaf economics spectrum among different plant functional types in Beijing Botanical Garden, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(6): 1861-1869] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201606.010
[29] 唐玉瑞,赵成章,赵辉,等. 不同光环境下洮河护岸林沙棘叶干重与叶面积、叶厚度间的关系[J]. 生态学杂志,2021, 40(9): 2745-2753. [TANG Yurui, ZHAO Chengzhang, ZHAO Hui, et al. The relationship between leaf dry mass and leaf area, leaf thickness of Hippophae rhamnoides under different light conditions in Taohe River riparian forest [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(9): 2745-2753] DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202109.014
[30] REICH P B, WRIGHT I J, CAVENDER-BARES J, et al. The evolution of plant functional variation: Traits, spectra, and strategies [J]. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2003, 164(S3): S143-S164.DOI: 10.1086/374368
[31] 路兴慧,丁易,臧润国,等. 海南岛热带低地雨林老龄林木本植物幼苗的功能性状分析[J].植物生态学报,2011, 35(12): 1300-1309. [LU Xinghui, DING,Yi, ZANG Runguo, et al. Analysis of functional traits of woody plant seedlings in an old-growth tropical lowland rain forest on Hainan Island, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(12): 1300-1309] DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01300
[32] 张慧文,马剑英,孙伟,等.不同海拔天山云杉叶功能性状及其与土壤因子的关系[J].生态学报,2010, 30(21): 5747-5758. [ZHANG Huiwen, MA Jianying, SUN Wei, et al. Altitudinal variation in functional traits of Picea Schrenkiana var. Tianschanica and their relationship to soil factors in Tianshan Mountains, northwest China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(21): 5747-5758]
[33] 庞志强,卢炜丽,姜丽莎,等.滇中喀斯特41种不同生长型植物叶性状研究[J].广西植物,2019, 39(8): 1126-1138. [PANG Zhiqiang, LU Weili, JIANG Lisha, et al. Leaf traits of different growing plants in karst area of Shilin, China [J]. Guihaia, 2019, 39(8): 1126-1138] DOI: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201810009
[34] ROZENDAAL D M A, HURTADO V H, POORTER L. Plasticity in leaf traits of 38 tropical tree species in response to light; relationships with light demand and adult stature [J]. Functional Ecology, 2006, 20(2): 207-216. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01105.x
[35] 王飞,郭树江,纪永福,等.不同演替阶段白刺灌丛沙堆土壤因子与叶功能性状关系研究[J].干旱区地理,2022, 45(1): 176-184. [WANG Fei, GUO Shujiang, JI Yongfu, et al. Relationship between soil factors and leaf functional traits of Nitraria tangutorum shrub at different succession stages [J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(1): 176-184] DOI: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.141
[36] 祁建,马克明,张育新.北京东灵山不同坡位辽东栎(Quercus Liaotungensis)叶属性的比较[J].生态学报,2008, 28(1): 122-128. [QI Jian, MA Keming, ZHANG Yuxin. Comparisons on leaf traits of Quercus Liaotungensis Koidz. on different slope positions in Dongling Moutain of Beijing [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(1): 122-128] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.01.014
[37] 何斌,李青,冯图,等.不同林龄马尾松人工林针叶功能性状及其与土壤养分的关系[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2020, 44(2): 181-190. [HE Bin, LI Qing, FENG Tu, et al. Variation in leaf functional traits of different aged Pinus Massoniana communities and relationships with soil nutrients [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(2): 181-190] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904038
[38] 赵新风,徐海量,张鹏,等.养分与水分添加对荒漠草地植物钠猪毛菜功能性状的影响[J].植物生态学报,2014, 38(2): 134-146. [ZHAO Xinfeng, XU Hailiang, ZHANG Peng, et al. Influence of nutrient and water additions on functional traits of Salsola Nitraria in desert grassland [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014, 38(2): 134-146] DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00012
[39] ROCHE P, DIAZ-BURLINSON N, GACHET S. Congruency analysis of species ranking based on leaf traits: Which traits are the more reliable? [J]. Plant Ecology, 2004, 174(1): 37-48. DOI: 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000046056.94523.57
