[1]程 佳,方世明*.大别山区乡村地域多功能时空演变及其耦合协调度[J].山地学报,2024,(4):496-506.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000840]
　CHENG Jia,FANG Shiming*.Spat-Temporal Evolution of Multi-Functionality of Rural Regionsin the Dabie Mountains Areas in China and Its Coupling Coordination Degree[J].Mountain Research,2024,(4):496-506.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000840]
点击复制

大别山区乡村地域多功能时空演变及其耦合协调度
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第4期
页码:
496-506
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2024-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spat-Temporal Evolution of Multi-Functionality of Rural Regionsin the Dabie Mountains Areas in China and Its Coupling Coordination Degree
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)4-496-11
作者:
程 佳; 方世明*
(中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院,武汉 430074)
Author(s):
CHENG Jia;  FANG Shiming*
(School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences(Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China)
关键词:
乡村地域系统;  乡村地域多功能;  时空演变;  耦合协调度;  大别山区
Keywords:
rural region system;  multi-functionality of rural region;  spat-temporal evolution;  coupling coordination degree;  the Dabie Mountains area
分类号:
F301.2
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000840
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
中国集中连片特殊困难地区的乡村转型受到广泛关注。探究其乡村地域多功能的作用关系和时空分异性,是实现乡村地域资源优化配置、解决乡村发展面临的困境、推动乡村可持续发展的基础。中国大别山区,作为历史上重要的革命老区,其经济落后与自然资源丰富的双重特性,构成了研究乡村地域多功能演变的典型案例。本研究以大别山区县域乡村地域作为研究区,构建乡村地域多功能评价指标体系,应用耦合协调度模型和空间自相关模型,定量分析了2005—2020年大别山区31个县域乡村地域多功能时空演变特征及其耦合协调性变化。结果表明:(1)大别山区乡村地域生态功能保持稳定,生产、生活功能逐步提升。乡村地域生产功能空间集聚特征趋于分散,整体空间分布特征为“四周高、中部低”; 生活功能由开始的分散式空间格局,经过发展形成较为均衡的乡村生活功能分布格局; 生态功能空间集聚特征逐渐增强,整体表现出“中部高、四周低”的分布格局,呈现出“依山傍水、带状串联”的分布特征。(2)研究期间,大别山区乡村地域多功能耦合协调度稳步提高且整体处于中度协调阶段。中部山区可依托生态资源优势,补齐生产和生活功能短板; 而生产和生活功能较为突出的县,则应继续维护其功能的高质量发展,同时保障生态功能的可持续性。本研究结果可以为大别山区以及其他类似地区乡村多功能的空间优化配置和发展方向的确定提供科学依据,为促进乡村地区的顺利转型和城乡融合协调发展提供参考,有助于从根本上解决经济发展后劲不足的问题。
Abstract:
Rural transformation in China's Contiguous Poverty-Stricken Areas has received widespread attention. To explore the multifunctional role and spat-temporal differentiation of rural areas of China is the basis for realizing the optimal allocation of regional resources, solving the dilemma faced by rural development and promoting the sustainable development of rural areas. China's Dabie Mountains area, a historically important old revolutionary area, with its dual characteristics of economic backwardness and rich natural resources, constitutes a typical case for studying the multifunctional evolution of rural territories.
In this study, the rural regions in 31 counties of the Dabie Mountains areas were selected as the research object, and the multifunctional evaluation index system of rural territories was constructed. It applied the coupling coordination degree model and spatial autocorrelation model to quantitatively analyze the spatio-temporal evolution of multi-functionality of rural regions in the counties of the Dabie Mountains areas in the period of 2005-2020, as well as their changes in coupling coordination degree.
(1)The ecological function of rural regions in the Dabie Mountains area remained stable, with production and living functions gradually improving. The spatial agglomeration of production function in the rural regions tended to be decentralized, and the overall spatial distribution was characterized by high around and low in the middle. From a decentralized spatial pattern in the beginning, the living functions had developed into a more balanced distribution pattern of rural living functions. The spatial agglomeration of ecology function was gradually enhanced, and the overall distribution pattern was characterized by high in the middle and low in the periphery, showing a distribution landscape surrounded by mountains and rivers, and connected in series in strips.
(2)For the study period, the multi-functional coupling coordination degree of the rural regions in the Dabie Mountains area increased steadily and was in the moderate coordination stage. The central mountainous areas can rely on the advantages of ecological resources to make up for the shortcomings of production and living functions. Districts and counties with prominent production and living functions should continue to maintain high-quality development of their functions while ensuring the sustainability of ecological functions.
