[1]杜星宇,邓 伟*.乡村景观研究国内外回顾与展望[J].山地学报,2025,(2):286-302.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000893]
 DU Xingyu,DENG Wei*.A Review and Prospect of Rural Landscape Research:A Domestic and International Perspective[J].Mountain Research,2025,(2):286-302.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000893]
点击复制

乡村景观研究国内外回顾与展望()
分享到:

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2025年第2期
页码:
286-302
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2025-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Review and Prospect of Rural Landscape Research:A Domestic and International Perspective
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2025)2-286-17
作者:
杜星宇邓 伟*
(四川师范大学 地理与资源科学学院,成都 610101)
Author(s):
DU Xingyu DENG Wei*
(The Faculty Geography Resource Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)
关键词:
乡村景观 乡村振兴 城乡融合 中外对比
Keywords:
rural landscape rural revitalization urban-rural integration China-foreign comparison
分类号:
K928.5
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000893
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
乡村空间提质增效是乡村发展的核心任务,乡村景观重塑是破解城乡空间重构困境的关键路径。乡村景观不仅是自然生态本底与人文历史脉络的复合载体,更是构筑兼具乡愁记忆与诗意栖居意象的空间媒介,对实现国土空间高质量发展具有战略意义。本研究基于Citespace知识图谱可视化技术,对Web of Science与CNKI核心数据库展开文献计量分析,从定性与定量双维度阐释欧洲、美洲、日本及中国乡村景观研究的学术谱系。结果表明:(1)中外乡村景观演进与研究范式均深刻嵌入于特定的社会经济-地域情境,呈现显著的区域差异性。(2)文化制度与思想传统的差异导致中外研究路径分化,西方研究聚焦生物多样性保育、生态系统服务评估及政策驱动型景观治理,而中国研究则经历从传统聚落形态解析到景观基因识别、文化价值评估的范式转型。(3)国内研究可划分四个阶段,空间维度上形成“自然-文化”两维特性的地域性认知模型。本综述旨在为乡村振兴战略下的空间治理提供理论梳理,助力乡村景观重塑成为承载乡愁记忆、彰显生态价值、激发内生动力的复合载体。
Abstract:
Enhancing the quality and efficiency of rural spaces constitutes a core task for rural development, and reshaping rural landscapes serves as a critical pathway to address the dilemmas of urban-rural spatial restructuring. Rural landscapes not only are integrated carriers of natural ecological background and socio-historical contexts, but also visual medium that embody nostalgic memories and poetic living imagery, holding strategic significance for achieving high-quality territorial spatial development.
In this study it employed Citespace knowledge graph visualization technology to conduct a bibliometric analysis of selected literatures in Web of Science and CNKI core databases, interpreting the academic lineage of rural landscape research in Europe, the Americas, Japan, and China from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives.
(1)The results indicate: The evolution and research paradigms of rural landscapes in China and abroad were deeply embedded in specific socio-economic and regional contexts, exhibiting marked spatial heterogeneity.
(2)Divergent cultural institutions and intellectual traditions led to distinct research trajectories: Western studies concerned about biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service assessment, and policy-driven landscape governance, whereas Chinese research demonstrated phased evolution characteristics, transitioning from analysis of traditional settlement morphology to landscape gene identification and cultural value evaluation.
(3)Domestic research exhibited four stage-specific characteristics, forming a regional cognitive model characterized by “nature-culture” dual dimensions in spatial contexts.
This review aims to provide theoretical clarity for spatial governance under the rural revitalization strategy, facilitating the transformation of rural landscapes into multi-functional platforms that preserve nostalgic memory, highlight ecological values, and stimulate endogenous development momentum.