[40] 宝乐,刘艳红.东灵山地区不同森林群落叶功能性状比较[J].生态学报,2009, 29(7): 3692-3703. [BAO Le, LIU Yanhong. Comparison of leaf functional traits in different forest communities in Mt. Dongling of Beijing [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(7): 3692-3703] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn: 1000-0933.2009.07.030
[41] 徐梦琦,高艳菊,张志浩,等. 骆驼刺叶片和根系主要功能性状对水分胁迫的适应[J]. 草业科学,2021, 38(8): 1559-1569. [ XU Mengqi, GAO Yanju, ZHANG Zhihao, et al. Adaptation of the main function trait of Alhagi sparsifolia leaves and roots to soil water stress [J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(8): 1559-1569] DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2021-0092
[42] 周一平,张玉革,马望,等. 氮添加和干旱对呼伦贝尔草原5种植物性状的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2020, 29(1): 41-48. [ZHOU Yiping, ZHANG Yuge, MA Wang, et al. Effects of nitrogen addition and water reduction on the traits of five plants in Hulunbeir Grassland [J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2020, 29(1): 41-48] DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.01.005
[43] 刘双娥,李义勇,方熊,等. 不同氮添加量和添加方式对南亚热带4个主要树种幼苗生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2015, 39(10): 950-961. [LIU Shuang'e, LI Yiyong, FANG Xiong, et al. Effects of the level and regime of nitrogen addition on seedling growth of four major tree species in subtropical China [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(10): 950-961] DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0092
[44] 黄小,姚兰,王进,等. 土壤养分对不同生活型植物叶功能性状的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2018, 38(12): 2293-2302. [HUANG Xiao, YAO Lan, WANG Jin, et al. Effect of soil nutrients on leaf functional traits of different life form plants [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 2293-2302] DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2018.12.2293
[45] 王敬哲,陈志强,陈志彪,等. 南方红壤侵蚀区不同植被恢复年限下芒萁叶功能性状对土壤因子的响应[J].生态学报,2020, 40(3): 900-909. [ WANG Jingzhe, CHEN Zhiqiang, CHEN Zhibiao, et al. Response of functional traits of Dicranopteris dichotoma leaves to soil factors in different vegetation restoration years in red soil erosion area of Southern China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(3): 900-909] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201810272320
[46] 吴海勇,彭晚霞,宋同清,等. 桂西北喀斯特人为干扰区植被自然恢复与土壤养分变化[J]. 水土保持学报,2008, 22(4): 143-147. [WU Haiyong, PENG Wanxia, SONG Tongqing, et al. Changes of soil nutrients in process of natural vegetation restoration in karst disturbed area in northwest Guangxi [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(4): 143-147] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2008.04.031
[47] DU Youxin, PAN Genxing, LI Lianqing, et al. Leaf N/P ratio and nutrient reuse between dominant species and stands: Predicting phosphorus deficiencies in karst ecosystems, southwestern China [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, 64(2): 299-309. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-010-0847-1
[48] 龙文兴,臧润国,丁易. 海南岛霸王岭热带山地常绿林和热带山顶矮林群落特征[J]. 生物多样性,2011, 19(5): 558-566. [LONG Wenxing, ZANG Runguo, DING Yi. Community characteristics of tropical montane evergreen forest and tropical montane dwarf forest in Bawangling National Nature Reserve on Hainan Island, South China [J]. Biodiversity Science, 2011, 19(5): 558-566] DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.09309
[49] 林艳华,梁千慧,刘锦春. 喀斯特地区适生树种复羽叶栾树幼苗对干旱胁迫下异质生境的生长和光合响应[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2019, 41(8): 20-26. [LIN Yanhua, LIANG Qianhui, LIU Jinchun. Response of growth and photosynthesis of Koelreuteria Bipinnata, an adaptive tree species to karst regions, to the heterogeneous habitat under water stress [J]. Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 41(8): 20-26] DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2019.08.004
