[1]徐 辉,刘 鑫,刘天琪,等.丘陵谷地传统聚落空间形态及其环境适应性解析——以重庆黔江凤台村为例[J].山地学报,2024,(1):94-107.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000807]
　XU Hui,LIU Xin,LIU Tianqi,et al.Spatial Configuration and Environmental Adaptability of Traditional Settlement in Hilly Valley: Taking Fengtai Village in Qianjiang, Chongqing, China as an Example[J].Mountain Research,2024,(1):94-107.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000807]
点击复制

丘陵谷地传统聚落空间形态及其环境适应性解析——以重庆黔江凤台村为例
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第1期
页码:
94-107
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2024-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial Configuration and Environmental Adaptability of Traditional Settlement in Hilly Valley: Taking Fengtai Village in Qianjiang, Chongqing, China as an Example
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)1-094-14
作者:
徐 辉1; 刘 鑫1; 刘天琪2; 刘 华1
(1.重庆交通大学 建筑与城市规划学院,重庆400074; 2.重庆大学 建筑城规学院,重庆400044)
Author(s):
XU Hui1; LIU Xin2; LIU Tianqi3; LIU Hua1
(1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China; 2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)
关键词:
丘陵谷地;  空间句法;  空间形态;  环境适应性;  重庆;  凤台村
Keywords:
hilly valley;  spatial syntax;  spatial morphology;  environmental adaptability;  Chongqing;  Fengtai village
分类号:
K901
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000807
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
巴渝地区多样性与异质性地理环境孕育了极具特色的传统聚落空间。传统聚落研究大多探究其空间形态、形制格局、类型特征及演进规律,而针对多文化汇集区——武陵山片区传统聚落空间形态及其环境适应性的综合解析框架的整体性不足,没有考虑与社会环境多因子要素相结合。本文以丘陵山谷地区的重庆黔江土家族聚落凤台村为研究对象,采用空间句法作为分析工具,通过对整合度与聚落结构、选择度与聚落节点、理解度与聚落界面的模拟分析,探讨以环境适应性为核心的耦合互动机制,并进一步结合地理环境、生计环境和文化环境等多因子影响因素,具体阐释这种互动机制的诱因、制约、协同与调适过程。研究发现:(1)凤台村聚落空间呈带状分布,空间组织受主轴线与等高线双重限制,空间布局呈现中部聚集,边缘分散的形态,并最终形成顺应地形、平行轴线、均匀分布的聚落肌理,具有相似特征的聚落形态在渝东南、鄂西南、湘西北等中国南方山地区域广泛分布。(2)凤台村聚落沿山谷等高线布局,呈现出“长街短巷”空间特征,是基于民间生活习俗自下而上形成的聚落主体结构,该街巷结构空间承载了集约生产、公共生活、邻里交流等多重功能,体现了丘陵谷地区域乡土社会的特色结构。(3)凤台村聚落的公共空间分为生产性、生活性和文化性三类。其中生活性空间连接性较高,与当代农业生计的延续相关; 文化性空间的选择度有限,与公共空间环境配套不足下的行为感知度弱化有关。(4)凤台村聚落界面是人地关系下自然与人工机制的相互作用结果,反映了聚落共同体基于生计方式、民俗文化和自然地理的互动机制; 形成了明确的生活区、生产区和公共文化区,展现了乡土社会多民族交融的文化习俗。本研究可为传统聚落遗产保护修复、文化旅游开发以及乡村全面振兴建设提供理论支撑,为丘陵谷地传统聚落的可持续发展提供实践指导。
Abstract:
The diverse and heterogeneous geographic environment of the Bayu region, southeast China has cultivated highly distinctive traditional settlement configuration.
Traditional settlements were addressed in previous studies for their spatial structures, layouts, features, types and evolution laws, but for the ethnic settlements in the Wuling Mountain Region, where it is a complex of multicultural residence, there was little effort to make for a comprehensive interpretation of its spatial pattern and environmental adaptability, even without inclusion of multi-factor elements of social environment in research framework.
In this paper, Fengtai village, a Tujia settlement at a hilly valley site in Qianjiang county, Chongqing municipality, China, was taken for a case study of traditional settlement research. By spatial syntax method, it conducted modelling of traditional settlement regarding the Integration and settlement structure, the Choice and settlement nodes, and the Intelligibility and settlement interface, which contributed to a full understanding of the interaction mechanism between natural element and artificial element of traditional settlement for environmental adaptability. Then process of triggering, constraining, synergizing and adapting this interaction was further specified in relation to the multifactorial influences of the geographic, livelihood and cultural environments.
