[1]廖拉拉,唐丽霞*,吴文丽,等.喀斯特地区棕榈根-土复合体抗剪特性[J].山地学报,2024,(6):827-837.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000865]
 LIAO Lala,TANG Lixia*,WU Wenli,et al.Shear Resistance Properties of Root-Soil Composite of Trachycarpus Fortunei in Karst Area[J].Mountain Research,2024,(6):827-837.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000865]
点击复制

喀斯特地区棕榈根-土复合体抗剪特性
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第6期
页码:
827-837
栏目:
山地灾害
出版日期:
2024-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Shear Resistance Properties of Root-Soil Composite of Trachycarpus Fortunei in Karst Area
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)6-827-11
作者:
廖拉拉唐丽霞*吴文丽阮仕航王子杰
(贵州大学 林学院,贵阳 550025)
Author(s):
LIAO Lala TANG Lixia* WU Wenli RUAN Shihang WANG Zijie
(College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)
关键词:
根-土复合体 根系形态 抗剪强度 粘聚力 棕榈
Keywords:
root-soil complex root morphology shear strength cohesion Trachycarpus fortunei
分类号:
S718.3
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000865
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
棕榈树根系发达,生命力顽强,是中国西南喀斯特地区生态恢复的优势树种。关于棕榈根系固土的力学特性尚不明确。本文以棕榈根系为研究对象,将根系分为2~3 mm、3~4 mm、4~5 mm三个径级,采用TZY-1型土工合成材料综合测定仪在4种垂直荷载下对棕榈根-土复合体进行直剪试验,探讨不同含根量(2根、4根、9根、16根)和布根角度(0°、30°、60°、90°)下根-土复合体的抗剪特性。研究结果表明:(1)相比素土,根-土复合体的抗剪强度增加,增幅为0.4%~26%,且抗剪强度整体随着含根量和布根角度的增加而增大。当含根量从9根增加到16根时,增幅减小。当根系与剪切面的夹角趋于90°时,根-土复合体抗剪强度最大。(2)抗剪强度比F值随含根量和布根角度的增大分别增加23%和13.1%,且低荷载下的根系有更好的抵抗剪切破坏能力。(3)不同根系含量和分布角度分别使根-土复合体粘聚力增加0.64~2.79 kPa和0.23~1.99 kPa,同比素土提高了2.6%~34%。根系加筋主要是通过提高附加粘聚力进而增强根-土复合体的抗剪强度,对内摩擦角的影响并不显著。本研究成果可为棕榈根系固土效果提供有力的理论技术支撑,为西南喀斯特地区生态恢复提供理论依据。
Abstract:
Trachycarpus fortunei has a well-developed root system with resilient vitality, making it an advantageous species for ecological restoration in karst areas. Unfortunately, the mechanical properties of soil reinforcement by its root are not yet clear.
In this study, the shear resistance of the root-soil composite of Trachycarpus fortunei with varied root morphology in the karst regions of southwestern China was investigated.It sorted the roots into three diameter classes: 2-3 mm, 3-4 mm, and 4-5 mm. Direct shear tests were conducted on the root-soil composites under four levels of vertical loads using a TZY-1 Type geosynthetic materials comprehensive tester to figure out the shear properties of the root-soil composite under different root contents(2 taproot, 4 taproot, 9 taproot, 16 taproot)and root stretching angles(0°, 30°, 60°, 90°).
(1)Compared with plain soil, the shear strength of the root-soil complex of Trachycarpus fortunei increased by 0.4% to 26%. The overall shear strength increased with the increase in taproot quantity and root stretching angle; however, taproot quantity increased from 9 to 16 roots, the rate of increase decreased. The shear strength of the root-soil composites reached the maximum when the angle between the root stretching and the shear plane approached 90°.
(2)The shear strength ratio(F value)increased by 23% and 13% with the increase in root quantity and root stretching angle, respectively, and the root-soil complex had better resistance to shear failure under low load.
(3)Different taproot quantities and stretching angles increased the cohesion of root-soil composites by 0.64 kPa to 2.79 kPa and 0.23 kPa to 1.99 kPa, respectively, representing an increase of 2.6% to 34% as compared with plain soil. Root reinforcement primarily enhanced the shear strength of the root-soil composites by increasing additional cohesion, with a non-significant impact on internal friction angle.
Generally, the stabilization of root-soil composite depends on the morphological features of a root system. To enhance the strength of root-soil composite and improve soil erosion resistance, a proper formation of a root system in soil should be carefully examined when selecting tree species for planting. This research would provide theoretical and technical support for soil reinforcement evaluation of Trachycarpus fortunei and associated ecological restoration efforts in the karst regions of southwest China.