参考文献/References:

[1] 何峰. 欧美学术界“景观”概念变迁及相关研究进展[J]. 国际城市规划, 2014, 29(4): 133-135. [HE Feng. The conceptual changes and related research progress of “landscape” in the academic community of Europe and America [J]. Urban Planning International, 2014, 29(4): 133-135]
[2] 肖遥, 李方正, 李雄. 英国乡村景观变迁中的文化驱动力[J]. 中国园林, 2015, 31(8): 45-49. [XIAO Yao, LI Fangzheng, LI Xiong. The history and cultural driving forces of rural landscape in Britain [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2015,31(8): 45-49] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2015.08.011
[3] 马存琛, 华钰蓉, 陆明华. 基于生态发展角度的乡村景观研究进展[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2019, 46(1): 49-52. [MA Cunchen, HUA Yurong, LU Minghua. Research progress on rural landscape from the perspective of ecological development [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2019, 46(1): 49-52] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.01.011
[4] 谢花林, 刘黎明, 李蕾. 乡村景观规划设计的相关问题探讨[J]. 中国园林, 2003, 19(3): 39-41. [XIE Hualin, LIU Liming, LI Lei. Preliminary study on the correlative problem of the rural landscape planning [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2003, 19(3): 39-41] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2003.03.011
[5] 王云才. 现代乡村景观旅游规划设计[M]. 青岛: 青岛出版社, 2003: 1-12. [WANG Yuncai. Modern rural landscape tourism planning and design [M]. Qingdao: Qingdao Publishing House, 2003: 1-12]
[6] 金其铭, 董昕, 张小林. 乡村地理学[M]. 南京: 江苏教育出版社, 1990: 247-283. [JIN Qiming, DONG Xin, ZHANG Xiaolin. Rural Geography [M]. Nanjing: Jiangsu Publishing House, 1990: 247-283]
[7] 刘滨谊. 人类聚居环境学引论[J]. 城市规划汇刊, 1996(4): 5-11+65. [LIU Binyi. Introduction to human settlement environment studies [J]. Urban Planning Forum, 1996(4): 5-11+65]
[8] 罗涛, 黄婷婷, 张立峰, 等. 基于生态-文化空间关联的乡土景观区划方法研究[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(7): 77-82. [LUO Tao, HUANG Tingting, ZHANG Lifeng, et al. The approach of vernacular landscape zoning based on spatial correlation of ecological and cultural spaces [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(7): 77-82] DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.07.0077
[9] 俞孔坚, 王志芳, 黄国平. 论乡土景观及其对现代景观设计的意义[J]. 华中建筑, 2005(4): 123-126. [YU Kongjian, WANG Zhifang, HUANG Guoping. Discussion about the vernacular landscapes and their implications to modern landscape architecture [J]. Huazhong Architecture, 2005(4): 123-126] DOI: 10.13942/j.cnki.hzjz.2005.04.039
[10] 岳邦瑞, 郎小龙, 张婷婷, 等. 我国乡土景观研究的发展历程、学科领域及其评述[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(12): 1563-1570. [YUE Bangrui, LANG Xiaolong, ZHANG Tingting, et al. Research review on development stages and disciplinary fields of vernacular landscapes in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(12): 1563-1570] DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.01563
[11] 王大芳, 辛转霞, 韩宏. 郊野公园绿地乡土景观营造手法应用——以山西省圣天湖湿地公园为例[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(6): 181-185. [WANG Dafang, XIN Zhuanxia, HAN Hong. Application of construction skill of vernacular landscape in country park-take Shengtianhu Wet-land Park in Shanxi province as an example [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2010, 25(6): 181-185]
[12] 黄昕珮. 论乡土景观——《Discovering Vernacular Landscape》与乡土景观概念[J]. 中国园林, 2008, 24(7): 87-91. [HUANG Xinpei. Discussion on vernacular landscape-discovering vernacular landscape and the concept of vernacular landscape [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2008, 24(7): 87-91] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2008.07.023
[13] 张丹. 19世纪以来欧洲国家景观政策研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2011: 1-204. [ZHANG Dan. A study on the landscape policy in Europe countries since nineteenth century [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2011: 1-204]
[14] 付岩岩. 欧盟共同农业政策的演变及启示[J]. 世界农业, 2013(9): 54-57. [FU Yanyan. The evolution and enlightenment of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy [J]. World Agriculture, 2013(9): 54-57] DOI: 10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2013.09.019