(1)The settlement structure at Fengtai village was a zonal pattern, spatially organized by restriction of both main axis and contour line; thus the spatial layout was clustered in the middle and scattered at the edges, forming a settlement texture conforming to local terrain, parallel axis and uniform distribution. Ethic settlements with the similar features were widely distributed in the mountainous areas of south China, such as southeast Chongqing, southwest Hubei and northwest Hunan.
(2)Fengtai village situated along valley contour, exhibited a shape of long streets but short alleys, which exemplified a popular structure of settlements created on local habits and customs. This type of settlement structure was loaded with multiple functions such as intensive production, public life and neighborhood communication, reflecting the characteristic of the rural society in hilly valley regions.
(3)The public space of Fengtai village could be divided into three categories of attributes, i.e., production, life and culture, among which the connectivity of living space was high, being related with the continuation of contemporary agricultural livelihood. The limited selectivity of cultural space was related with the weakening of behavior perception under insufficiency of public space environment supporting.
(4)The settlement interface of Fengtai village was the result of interaction between natural element and artificial element under human-land relationship, embodying a kind of internal mechanism of settlement community based on livelihood, folk culture and natural geography; therefore, a distinct living area, production area and public cultural area were delineated, reflecting a cultural custom with multi-ethnic integration in local society.
This research can provide theoretical support for heritage protection and restoration of traditional settlements, cultural tourism development and comprehensive rural revitalization construction, and offer practical guidance for sustainable development of traditional settlements in hilly valleys.

参考文献/References:

[1] 朱莹, 屈芳竹, 刘松茯. 东北边域鄂伦春族传统聚落空间结构研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2020, 22(S2): 23-30.[ZHU Ying, QU Fangzhu, LIU Songfu. Research on the space structure of Oroqen people traditional settlement in northeast border region[J]. Architectural Journal, 2020, 22(S2): 23-30]
[2] 周政旭, 封基铖. 生存压力下的贵州少数民族山地聚落营建——以扁担山地区为例[J]. 城市规划, 2015, 39(9): 74-81.[ZHOU Zhengxu, FENG Jicheng. Construction of ethnic minority settlement in mountainous area in Guizhou under survival pressure: A case study of Biandan mountain area[J]. City Planning Review, 2015, 39(9): 74-81] DOI: 10.11819/cpr20150913a
[3] 严巍, 王思静, 折建荣, 等. 闽东海防传统聚落营建的防御性智慧解析——以福鼎石兰村为例[J]. 建筑学报, 2022, 26(S2): 189-194.[YAN Wei, WANG Sijing, SHE Jianrong, et al. Analysis of defensive wisdom in the construction of coastal defense traditional settlements in eastern Fujian: Taking Fuding Shilan village as an example[J]. Architectural Journal, 2022, 26(S2): 189-194]
[4] 杨忍. 基于自然主控因子和道路可达性的广东省乡村聚落空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(10): 1859-1871.[YANG Ren. An analysis of rural settlement patterns and their effect mechanisms based on road traffic accessibility of Guangdong[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(10): 1859-1871] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201710010
[5] 徐辉. 中国西南风土建筑文化技术研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2020: 409-449.[XU Hui. Research on the cultural-technic of vernacular architecture in southwest China[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2020: 409-449] DOI: 10.27670/d.cnki.gcqdu.2020.000437
[6] 张菁, 龙彬, 陈秋渝. 地理民族双重影响下的渝东南传统聚落景观特征研究[J]. 中国园林, 2023, 39(1): 85-91.[ZHANG Jing, LONG Bin, CHEN Qiuyu. Research on the landscape characteristics of southeast Chongqing traditional settlement under the influence of geography and ethnicity[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2023, 39(1): 85-91] DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2023.01.0085
[7] 李晓颖, 黄欢, 王世超. 乡土文化景观风貌提升构建中景观基因的识别与运用研究[J]. 中国园林, 2022, 38(6): 29-34.[LI Xiaoying, HUANG Huan, WANG Shichao. Study on the identification and application of landscape gene in the promotion and construction of local cultural landscape[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2022, 38(6): 29-34] DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2022.06.0029
[8] HILLIER B, HANSON J. The social logic of space[M]. Britain: Cambridge University Press, 1984: 12-13.