参考文献/References:

[1] 徐华, 袁海莉, 王歆宇, 等. 根系形态和层次结构对根土复合体力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(5): 926-935. [XU Hua, YUAN Haili, WANG Xinyu, et al. Influences of morphology and hierarchy of roots on mechanical characteristics of root-soil composites [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(5): 926-935] DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202205016
[2] DOCKER B B, HUBBLE T C T. Quantifying root-reinforcement of river bank soils by four Australian tree species [J]. Geomorphology, 2008, 100(3-4): 401-418. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.01.009
[3] NG C W W, WOON K X, LEUNG A K, et al. Experimental investigation of induced suction distribution in a grass-covered soil [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 52: 219-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.013
[4] 周成, 路永珍, 黄月华. 香根草加固不同含水率膨胀土的侧限膨胀和直剪试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(S2): 30-35. [ZHOU Cheng, LU Yongzhen, HUANG Yuehua. Oedometer expansion and direct shear tests on vetiver root-reinforced expansive soil with different water contents [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(S2): 30-35] DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S2005
[5] GONZALEZ-OLLAURI A, MICKOVSKI S B. Plant-soil reinforcement response under different soil hydrological regimes [J]. Geoderma, 2017, 285: 141-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.002
[6] KIM J H, FOURCAUD T, JOURDAN C, et al. Vegetation as a driver of temporal variations in slope stability: The impact of hydrological processes [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44: 4897-4907. DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073174
[7] 刘亚斌, 胡夏嵩, 余冬梅, 等. 西宁盆地黄土区 2 种灌木植物根–土界面微观结构特征及摩擦特性试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 37(5): 1270-1280. [LIU Yabin, HU Xiasong, YU Dongmei, et al. Microstructural features and friction characteristics of the interface of shrub roots and soil in loess area of Xining basin [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 37(5): 1270-1280] DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1314
[8] BISCHETTI G B, CHIARADIA E A, SIMONATO T, et al. Root strength and root area ratio of forest species in Lombardy(Northern Italy)[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005, 278(1-2): 11-22. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-0605-4
[9] MAO Zhun, YANG Ming, BOURRIER F, et al. Evaluation of root reinforcement models using numerical modeling approaches [J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 381(1-2): 249-270. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-014-2116-7
[10] KATUWAL S, VERMANG J, COMELIS W M, et al. Effect of root density on erosion and erodibility of a loamy soil under simulated rain [J]. Soil Science, 2013, 178(1): 29-36. DOI: 10.1097/SS.0b013e318285b052
[11] FU Jiangtao, HU Xiasong, BRIERLEY G, et al. The influence of plant root system architectural properties upon the stability of loess hillslopes, northeast Qinghai, China [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13(5): 785-801. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-014-3275-y
[12] HU Xiasong, BRIERLEY G, ZHU Haili, et al. An exploratory analysis of vegetation strategies to reduce shallow landslide activity on loess hillslopes, northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2013, 10(4): 668-686. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2584-x
[13] ISLAM M S, BADHAN F F. Sandy slope stabilization using vegetation [G]// Japan Institute of Disaster Prevention & Urban Safety(BUET-JIDPUS), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings of International Conference on Disaster Risk Mitigation, September 23-24, 2017. Dhaka: BUET-JIDPUS, 2017: 1-4.
[14] 付江涛, 余冬梅, 李晓康, 等. 柴达木盆地盐湖区盐生植物根-土复合体物理力学性质指标概率统计分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程报, 2020, 39(8): 1696-1709. [FU Jiangtao, YU Dongmei, LI Xiaokang, et al. Statistical probability analysis of the physical index of rooted soil in Qiadam basin [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(8): 1696-1709] DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2019.1083
[15] 陈终达, 肖宏彬, 张春晓, 等. 根系分布方式对根-土复合体抗剪强度的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(8): 130-135. [CHEN Zhongda, XIAO Hongbin, ZHANG Chunxiao, et al. The impact of root distribution methods on the shear strength of root-soil composite [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2016, 36(8): 130-135] DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2016.08.023
[16] 孔纲强, 文磊, 刘汉龙, 等. 植物根系分布形态及含根复合土强度特性试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3717-3723. [KONG Gangqiang, WEN Lei, LIU Hanlong, et al. Strength properties of root compound soil and morphological observation of plant root [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3717-3723] DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1338
[17] AHMED S, LIU Huimin, AHMAD A, et al. Characterization of anti-bacterial compounds from the seed coat of Chinese windmill palm tree(Trachycarpus fortunei)[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017, 8: 1894. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01894
[18] LIU Yingying, WEI Xiaoli, ZHOU Zijing, et al. Influence of heterogeneous karst microhabitats on the root foraging ability of Chinese windmill palm(Trachycarpus fortunei)seedlings [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(2): 434. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020434
[19] 廖拉拉, 潘露, 唐丽霞, 等.双荚决明不同弯曲程度单根抗拉变形特性[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2024, 22(2): 65-72. [LIAO Lala, PAN Lu, TANG Lixia, et al. Tensile deformation characteristics of single root with different curvature of Cassia bicapsularis [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 22(2): 65-72] DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2023060
[20] 徐永服, 高华端, 白云星, 等. 黔中喀斯特区不同岩性发育坡耕地土力学性质差异研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(5): 1080-1084. [XU Yongfu, GAO Huaduan, BAI Yunxing, et al. Soil mechanical properties of slope cropland with different lithology development in karst area, central Guizhou Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 49(5): 1080-1084] DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2018.05.11
[21] 郭欢, 陈龙, 唐丽霞, 等. 喀斯特区2种护坡灌木单根拉拔摩擦试验[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2022, 20(1): 128-135. [GUO Huan, CHEN Long, TANG Lixia, et al. Experimental study on the pull-out friction of two kinds of slope protection shrubs in karst area [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 20(1): 128-135] DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2022.01.017
[22] LAL D, SANKAR N, CHANDRAKARAN S. Effect of reinforcement form on the behaviour of coir geotextile-reinforced sand through laboratory triaxial compression tests [J]. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 12(3-4): 309-315. DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2016.1275428
[23] POLLEN N, SIMON A. Estimating the mechanical effects of riparian vegetation on stream bank stability using a fiber bundle model [J]. Water Resources Research, 2005, 41(7): 226-244. DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003801
[24] WALDRON L J. The shear resistance of root-permeated homogeneous and stratified soil [J]. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America, 1977, 41(5): 843-849.
[25] 丰田, 李光范, 胡伟, 等. 乔木根土复合体的抗剪强度实验研究[J]. 应用力学学报, 2018, 35(3): 517-523. [FENG Tian, LI Guangfan, HU Wei, et al. Experimental study on the influence of arborwood root on the shear strength of root-soil composite [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2018, 35(3): 517-523] DOI: 10.11776/cjam.35.03.B017
[26] 李广信, 张丙印, 于玉贞. 土力学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2022: 176-179. [LI Guangxin, ZHANG Bingyin, YU Yuzhen. Soil mechanics [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2022: 176-179]
[27] 丰田, 邱宙廷, 李光范, 等. 植被护坡中根土复合土体抗剪强度分析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2018, 49(7): 174-180. [FENG Tian, QIU Zhouting, LI Guangfan, et al. Analysis on shearing strength of root-soil composite in vegetation revetment [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2018, 49(7): 174-180] DOI: 10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2018.07.023