[15] GULLINO P, DEVECCHI M, LARCHER F. How can different stakeholders contribute to rural landscape planning policy? The case study of Pralormo municipality(Italy)[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2018, 57: 99-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.002
[16] 芦千文, 姜长云. 欧盟农业农村政策的演变及其对中国实施乡村振兴战略的启示[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(10): 119-135. [LU Qianwen, JIANG Changyun. The evolution of the European Union's agriculture and rural policies and enlightenment to China's rural revitalization strategy [J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(10): 119-135] DOI: 10.20077/j.cnki.11-1262/f.2018.10.009
[17] SKLENICKA P, SÍMOVP, HRDINOV K, et al. Changing rural landscapes along the border of Austria and the Czech Republic between 1952 and 2009: Roles of political, socioeconomic and environmental factors [J]. Applied Geography, 2014, 47: 89-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.12.006
[18] PALMER G C, FRY A, LIBALA N, et al. Engaging society and building participatory governance in a rural landscape restoration context [J]. Anthropocene, 2022, 37: 100320. DOI: 10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100320
[19] ZASADA I, HÄFNER K, SCHALLER L, et al. A conceptual model to integrate the regional context in landscape policy, management and contribution to rural development: Literature review and European case study evidence [J]. Geoforum, 2017, 82: 8-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.012
[20] DOMON G. Landscape as resource: Consequences, challenges and opportunities for rural development [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 100: 338-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.014
[21] SKLENICKA P, KOTTOVÁB, ÁLEK M. Success in preserving historic rural landscapes under various policy measures: Incentives, restrictions or planning? [J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2017, 75: 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.010
[22] GULLINO P, BATTISTI L, NOVELLI S, et al. The landscape impact of agricultural sheds in rural UNESCO site: Public preferences and mitigation solutions [J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2023, 140: 232-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.12.009
[23] ALBALADEJO-GARCÍA J A, ZABALA J A, ALCON F, et al. Integrating socio-spatial preference heterogeneity into the assessment of the aesthetic quality of a Mediterranean agricultural landscape [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, 239: 104846. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104846
[24] FRONTUTO V, CORSI A, NOVELLI S, et al. The visual impact of agricultural sheds on rural landscapes: The willingness to pay for mitigation solutions and treatment effects [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 91: 104337. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104337
[25] PETIT S. The dimensions of land use change in rural landscapes: Lessons learnt from the GB Countryside Surveys [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90: 2851-2856. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.023
[26] WATMOUGH G R, PALM C A, SULLIVAN C. An operational framework for object-based land use classification of heterogeneous rural landscapes [J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2017, 54: 134-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.09.012
[27] HORAK J, PELTANOVA A, PODAVKOVA A, et al. Biodiversity responses to land use in traditional fruit orchards of a rural agricultural landscape [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2013, 178: 71-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.020
[28] COUSINS S A O. Landscape history and soil properties affect grassland decline and plant species richness in rural landscapes [J]. Biological Conservation, 2009, 142: 2752-2758. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.001
[29] LEDDA A, PINDOZZI S, MARCHEGGIANI E, et al. The impact of collaboration on research about rural buildings and landscape: A case study in Italy [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 97: 104757. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104757