[50] 邓平,吴敏,赵英,等.干旱胁迫下外源钙对桂西北喀斯特地区青冈栎种子萌发的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020, 48(2): 69-79. [DENG Ping, WU Min, ZHAO Ying, et al. Effects of exogenous calcium on seed germination of Cyclobalanopsis Glauca in karst area of northwestern Guangxi under draught stress [J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(2): 69-79] DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2020.02.009
[51] 徐则民,黄润秋,唐正光,等.中国南方碳酸盐岩上覆红土形成机制研究进展[J]. 地球与环境,2005, 33(4): 33-40. [XU Zemin, HUANG Runqiu, TANG Zhengguang. et al. A review of advances and outstanding issues in research on the forming mechanism of laterite in south China [J]. Earth and Environment, 2005, 33(4): 33-40] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9250.2005.04.005
[52] YANG Jing, NIE Yunpeng, CHEN Hongsong, et al. Hydraulic properties of karst fractures filled with soils and regolith materials: Implication for their ecohydrological functions [J]. Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science, 2016, 276: 93-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.04.024
[53] 吴丽萍,陈洪松,付智勇,等.喀斯特岩溶裂隙对地下径流和氮素垂直渗漏的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017, 31(5): 64-71. [WU Liping, CHEN Hongsong, FU Zhiyong, et al. Effects of karst fissures on subsurface runoff and nitrogen vertical leaching [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(5): 64-71] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2017.05.011
[54] 刘枭宏,李铁,谌芸,等.香根草植物篱带宽对紫色土坡地产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019, 33(4): 93-101. [LIU Xiaohong, LI Tie, CHEN Yun, et al. Effects of Vetiveria Zizanioides L. hedgerow width on runoff and sediment yield on purple soil slope [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(4): 93-101] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.014
[55] BURYLO M, REY F, BOCHET E, et al. Plant functional traits and species ability for sediment retention during concentrated flow erosion [J]. Plant and Soil, 2012, 353(1-2): 135-144. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-1017-2
[56] VASQUEZ-MENDEN R, VENTURA-RAMOS E, OLESCHKO K, et al. Soil erosion and runoff in different vegetation patches from semiarid Central Mexico [J]. Catena, 2010, 80(3): 162-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2009.11.003
[57] 吴毅,刘文耀,沈有信,等.滇石林地质公园喀斯特山地天然林和人工林凋落物与死地被物的动态特征[J].山地学报,2007, 25(3): 317-325. [WU Yi, LIU Wenyao, SHEN Youxin, et al. Dynamics of litterfall and litter on forest floor of natural forest and plantations in Stone Forest World Geological Park [J]. Mountain Research, 2007, 25(3): 317-325] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2007.03.009
[58] 苏正安,张建辉. 耕作导致的土壤再分布对土壤水分入渗的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010, 24(3): 194-198. [SU Zheng'an, ZHANG Jianhui. Impacts of soil redistribution by tillage on soil water infiltration [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 24(3): 194-198] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2010.03.036
[59] 沈有信,江洁,陈胜国,等. 滇东喀斯特山地植被退化及其恢复对策[J]. 山地学报,2005, 23(4): 425-430. [SHEN Youxin, JIANG Jie, CHEN Shengguo, et al. Vegetation degradation and its restoration strategies of karst upland in south-eastern Yunnan [J]. Mountain Research, 2005, 23(4): 425-430] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2005.04.007
[60] 李胜平,王克林. 人为干扰对桂西北喀斯特山地植被多样性及土壤养分分布的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2016, 23(5): 20-27. [LI Shengping, WANG Kelin. Effect of human disturbance on soil nutrients and plant diversity of grassland in karst mountain [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(5): 20-27] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20160617.014

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2022-01-30; 改回日期(Accepted date):2022-08-19
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金(41871198)。 [National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871198)]
作者简介(Biography):税伟(1974-),男,四川射洪人,教授,博士,主要研究方向:地理学和生态学。[SHUI Wei(1974-), male, born in Shehong, Sichuan province, professor, Ph.D., research on geography and ecology] E-mail: shuiweiman@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-30