[1]梁 韵,杨朝现*,信桂新,等.全域土地综合整治助推乡村发展动力机制及其效能评价——基于重庆的案例实证[J].山地学报,2025,(4):555-572.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000912]
　LIANG Yun,YANG Chaoxian*,XIN Guixin,et al.Dynamic Mechanism and Effectiveness Evaluation of Comprehensive Land Consolidation in Boosting Rural Development: An Empirical Study Based on Chongqing, China[J].Mountain Research,2025,(4):555-572.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000912]
点击复制

全域土地综合整治助推乡村发展动力机制及其效能评价——基于重庆的案例实证()

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2025年第4期
页码:
555-572
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2025-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Dynamic Mechanism and Effectiveness Evaluation of Comprehensive Land Consolidation in Boosting Rural Development: An Empirical Study Based on Chongqing, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2025)4-555-18
作者:
梁 韵1; 杨朝现1*; 信桂新2; 丁慧敏1; 3
(1.西南大学 资源环境学院,重庆 400715; 2.长江师范学院 经济与管理学院,重庆 408100; 3.武汉永业赛博能规划勘测有限公司,武汉 430000)
Author(s):
LIANG Yun1;  YANG Chaoxian1*;  XIN Guixin2;  DING Huimin1; 3
(1.College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 2. College of Economic and Management, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing 408100, China; 3. Wuhan Yongye Saiboneng Planning & Survey Limited Company, Wuhan 430000, China)
关键词:
全域土地综合整治;  乡村发展要素;  效能评价;  熵权TOPSIS模型;  重庆
Keywords:
comprehensive land consolidation;  elements of rural development;  effectiveness evaluation;  entropy-weight TOPSIS model;  Chongqing
分类号:
F301.2,F323.1
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000912
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在乡村振兴与城乡融合发展的时代背景下,全域土地综合整治作为破解乡村“四化”难题(耕地碎片化、空间布局无序化、土地利用低效化以及生态功能退化)的关键举措,已成为推动乡村全面振兴、促进城乡深度融合发展的核心抓手与重要引擎。既有研究虽揭示了全域整治与乡村发展的关联性,但作为土地整治的高级形态,其动力机制的系统解构与效能评价的量化分析仍存在研究缺口。本研究基于乡村发展要素识别,全面梳理全域土地综合整治对各发展要素的作用路径与影响机制,明晰其助推乡村发展的动力机制,构建了一套科学合理、针对性强的全域土地综合整治效能评价指标体系,并运用熵权TOPSIS模型,对重庆市3个具有典型代表性的全域土地综合整治试点核心区展开实证研究。研究发现,(1)全域土地综合整治基于4项整治内容(农用地整治、建设用地整治、生态保护与修复以及历史文化保护)和3类外部支持(项目与资金支持、政策支持以及外源主体支持),通过“内源要素激活提升-外源要素吸引导入-内外要素互促互融”的作用路径,激发乡村内生动力;(2)全域土地综合整治试点区的各维度效能得分集中在0.42～0.55,这表明全域土地综合整治在促进乡村产业发展、宜居建设、生态改善及文化传承等多个关键领域均发挥了显著的正向作用,但受到自然地理条件、经济发展水平与内外主体引领能力等方面的差异性影响,不同试点区的综合效能呈现出差距(YD-Ⅲ为0.56、YD-Ⅰ为0.42、YD-Ⅱ为0.40);(3)不同内外源要素组合作用下的乡村,尽管均遵循要素变化、流动到融合的动力机制,但在整治目标的设定、实施路径的选择以及转化效能等方面均呈现出差异性。综上,为进一步增强整治效能,后续实践应立足乡村优势内源,采取“以点带面”的差异化策略,以发展基础好的乡村为点,构建区域联动网络,并探索多元化的内外主体合作机制。本研究对丰富全域土地综合整治与乡村发展的理论体系具有创新价值,可以为整治实践优化提供科学依据与实践参考。
Abstract:
In the context of rural revitalization and urban-rural integrated development, comprehensive land consolidation, as a key measure to address the four major issues(fragmented farmland, disordered spatial layout, inefficient land use, and degraded ecological functions)in rural areas, has become a core driver and important engine for promoting comprehensive rural revitalization and facilitating deep urban-rural integration.