[9] 单军, 黄华青. 环境适应性视野下卡帕多奇亚地区穴居聚落研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2015, 563(8): 115-118.[SHAN Jun, HUANG Huaqing. A study on cave settlements of Cappadocia in light of environmental adaptation[J]. Architectural Journal, 2015, 563(8): 115-118]
[10] 陶伟, 陈红叶, 林杰勇. 句法视角下广州传统村落空间形态及认知研究[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(2): 209-218.[TAO Wei, CHEN Hongye, LIN Jieyong. Spatial form and spatial cognition of traditional village in syntactical view: A case study of Xiaozhou village, Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(2): 209-218]
[11] 孙霞, 李早, 高敏, 等. 传统村落空间特征与商业服务设施耦合分析——以世界文化遗产村落安徽宏村为例[J]. 建筑学报, 2017, 16(S1): 118-122.[SUN Xia, LI Zao, GAO Min, et al. Coupling analysis of traditional villages' space characteristics and study on commercial service facilities: Take the world cultural heritage Anhui Hongcun for example[J]. Architectural Journal, 2017, 16(S1): 118-122]
[12] 唐宝义宁, 赵翠薇. 山地屯堡传统村落空间形态演变及其影响因素——以蔡官村与小呈堡村为例[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2023, 46(1): 126-135.[TANG Baoyining, ZHAO Cuiwei. Mountain Tunpu traditional settlement morphological evolution and the influencing factors: A case study of Caiguan village and Xiaochengbao village[J]. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 2023, 46(1): 126-135] DOI: 10.7612/j.issn.2096-5281.2023.01.014
[13] 戴晓玲, 浦欣成, 董奇. 以空间句法方法探寻传统村落的深层空间结构[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(8): 52-57.[DAI Xiaoling, PU Xincheng, DONG Qi. Explore the deep spatial structure of traditional villages by space syntax approach[J]. Chinese Gardens, 2020, 36(8): 52-57] DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2020.08.0052
[14] 李婧, 杨定海, 肖大威. 海南岛传统聚落文化分区及区际过渡关系研究——从海南岛传统民居平面形制及聚落形态类型谈起[J]. 建筑学报, 2020, 22(S2): 8-15.[LI Jing, YANG Dinghai, XIAO Dawei. Study on the cultural divisions and interregional transition relations of the traditional settlement in Hainan Island: Starting from the layout of vernacular dwelling and settlement morphology in Hainan Island[J]. Architectural Journal, 2020, 22(S2): 8-15]
[15] 肖罗, 魏春雨. 基于CSSCI的中国乡村聚落形态研究知识图谱分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(4): 148-157.[XIAO Luo, WEI Chunyu. Knowledge map on the study of Chinese rural settlement form based on CSSCI[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(4): 148-157] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.04.018
[16] 陈驰, 李伯华, 袁佳利, 等. 基于空间句法的传统村落空间形态认知——以杭州市芹川村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(10): 234-240.[CHEN Chi, LI Bohua, YUAN Jiali, et al. Spatial morphology cognition of traditional village based on space syntax: A case study of Qinchuan village of Hangzhou[J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(10): 234-240] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.04.018
[17] 寇相玮, 李伟芳, 姜文达, 等. 宁波四明山区农村聚落空间格局及影响因素[J]. 山地学报, 2018, 36(5): 784-791.[KOU Xiangwei, LI Weifang, JIANG Wenda, et al. Spatial pattern and influence factors of rural settlements: A case of Siming mountain area in Ningbo city[J]. Mountain Research, 2018, 36(5): 784-791] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000374
[18] 张忠训, 杨庆媛, 王立, 等. 基于空间句法的山区旅游型小城镇多尺度空间演变——以镇远古镇为例[J]. 山地学报, 2019, 37(4): 551-563.[ZHANG Zhongxun, YANG Qingyuan, WANG Li, et al. Exploring the multi-scale spatial evolution of tourist towns in mountainous areas by spatial syntax method: A case study of Zhenyuan ancient town,China[J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(4): 551-563] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000447
[19] 高英杰, 吴帛阳, 杨定海, 等. 海口市美社村聚落空间格局时空演变特征[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2022, 41(2): 138-143.[GAO Yingjie, WU Boyang, YANG Dinghai, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of settlement spatial pattern in Meishe village of Haikou city[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2022, 41(2): 138-143] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2022.02.023