[30] RUIZ J, DOMON G. Relationships between rural inhabitants and their landscapes in areas of intensive agricultural use: A case study in Quebec(Canada)[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012, 28: 590-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.09.005
[31] MASTRANGELO M E, CIANI A, WEYLAND F, et al. Easier said than done: Shifting social imaginaries of rural landscapes of the Chaco-Pampas plain, Argentina(1996-2020)[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2023, 103: 103093. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103093
[32] TOLEDO R M, SANTOS R F, VERHEYEN K, et al. Ecological restoration efforts in tropical rural landscapes: Challenges and policy implications in a highly degraded region [J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 75: 486-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.053
[33] 潘启龙, 韩振, 陈珏颖. 美国农村阶段发展及对中国乡村振兴的启示[J]. 世界农业, 2021(9): 76-82. [PAN Qilong, HAN Zhen, CHEN Jueying. The evolution of American rural development and its enlightenment to China's Rural Revitalization [J]. World Agriculture, 2021(9): 76-82] DOI: 10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2021.09.008
[34] QUINN J E, PEDERSON C, VICKERY C E, et al. Acoustic indices are responsive to local-scale but not landscape-scale agricultural land use [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 160: 111868. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111868
[35] LOKOCZ E, RYAN R L, SADLER A J. Motivations for land protection and stewardship: Exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 99: 65-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.015
[36] KLEIN L R, HENDRIX W G, LOHR V I, et al. Linking ecology and aesthetics in sustainable agricultural landscapes: Lessons from the Palouse region of Washington, U.S.A. [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 134: 195-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.019
[37] MA Shan, SWINTON S M. Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices [J]. Ecological Economics, 2011, 70: 1649-1659. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.004
[38] LESSI B F, GENELETTI D, CORTINOVIS C, et al. Bird richness and Ecosystems Services across an urban to natural gradient in south-eastern Brazil: Implications for landscape planning and future scenarios [J]. One Ecosystem, 2024, 9: e114955. DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.9.e114955
[39] GANTZ A G, YÁÑEZ-ALVARADO M, ZAMORANO G, et al. Contrasting responses of taxonomic diversity and functional groups of birds to the agricultural landscape of southern Chile [J]. Ornithology Research, 2024, 32: 357-371. DOI: 10.1007/s43388-024-00191-3
[40] GONZALEZ C, RODEWALD A D, ARCESE P, et al. Effect of local habitat and landscape attributes on bird communities in shade coffee plantations in the Colombian Andes [J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2024, 55: e03207. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03207
[41] PARRON L M, VILLANUEVA A J, GLENK K. Estimating the value of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes amid intensification pressures: The Brazilian case [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2022, 57: 101476. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101476
[42] GUERISOLI M M, SCHIAFFINI M I. Landscape connectivity in South America: An assessment of the current knowledge and a case study using protected areas of Argentina [J]. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 2024, 9: 108-119. DOI: 10.1007/s40823-024-00100-w
[43] GONZÁLEZ-CALLE J L. Metropolitan expansion and rural change in the peri-urban edge Medellín-Rionegro(Colombia)[J]. Journal of Urban Management, 2024, 13: 521-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.jum.2024.05.007
[44] 苏东宾, 聂志勇, 李焰. 日本民居的保护与传承研究[J]. 建筑与文化, 2014(6): 134-135. [SU Dongbin, NIE Zhiyong, LI Yan. Study on the protection and inheritance of Japanese traditional dwellings [J]. Architecture and Culture, 2014(6): 134-135] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4909.2014.06.033