相似文献/References:

[1]李光莹,虎啸天,李希来,等.黄河源玛沁地区高寒草地植物固土护坡的力学效应[J].山地学报,2014,(05):550.
 LI Guangying,HU Xiaotian,LI Xilai,et al.Mechanical Effects of Alpine Grassland Plants in Slope Protection in Maqin County of the Source Area of the Yellow River[J].Mountain Research,2014,(6):550.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2023-12- 07; 改回日期(Accepted date):2024-12- 07
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家自然科学基金(31960332); 贵州省重大专项子项目(黔科合重大专项(2014)6024-2); 贵州省基础研究(自然科学)计划项目(QKHJC-ZK[2023]YB65)。[National Nature Science Foundation of China(31960332); Sub-Project of Guizhou Provincial Major Special Project(Qiankehe Major Special Project(2014)6024-2); Guizhou Provincial Basic Research(Natural Science)Program Project(QKHJC-ZK[2023]YB65)]
作者简介(Biography): 廖拉拉(1998-),女,贵州铜仁人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:水土保持。[LIAO Lala(1998-), female, born in Tongren,Guizhou Province, M.Sc. candidate, research on soil and water conservation] E-mail: gs.llliao21@gzu.edu.cn
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 唐丽霞(1976-),女,博士,副教授,主要研究方向:水土保持。[TANG Lixia(1976-), female, Ph.D., associate professor, research on soil and water conservation] E-mail:lxtang@gzu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-11-30