Although studies revealed the correlation between comprehensive land consolidation and rural development, as an advanced form of land consolidation, there remains a research gap in the systematic deconstruction of its dynamic mechanism and quantitative analysis of effectiveness evaluation.
In this study, it comprehensively examined the impact pathways and mechanisms of comprehensive land consolidation on various rural development elements based on their identification, and elucidated its dynamic mechanism of rural development promotion. A scientific, reasonable and highly targeted evaluation index system for comprehensive land consolidation for a region was constructed, and it employed the entropy-weighted TOPSIS model to conduct empirical research on three representative pilot core zones of comprehensive land consolidation in Chongqing, China.
(1)The research findings are as follows: Based on 4 consolidation measures(agricultural land consolidation, construction land consolidation, ecological protection and restoration, and historical and cultural preservation)and 3 types of external support(project and funding support, policy support, and external stakeholders support), comprehensive land consolidation stimulated rural endogenous dynamics through the action pathway as described by activating and enhancing internal elements attracting and introducing external elements promoting mutual promotion and integration of internal and external elements.
(2)The effectiveness scores across all dimensions for the pilot zones of comprehensive land consolidation in Chongqing ranged between 0.42 and 0.55, indicating that comprehensive land consolidation exerted significant positive effects on multiple key dimensions such as promoting rural industrial development, building livable communities, improving ecology, and inheriting culture. However, influenced by the diversity of natural geographical conditions, differences in economic development levels, and variations in the leading capabilities of internal and external stakeholders, the comprehensive effectiveness varied among the three pilot zones(YD-Ⅲ: 0.56, YD-Ⅰ: 0.42, YD-Ⅱ: 0.40).
(3)Under the joint effects of different internal and external elements, although all rural areas followed the dynamic mechanism of element change, flow, and integration, they exhibited differences in the setting of consolidation goals, the selection of implementation paths, and the transformation effectiveness.
In conclusion, to further enhance the effectiveness of consolidation, subsequent practices should be based on the advantageous endogenous elements of rural areas, adopt a differentiated strategy of "point-to-area" with well-developed rural areas as the point to build a regional linkage network, and explore diversified cooperation mechanisms between internal and external stakeholders.
This study holds innovative value in enriching the theoretical system of comprehensive land consolidation and rural development, and can provide scientific basis and practical reference for optimizing consolidation practices.

参考文献/References:

[1] 许恒周. 全域土地综合整治助推乡村振兴的机理与实施路径[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2021, 377(5): 144-152. [XU Hengzhou. Research on the mechanism and implementation path of comprehensive land consolidation to promote rural revitalization [J]. Guizhou Social Sciences, 2021, 377(5): 144-152] DOI: 10.13713/j.cnki.cssci.2021.05.020
[2] JIANG Yanfeng, LONG Hualou, TANG Yuting, et al. The impact of land consolidation on rural vitalization at village level: A case study of a Chinese village [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2021, 86: 485-496. DOI: 10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2021.07.004
[3] 金晓斌, 张晓琳, 范业婷, 等. 乡村发展要素视域下乡村发展类型与全域土地综合整治模式探析[J]. 现代城市研究, 2021(3): 2-10. [JIN Xiaobin, ZHANG Xiaolin, FAN Yeting, et al. Analysis on the types of rural development and comprehensive land consolidation models from the perspective of rural development elements [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2021(3): 2-10] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2021.03.001
[4] 金晓斌, 罗秀丽, 周寅康. 试论全域土地综合整治的基本逻辑、关键问题和主要关系[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(11): 1-12. [JIN Xiaobin, LUO Xiuli, ZHOU Yinkang. Basic logic, key issues and main relations of comprehensive land consolidation [J]. China Land Science, 2022, 36(11): 1-12] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20220920.095400