[45] 李亮, 谈明洪. 日本町村聚落演变特征分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2020, 37(6): 767-774. [LI Liang, TAN Minghong. Analysis on the evolution characteristics of rural villages in Japan [J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 37(6): 767-774] DOI: 10.7523/j.issn.2095-6134.2020.06.007
[46] 王洁, 王丝申, 杨若涵, 等. 文化景观保护: 日本传统乡村的活态传承[J]. 建筑与文化, 2019(3): 40-42. [WANG Jie, WANG Sishen, YANG Ruohan, et al. Cultural landscape protection: Living inheritance of traditional Japanese villages [J]. Architecture & Culture, 2019(3): 40-42]
[47] INDRAWAN M, YABE M, NOMURA H, et al. Deconstructing satoyama-the socio-ecological landscape in Japan [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014, 64: 77-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.038
[48] ICHIKAWA K, OKUBO N, OKUBO S, et al. Transition of the satoyama landscape in the urban fringe of the Tokyo metropolitan area from 1880 to 2001 [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 78: 398-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.001
[49] MORIMOTO Y. What is Satoyama? Points for discussion on its future direction [J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2011, 7: 163-171. DOI: 10.1007/s11355-010-0120-5
[50] KOBAYASHI Y, KOIKE F. Separating the effects of land-use history and topography on the distribution of woody plant populations in a traditional rural landscape in Japan [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 95: 34-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.003
[51] SEHRA K K, MACMILLAN D C. Wildlife-friendly food requires a multi-stakeholder approach to deliver landscape-scale biodiversity conservation in the Satoyama landscape of Japan [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 297: 113275. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113275
[52] CHIANG Yencheng, WENG Peiyi, SATO N. The preservation of important rural Japanese cultural landscapes: Considering the Warabino Paddy Field as an example [J]. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 2013, 58(1): 209-218. DOI: 10.5109/26182
[53] FURUKORI N, KISHIMOTO-YAMADA K, HOMMA K. Impacts of burning and herbicide disturbances on soil animals and organic matter decomposition in Terraced Paddy Field Levees in Japanese Satoyama [J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2022, 22: 270-280. DOI: 10.1007/s42729-021-00646-2
[54] KATAYAMA N, ODAYA Y, AMANO T, et al. Spatial and temporal associations between fallow fields and Greater Painted Snipe density in Japanese rice paddy landscapes [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2020, 295: 106892. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106892
[55] CHEN Bixia, QIU Zhenmian, NAKAMURA K. Tourist preferences for agricultural landscapes: A case study of terraced paddy fields in Noto Peninsula, Japan [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13: 1880-1892. DOI: 10.1007/s11629-015-3564-0
[56] ASAOKA S, SUMIKAWA F, WATANABE Y, et al. Throughfall and stemflow chemical dynamics of Satoyama, a traditional secondary forest system under threat in Japan [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2022, 33: 813-826. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-021-01429-2
[57] YAMASHITA R. Nexus of the awareness of ecosystem services as a “public-benefit value” and “utility value for consumption”: An economic evaluation of the agricultural culture of Satoyama in Japan [J]. Sustainable Business and Economics, 2021, 1: 133. DOI: 10.1007/s43546-021-00135-9
[58] 马嘉, 张云路, 李雄. 基于生活空间协同的日本乡村景观营造模式及借鉴[J]. 中国城市林业, 2019, 17(4): 73-77+82. [MA Jia, ZHANG Yunlu, LI Xiong. Astudy of rural landscaping based on living space synergy in Japan [J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2019, 17(4): 73-77+82] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2019.00.034
[59] 董新. 乡村景观类型划分的意义、原则及指标体系[J]. 人文地理, 1990(2): 49-52+78. [DONG Xin. The significance, principles and index system of rural landscape classification [J]. Human Geography, 1990(2): 49-52+78]
[60] 韩锋. 世界遗产文化景观及其国际新动向[J]. 中国园林, 2007, 23(11): 18-21. [HAN Feng. World heritage cultural landscapes and new international trends [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2007, 23(11): 18-21] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2007.11.006