This study provides a scientific basis for optimal allocation of rural multi-functional space and determination of development direction in the Dabie Mountains and other similar areas, and it provides a reference for promoting the smooth transformation of rural areas and the coordinated development of urban-rural integration, and helps to solve the problem of insufficient stamina of economic development from the root.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘彦随, 周扬, 李玉恒. 中国乡村地域系统与乡村振兴战略[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528. [LIU Yansui, ZHOU Yang, LI Yuheng. Rural regional system and rural revitalization strategy in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2511-2528] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201912007
[2] 刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389. [LIU Yansui, LIU Yu, CHEN Yufu. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389] DOI:10.11821/xb201110008
[3] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. [LIU Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[4] LI Yuheng, WESTLUND H, LIU Yansui. Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, 68: 135-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003
[5] 李亚静, 孔雪松, 何建华, 等. 湖北省乡村地域功能评价与转向特征分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(3): 79-87. [LI Yajing, KONG Xuesong, HE Jianhua, et al. Regional function evaluation and transformation characteristics of rural areas in Hubei Province [J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(3): 79-87] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20210301.110146
[6] 贺艳华, 范曙光, 周国华, 等. 基于主体功能区划的湖南省乡村转型发展评价[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 667-676. [HE Yanhua, FAN Shuguang, ZHOU Guohua, et al. Evaluation of rural transformation development in Hunan Province based on major function oriented zoning [J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 667-676] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.010
[7] 李繁荣. 中国乡村振兴与乡村功能优化转型[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(12): 2158-2167. [LI Fanrong. Rural revitalization and rural functional optimization and transformation in China [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(12): 2158-2167] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.12.009
[8] 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 563-576. [LONG Hualou, TU Shuangshuang. Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 563-576] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201704001
[9] WILLEMEN L, HEIN L, VAN MENSVOORT M E F, et al. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10(1): 62-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.015
[10] 杨忍, 罗秀丽, 陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328. [YANG Ren, LUO Xiuli, CHEN Yanchun. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of rural multifunctionality at county level in China [J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.005
[11] 屠爽爽, 龙花楼, 张英男, 等. 典型村域乡村重构的过程及其驱动因素[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 323-339. [TU Shuangshuang, LONG Hualou, ZHANG Yingnan, et al. Process and driving factors of rural restructuring in typical villages [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(2): 323-339] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201902009
[12] 徐凯, 房艳刚. 乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别——以辽宁省78个区县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 482-495. [XU Kai, FANG Yangang. Spatial differentiation and type identification of rural territorial multi-functions in Liaoning Province [J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 482-495] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020170647
[13] 朱跃, 杨兴柱, 杨周, 等. 主体功能视角下皖南旅游区乡村多功能演化特征与影响机制[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(5): 815-823. [ZHU Yue, YANG Xingzhu, YANG Zhou, et al. Evolution characteristics and mechanism of rural multifunctionality in South Anhui tourism area based on major function-oriented zones [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(5): 815-823] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.05.009
[14] 马晓冬, 李鑫, 胡睿, 等. 基于乡村多功能评价的城市边缘区“三生”空间划分研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1382-1392. [MA Xiaodong, LI Xin, HU Rui, et al. Delineation of “production-living-ecological” space for urban fringe based on rural multifunction evaluation [J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1382-1392] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.011
[15] 周侗, 王佳琳. 中原城市群乡村“三生”功能分区识别及调控路径[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(7): 1227-1238. [ZHOU Tong, WANG Jialin. Classifying and regulation pathway of rural “production-living-ecology” regional area in the Center Plains Urban Agglomeration [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2023, 43(7): 1227-1238] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2023.07.010
[16] 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨——超越“现代化”发展范式[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270. [FANG Yangang, LIU Jisheng. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257-270] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201502007