[5] 孙婧雯, 刘彦随, 戈大专, 等. 平原农区土地综合整治与乡村转型发展协同机制[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(8): 1971-1986. [SUN Jingwen, LIU Yansui, GE Dazhuan, et al. Coordinated mechanism between comprehensive land consolidation and rural transformation development in plain agricultural areas of China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(8): 1971-1986] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202208009
[6] YIN Qiqi, SUI Xueyan, YE Bei, et al. What role does land consolidation play in the multi-dimensional rural revitalization in China? A research synthesis [J]. Land Use Policy, 2022, 120: 106261. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106261
[7] 范业婷, 金晓斌, 张晓琳, 等. 乡村重构视角下全域土地综合整治的机制解析与案例研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(4): 109-118. [FAN Yeting, JIN Xiaobin, ZHANG Xiaolin, et al. Mechanism analysis and case study of comprehensive land consolidation from the perspective of rural restructuring [J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(4): 109-118] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20210415.085928
[8] 龚华, 仝德, 张楚婧, 等. 城乡融合视角下的全域土地综合整治模式优化[J]. 规划师, 2023, 39(12): 38-44+52. [GONG Hua, TONG De, ZHANG Chujing, et al. Optimization of comprehensive land consolidation model under the context of urban-rural integration [J]. Planners, 2023, 39(12): 38-44+52] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2023.12.006
[9] 罗秀丽, 金晓斌, 刘笑杰, 等. 共生理论视角下全域土地综合整治助推城市边缘区城乡融合机制与模式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(5): 1053-1067. [LUO Xiuli, JIN Xiaobin, LIU Xiaojie, et al. Mechanism and model of comprehensive land consolidation promoting urban-rural integration in peri-urban from the perspective of symbiosis theory [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(5): 1053-1067] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20240505
[10] 刘恬, 胡伟艳, 杜晓华, 等. 基于村庄类型的全域土地综合整治研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(5): 100-108. [LIU Tian, HU Weiyan, DU Xiaohua, et al. Comprehensive land consolidation based on village types [J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(5): 100-108] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20210506.100645
[11] 龙花楼, 张英男, 屠爽爽. 论土地整治与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849. [LONG Hualou, ZHANG Yingnan, TU Shuangshuang. Land consolidation and rural vitalization [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
[12] 何硕研, 方相, 杨钢桥. 土地综合整治能促进乡村产业转型吗?——来自湖北省部分乡村的证据[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(4): 107-117. [HE Shuoyan, FANG Xiang, YANG Gangqiao. Can comprehensive land consolidation promote the transformation of rural industries? Evidence from some villages in Hubei province [J]. China Land Science, 2022, 36(4): 107-117] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20220330.083953
[13] 乔蕻强, 鄢继选, 马世瑛, 等. 贫困区土地整治减贫增收效应研究[J]. 山地学报, 2021, 39(5): 734-744. [QIAO Hongqiang, YAN Jixuan, MA Shiying, et al. On the effect of poverty reduction and income increase in poverty areas, China [J]. Mountain Research, 2021, 39(5): 734-744] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000634
[14] 鲁胜晗, 朱成立, 周建新, 等. 生态景观视角下土地整治的生态效益评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(5): 311-317. [LU Shenghan, ZHU Chengli, ZHOU Jianxin, et al. Evaluation on ecological benefit of land remediation from the perspective of ecological and landscape [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(5): 311-317] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.05.040
[15] 梁浩源, 李晶. 全域土地综合整治中文化空间再识别及其与三生空间的融合提升[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2024, 29(3): 189-203. [LIANG Haoyuan, LI Jing. Re-identification of cultural space and its integration with productive-living-ecological space in comprehensive land consolidation [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2024, 29(3): 189-203] DOI: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2024.03.17
[16] 吴家龙, 李红举, 邓婷, 等. 论全域土地综合整治与线性文化遗产保护利用: 衔接与融合——以广东省南粤古驿道梅关古道古田段为例[J]. 热带地理, 2024, 44(3): 379-392. [WU Jialong, LI Hongju, DENG Ting, et al. Comprehensive land consolidation and linear cultural heritage protection, utilization, cohesion and integration: A case study of the Gutian section of the Meiguan Historical Trail, south China historical trail, Guangdong province [J]. Tropical Geography, 2024, 44(3): 379-392] DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003836