[20] 石谦飞, 李昉芳, 景一帆, 等. 晋东南传统聚落水环境适应性营造智慧——以晋城市泽州县南峪村为例[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2021, 36(6): 134-140.[SHI Qianfei, LI Fangfang, JING Yifan, et al. Water environment adapted building wisdom of the traditional villages in the southeast of Shanxi province: Take Nanyu village in Zezhou county as an example[J], Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 2021, 36(6): 134-140] DOI: 10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20210617
[21] 李建华, 夏莉莉. 文化生态层级理论下的西南聚落形态——以大理喜洲聚落为例[J]. 建筑学报, 2010(S1): 55-57.[LI Jianhua, XIA Lili. The southwest settlement pattern under the cultural and ecological hierarchy theory: A case study on Xizhou settlement in Dali[J]. Architecture Journal, 2010(S1): 55-57]
[22] 徐钰彬. 传统聚落的场景:空间与行为的互动关系研究——以关中地区L村公共空间为例[J]. 建筑学报, 2022, 25(S1): 225-230.[XU Yubin. The interactive relationship between space and behavior in settings of traditional settlements: A case study of public space of traditional village L in Guanzhong[J]. Architectural Journal, 2022, 25(S1): 225-230]
[23] 李长虹, 李小娟, 吕永泉. 基于拓扑建模的历史文化村镇聚居空间再生机制研究——以天津西井峪村为例[J]. 新建筑, 2016(4): 129-131.[LI Changhong, LI Xiaojuan, LYU Yongquan. A study on the space regeneration mechanisms of historic village based on the topological model: The case of Tianjin Xijingyu village[J]. New Architecture, 2016(4): 129-131]
[24] 邓巍, 胡海艳, 杨瑞鑫, 等. 传统乡村聚落空间的双构特征及保护启示[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2019, 253(6): 101-106.[DENG Wei, HU Haiyan, YANG Ruixin, et al. A study on the dual-structure characteristics of traditional rural settlements and implications[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2019, 253(6): 101-106] DOI: 10.16361/j.upf.201906013
[25] 梅策迎. 珠江三角洲传统聚落公共空间体系特征及意义探析——以明清顺德古镇为例[J]. 规划师, 2008, 152(8): 84-88.[MEI Ceying. The character and meaning of public space in the traditional villages of the Pearl River delta: A case study of the Shunde ancient town in the Ming and Qing dynasties[J]. Planners, 2008, 152(8): 84-88]
[26] 张永峰, 戴文远, 黄万里, 等. 民系视角下的福建省乡村聚落空间格局演化及特征[J]. 山地学报, 2023, 41(5): 701-715.[ZHANG Yongfeng, DAl Wenyuan, HUANG Wanli, et al. Spatial evolution of rural settlements in Fujian province of China from a perspective of folk group division[J]. Mountain Research, 2023, 41(5): 701-715] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000781
[27] 马晓蓉, 查小春. 秦巴山区乡村聚落空间格局演变及影响因子——以陕西宁强县为例[J]. 山地学报, 2020, 38(5): 726-739.[MA Xiaorong, ZHA Xiaochun. Spatial structure evolvement and Impact factors of rural settlements in the Qinba mountain area: A case study of Ningqiang county in Shaanxi province, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2020, 38(5): 726-739] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000550
[28] 胡航箫, 戴文远, 陈娟, 等. 基于集聚与生态价值组合特征的乡村聚落重构——以福州山区为例[J]. 山地学报, 2020, 38(1): 142-151.[HU Hangxiao, DAI Wenyuan, CHEN Juan, et al. A physiology of space reconstruction of rural settlements based on composite features of agglomeration effect and ecological effects: A case study of mountainous area of Fuzhou, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2020, 38(1): 142-151] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000498
[29] 王青. 长江上游山区聚落与水土保持的耦合机制[J]. 山地学报, 2007, 25(4): 455-460.[WANG Qing. The coupling mechanism s of rural settlements and water and soil conservation projects in the upper reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Mountain Research, 2007, 25(4): 455-460]

相似文献/References:

[1]穆振北,游巍斌*,张秀芳,等.中国世界遗产空间格局及其交通可及性分析[J].山地学报,2020,(3):436.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000523]
　MU Zhenbei,YOU Weibin*,ZHANG Xiufang,et al.Spatial Patterns and Transportation Accessibility Analysis of World Heritages in China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(1):436.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000523]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2023- 06-18; 改回日期(Accepted date):2024- 02-13
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家青年科学基金(52108005)。[Youth Fund of National Science Foundation of China(52108005)]
作者简介(Biography): 徐辉(1986-),男,博士,副教授,主要研究方向:村镇传统聚落与地域建筑技术。[XU Hui(1986-), male, Ph.D., associate professor, specialized in traditional rural settlements and regional architectural techniques] E-mail:abbsxh@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-01-30