[17] 王成, 唐宁. 重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114. [WANG Cheng, TANG Ning. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of rural production-living-ecological space function coupling coordination in Chongqing Municipality [J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201806004
[18] 刘玉, 刘彦随, 郭丽英. 乡村地域多功能的内涵及其政策启示[J]. 人文地理, 2011, 26(6): 103-106+132. [LIU Yu, LIU Yansui, GUO Liying. Connotations of rural regional multifunction and its policy implications in China [J]. Human Geography, 2011, 26(6): 103-106+132] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.06.029
[19] 安徽省统计局. 安徽统计年鉴(2005—2020)[M/OL]. 北京: 中国统计出版社[2024- 04- 01]. http://tjj.ah.gov.cn/oldfiles/tjj/tjjweb/njlm/njbooks.htm [Anhui Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Anhui Statistical Yearbook(2005-2020)[M/OL]. Beijing: China Statistics Press [2024- 04- 01]. http://tjj.ah.gov.cn/oldfiles/tjj/tjjweb/njlm/njbooks.htm]
[20] 湖北省统计局. 湖北统计年鉴(2005—2020)[M/OL]. 北京: 中国统计出版社[2024- 04- 01]. https://tjj.hubei.gov.cn/tjsj/sjkscx/tjnj/qstjnj/ [Hubei Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Hubei Statistical Yearbook(2005-2020)[M/OL]. Beijing: China Statistics Press [2024-04-01]. https://tjj.hubei.gov.cn/tjsj/sjkscx/tjnj/qstjnj/]
[21] 河南省统计局. 河南统计年鉴(2005—2020)[M/OL]. 北京: 中国统计出版社[2024- 04- 01]. https://tjj.henan.gov.cn/tjfw/tjcbw/tjnj/ [Henan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Henan Statistical Yearbook(2005-2020)[M/OL]. Beijing: China Statistics Press [2024- 04- 01]. https://tjj.henan.gov.cn/tjfw/tjcbw/tjnj/]
[22] 倪维秋, 夏源, 赵宁宁. 乡村地域“三生空间”功能演化与耦合协调度研究——以黑龙江省为例[J].中国土地科学, 2022, 36(9): 111-119. [NI Weiqiu, XIA Yuan, ZHAO Ningning. Functional evolution and coupling coordination measurement of production-living-ecological space in rural areas: Taking Heilongjiang Province as an example [J]. China Land Science, 2022, 36(9): 111-119] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20220901.094605
[23] 徐凯, 房艳刚. 辽宁省乡村多功能评价和演变特征分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(1): 147-157. [XU Kai, FANG Yangang. Rural multi-function evaluation and evolution characteristics in Liaoning Province [J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(1): 147-157] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.01.017
[24] 尹婧博, 李红, 王冬艳, 等. 吉林省乡村地域多功能时空变化与耦合协调测度研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(9): 63-73. [YIN Jingbo, LI Hong, WANG Dongyan, et al. Spatial-temporal change and coupling coordination measurement of rural territorial multi-functions in Jilin Province [J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(9): 63-73] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20210823.154850
[25] 罗雅丽, 李同昇, 张常新, 等. 乡镇地域多功能性评价与主导功能定位——以金湖县为例[J]. 人文地理, 2016, 31(3): 94-101. [LUO Yali, LI Tongsheng, ZHANG Changxin, et al. Town territorial multi-functionality evaluation and the dominant function orientation: A case of Jinhu County [J]. Human Geography, 2016, 31(3): 94-101] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.03.014
[26] 谭雪兰, 安悦, 蒋凌霄, 等. 长株潭地区乡村多功能类型分异特征及形成机制[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(10): 80-88. [TAN Xuelan, AN Yue, JIANG Lingxiao, et al. Spatial differentiation and formal mechanism of rural function types in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Area [J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(10): 80-88] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.10.011
[27] 王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等. 国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 793-810. [WANG Shujia, KONG Wei, REN Liang, et al. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(3): 793-810] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210319
[28] 姜磊, 柏玲, 吴玉鸣. 中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析——兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 788-799. [JIANG Lei, BAI Ling, WU Yuming. Coupling and coordinating degrees of provincial economy, resources and environment in China [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(5): 788-799] DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160512
[29] 侯蕊, 李红波. 武汉市土地利用多功能时空变化及耦合协调特征分析——基于“两型社会”试验区建设前后的对比[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(1): 69-78. [HOU Rui, LI Hongbo. Spatial-temporal change and coupling coordination characteristics of land use functions in Wuhan City: Based on the comparison before and after the “resource-economical and environment-friendly society” experimental zone establishment [J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(1): 69-78] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20201230.094515

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2024- 04- 01; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2024- 08-14
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家自然科学基金(41971245)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971245)]
作者简介(Biography): 程佳(1996-),男,安徽安庆人,博士研究生,主要研究方向:乡村地理。[CHENG Jia(1996-), male, born in Anqing, Anhui province, Ph.D. candidate, research on rural geography] E-mail: chengjia0122@cug.edu.cn
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 方世明(1977-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向:乡村振兴与人文地理。[FANG Shiming(1977-), male, Ph.D., professor, research on rural revitalization and humanity geography] E-mail: fangsm@cug.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-30