[17] 梅文静, 郭青霞, 李淑红, 等. 基于风貌提升视角的乡村全域土地综合整治策略——以和顺县阳光占村为例[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2025, 42(3): 804-814. [MEI Wenjing, GUO Qingxia, LI Shuhong, et al. Strategy of comprehensive land improvement in rural areas from the perspective of landscape improvement: A case study of Yangguangzhan village in Heshun county [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2025, 42(3): 804-814] DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2024.0217
[18] 信桂新, 陈兰, 杨庆媛. 土地整治促进城乡统筹发展——基于重庆的实践考察[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 42(6): 65-72. [XIN Guixin, CHEN Lan, YANG Qingyuan. Land consolidation on how to promote rural-urban integration based on practice of Chongqing region [J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 42(6): 65-72] DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2017.06.012
[19] 张富刚, 刘彦随. 中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 163(2): 115-122. [ZHANG Fugang, LIU Yansui. Dynamic mechanism and models of regional rural development in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 163(2): 115-122] DOI: 10.11821/xb200802001
[20] 叶强, 钟炽兴. 乡建, 我们准备好了吗——乡村建设系统理论框架研究[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10): 1843-1858. [YE Qiang, ZHONG Chixing. Have we been ready for rural construction: Research on the theoretical framework of rural construction system [J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(10): 1843-1858] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201710003
[21] 屠爽爽, 龙花楼, 李婷婷, 等. 中国村镇建设和农村发展的机理与模式研究[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(12): 141-147. [TU Shuangshuang, LONG Hualou, LI Tingting, et al. The mechanism and models of villages and towns construction and rural development in China [J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(12): 141-147] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.12.020
[22] 谢臻, 张凤荣, 陈松林, 等. 中国乡村振兴要素识别与发展类型诊断——基于99个美丽乡村示范村的信息挖掘分析[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(6): 1048-1058. [XIE Zhen, ZHANG Fengrong, CHEN Songlin, et al. Development types of rural revitalization based on the identification of development elements in China [J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1048-1058] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2019.06.04
[23] 常绍舜. 从经典系统论到现代系统论[J]. 系统科学学报, 2011, 19(3): 1-4. [CHANG Shaoshun. From classical system in the case of modern system theory [J]. Journal of Systems Science, 2011, 19(3): 1-4]
[24] 吴丽娟, 刘玉亭, 程慧. 城乡统筹发展的动力机制和关键内容研究述评[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(4): 113-118. [WU Lijuan, LIU Yuting, CHENG Hui. Review on the dynamic mechanism and key elements of urban-rural integrated development in China [J]. Economic Geography, 2012, 32(4): 113-118] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2012.04.020
[25] 戴柳燕, 周国华, 何兰. 乡村吸引力的概念及其形成机制[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(8): 177-184. [DAI Liuyan, ZHOU Guohua, HE Lan. Rural attraction: Concept and formation mechanism [J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(8): 177-184] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.08.021
[26] 应苏辰, 金晓斌, 罗秀丽, 等. 全域土地综合整治助力乡村空心化治理的作用机制探析: 基于乡村功能演化视角[J]. 中国土地科学, 2023, 37(11): 84-94. [YING Suchen, JIN Xiaobin, LUO Xiuli, et al. Functioning mechanism of comprehensive land consolidation governing rural hollowing from the perspective of rural-function evolution [J]. China Land Science, 2023, 37(11): 84-94] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20231023.085910
[27] 李秋芳, 汪文雄, 崔永正, 等. 组织关系视角下全域土地综合整治多元主体协同治理的逻辑框架与网络形式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(4): 912-928. [LI Qiufang, WANG Wenxiong, CUI Yongzheng, et al. A logical framework and network form of multi-subject collaborative governance in comprehensive land consolidation from an organizational relationship perspective [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(4): 912-928] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20240410
[28] 周小平, 申端帅, 谷晓坤, 等. 大都市全域土地综合整治与耕地多功能——基于“情境—结构—行为—结果”的分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(9): 94-104. [ZHOU Xiaoping, SHEN Duanshuai, GU Xiaokun, et al. Comprehensive land consolidation and multifunctional cultivated land in metropolis: The analysis based on the “situation-structure-implementation-outcome” [J]. China Land Science, 2021, 35(9): 94-104] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20210826.093639