[61] 李淑文. 人类中心主义与非人类中心主义的论争与评析——基于人与自然关系的反思[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(S1): 13-16. [LI Shuwen. Anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism debate and analysis based on the relationship between man and nature, reflection [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(S1): 13-16]
[62] 吴盛博. 文化记忆理论的演变及现实意义[J]. 外语学刊, 2021(6): 123-126. [WU Shengbo. The evolution of cultural memory theory and its practical significance [J]. Foreign Language Research, 2021(6): 123-126] DOI: 10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2021.06.020
[63] 何黎萍. 美国西部土地立法与农业的资本主义化[J]. 社会科学战线, 1998(2): 173-179. [HE Liping. Legislation on land and the capitalization of agriculture in western of the United States [J]. Social Science Front, 1998(2): 173-179]
[64] 王向彬, 朱铨. 乡村韧性研究进展与展望[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2022, 38(3): 321-327. [WANG Xiangbin, ZHU Quan. Research progress and prospect of rural resilience [J]. Resource Development & Market, 2022, 38(3): 321-327] DOI: 10.3696/j.issn.1005-8141.2022.03.009
[65] 李隆虎. 同一文化,多个世界?——评美洲印第安视角主义[J]. 思想战线, 2016, 42(3): 31-38. [LI Longhu. One culture, multiple worlds? -A critique of Amerindian perspectivism [J]. Thinking, 2016, 42(3): 31-38]
[66] 顾鸿雁. 日本乡村振兴转型的新模式:“地域循环共生圈”的实践与启示[J]. 现代日本经济, 2020, 39(6): 48-59. [GU Hongyan. Japan's rural revitalization in transition: The practice and implications of the “Regional Circular and Ecological Sphere”: Aproach [J]. Contemporary Economy of Japan, 2020, 39(6): 48-59] DOI: 10.16123/j.cnki.issn.1000-355x.2020.06.005
[67] 王国恩, 杨康, 毛志强. 展现乡村价值的社区营造——日本魅力乡村建设的经验[J]. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(1): 13-18. [WANG Guoen, YANG Kang, MAO Zhiqiang. Community building showing the potential value of country: Japan's charming country construction experience [J]. Urban Development Studies, 2016, 23(1): 13-18] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2016.01.003
[68] 段锴丰, 施建刚, 吴光东, 等. 城乡融合系统: 理论阐释、结构解析及运行机制分析[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38(3): 1-10+68. [DUAN Kaifeng, SHI Jiangang, WU Guangdong, et al. Urban-rural integration system: Theory explanation, structure and operation mechanism analysis [J]. Human Geography, 2023, 38(3): 1-10+68] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.03.001
[69] 王燚. 近十年来国内环境美学研究述评[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 18(3): 57-66. [WANG Yi. A review of China's environmental aesthetics in the past decade [J]. Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences), 2011, 18(3): 57-66] DOI: 10.3696/j.issn1007-6522.2011.03.006
[70] 吴启焰, 王兆杰. 布尔迪厄的文化资本理论在旅游规划中的应用[J]. 人文地理, 2011, 26(1): 113-117. [WU Qiyan, WANG Zhaojie. The application of Bourdieu's theory of cultural capital in tourism planning [J]. Human Geography, 2011, 26(1): 113-117] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.01.008
[71] 李振鹏, 刘黎明, 谢花林. 乡村景观分类的方法探析——以北京市海淀区白家疃村为例[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27(2): 167-173. [LI Zhenpeng, LIU Liming, XIE Hualin. Methodology of rural landscape classification: A case study in Baijiatuan Village, Haidian District, Beijing [J]. Resource Science, 2005, 27(2): 167-173]
[72] 李向婷. 乡村景观分类与评价研究——以长沙县乌川湖村为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(27): 15226-15228. [LI Xiangting. Classification and evaluation of rural landscape: A case study in Wuchuanhu village of Changsha county, China [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(27): 15226-15228] DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2010.27.021
[73] 张益宾, 郝晋珉, 黄安, 等. 感知要素与遥感数据结合的乡村景观分类研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(16): 297-308. [ZHANG Yibin, HAO Jinmin, HUANG An, et al. Rural landscape classification based on combination of perception elements and remote sensing data [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(16): 297-308] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.16.033