[29] 王义方, 程琳琳, 郑洋. 村庄综合效能评价指标体系构建及应用——以山东省新泰市为例[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(5): 1156-1168. [WANG Yifang, CHENG Linlin, ZHENG Yang. Construction and application of an evaluation index system for the comprehensive effectiveness assessment of villages: A case study of Xintai city, Shandong province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2023, 40(5): 1156-1168] DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2023.0129
[30] 应苏辰, 金晓斌, 陈艳林, 等. 耦合ANT-SPO的全域土地综合整治绩效评价:方法与实证[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(10): 81-90. [YING Suchen, JIN Xiaobin, CHEN Yanlin, et al. Empirical study and analysis of performance evaluation of comprehensive land consolidation coupled with ANT and SPO [J]. China Land Science, 2022, 36(10): 81-90] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20221005.234525
[31] 干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(5): 4-16. [GAN Chunhui, ZHENG Ruogu, YU Dianfan. An empirical study on the effects of industrial structure on economic growth and fluctuations in China [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2011, 46(5): 4-16]
[32] 范垚, 杨庆媛, 张瑞頠, 等. 基于城乡统筹发展的农村土地综合整治绩效研究——以重庆市典型项目区为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(11): 68-77. [FAN Yao, YANG Qingyuan, ZHANG Ruiwei, et al. Performance evaluation of rural land comprehensive consolidation on urban-rural untegrated development: A case study of typical projects in Chongqing [J]. China Land Science, 2016, 30(11): 68-77] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20161207.145122
[33] 陈会广, 李浩华, 张耀宇, 等. 土地整治中农民居住方式变化的生态环境行为效应分析[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(10): 2067-2074. [CHEN Huiguang, LI Haohua, ZHANG Yaoyu, et al. The impact of changes in farmers' residences on eco-environmental behavior during land consolidation in Nanjing [J]. Resources Science, 2013, 35(10): 2067-2074]
[34] 信桂新, 杨朝现, 杨庆媛, 等. 用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(1): 238-249. [XIN Guixin, YANG Chaoxian, YANG Qingyuan, et al. Post-evaluation of well-facilitied capital farmland construction based on entropy weight method and improved TOPSIS model [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(1): 238-249] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.01.033
[35] 程启月. 评测指标权重确定的结构熵权法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(7): 1225-1228. [CHENG Qiyue. Structure entropy weight method to confirm the weight of evaluating index [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2010, 30(7): 1225-1228] DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2010)7-1225
[36] 姜棪峰, 龙花楼, 唐郁婷. 土地整治与乡村振兴——土地利用多功能性视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3): 487-497. [JIANG Yanfeng, LONG Hualou, TANG Yuting. Land consolidation and rural vitalization: A perspective of land use multifunctionality [J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3): 487-497] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.012
[37] 杨斌, 王占岐, 胡学东. 基于改进可拓物元模型的土地整治项目绩效评价及影响因素分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(7): 66-73. [YANG Bin, WANG Zhanqi, HU Xuedong. Performance assessment and impact factors of land consolidation project based on improved extension matter-element model [J]. China Land Science, 2018, 32(7): 66-73] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20180521.110052
[38] 曹飞, 邵景安. 西南丘陵区土地整治成效评价研究——以重庆垫江为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(1): 204-212. [CAO Fei, SHAO Jing'an. The evaluation of land consolidation effect in hilly region of southwest China: A case study in Dianjiang, Chongqing [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(1): 204-212] DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20180129

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2025- 02-24; 改回日期(Accepted date):2025- 08-18
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家自然科学基金(42171257)。 [National Natural Science Foundation of China(42171257)]
作者简介(Biography): 梁韵(1999-),女,贵州铜仁人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:国土空间规划与国土综合整治。[LIANG Yun(1999-), female, born in Tongren, Guizhou Province, M.Sc. candidate, research on land space planning and comprehensive land consolidation] E-mail: liangyun59@email.swu.edu.cn
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 杨朝现(1971-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向:国土空间规划与国土综合整治。[YANG Chaoxian(1971-), male, Ph.D., professor, research on land space planning and comprehensive land consolidation] E-mail: yangcx@swu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-08-20