[74] 周振宏, 王绘绘, 朱庆山, 等. 基于LCA与AVC的乡村景观特征识别与评价研究——以潜山市黄铺村为例[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(22): 4-8+35. [ZHOU Zhenhong, WANG Huihui, ZHU Qingshan, et al. Research on the identification and evaluation of rural landscape features based on LCA and AVC-taking Huangpu village in Qianshan city for example [J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 27(22): 4-8+35] DOI: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2021.22.002
[75] 胡最, 刘沛林, 邓运员, 等. 传统聚落景观基因的识别与提取方法研究[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(12): 1518-1524. [HU Zui, LIU Peilin, DENG Yunyuan, et al. A novel method for identifying and separating landscape genes from traditional settlements [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(12): 1518-1524] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.12.004
[76] 胡最. 传统聚落景观基因研究进展与展望[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2024, 40(4): 80-87. [HU Zui. Retrospects and outlooks on the research of cultural landscape gene of traditional settlements [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2024, 40(4): 80-87] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.16720504.2024.04.012
[77] 刘红梅, 廖邦洪. 国内外乡村聚落景观格局研究综述[J]. 现代城市研究, 2014, 29(11): 30-35+74. [LIU Hongmei, LIAO Banghong. Review of landscape pattern of rural settlements [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2014, 29(11): 30-35+74] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2014.11.007
[78] 刘滨谊, 王云才. 论中国乡村景观评价的理论基础与指标体系[J]. 中国园林, 2002, 18(5): 77-80. [LIU Binyi, WANG Yuncai. Theoretical base and evaluating indicator system of rural landscape assessment in China [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2002, 18(5): 77-80] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2002.05.023
[79] 谢花林, 刘黎明, 赵英伟. 乡村景观评价指标体系与评价方法研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2003, 24(2): 95-98. [XIE Hualin, LIU Liming, ZHAO Yingwei. Studies on the indicator system of rural landscape evaluation and evaluating method [J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2003, 24(2): 95-98] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0275.2003.02.004
[80] 李晓颖, 王志东. 乡村景观评价方法研究综述[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(25): 72-78. [LI Xiaoying, WANG Zhidong. Evaluation methods of rural landscape: A review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 72-78] DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0835
[81] 胡洁思, 张建国. 基于SBE和SD法的乡村滨水景观带美景度影响因素研究——以衢州庙源溪为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(22): 69-78. [HU Jiesi, ZHANG Jianguo. The influencing factors of scenic beauty of rural waterfront landscape belt based on SD-SBE method: A case study of Quzhou Miaoyuan River [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 69-78] DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2022.22.zgnxtb202222011
[82] 李宇奇, 何杰, 罗奕爽, 等. 乡村景观质量评价研究进展[J]. 四川林业科技, 2017, 38(4): 53-57. [LI Yuqi, HE Jie, LUO Yishuang, et al. Progress and prospects in researches on rural landscape quality assessment [J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 38(4): 53-57] DOI: 10.16779/j.cnki,1003-5508.2017.04.011
[83] 孙漪南, 赵芯, 王宇泓, 等. 基于VR全景图技术的乡村景观视觉评价偏好研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(12): 104-112. [SUN Yinan, ZHAO Xin, WANG Yuhong. Study on the visual evaluation preference of rural landscape based on VR panorama [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2016, 38(12): 104-112] DOI: 10.13332 /j.1000-1522.20160261
[84] 罗映舜, 沈守云, 詹文. 基于SD与眼动分析的张谷英村文化景观体验评价研究[J]. 中国园林, 2022, 38(5): 98-103. [LUO Yingshun, SHEN Shouyun, ZHAN Wen. Research on experience evaluation of cultural landscape of Zhang Guying Village based on SD and eye movement analysis [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2022, 38(5): 98-103] DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2022.05.0098
[85] 杨若琛, 苏畅, 赵建晔, 等. 国际化视野下的乡村景观感知——以日本冲绳恩纳村为例[J]. 风景园林, 2022, 29(9): 107-112. [YANG Ruochen, SU Chang, ZHAO Jianye, et al. Rural landscape perception from the perspective of internationalization: A case study of Onna Village, Okinawa, Japan [J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(9): 107-112] DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.09.0107.06
[86] 谈石柱, 黄莹莹, 郑叶静, 等. 基于居民感知的乡村景观价值空间特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(3): 207-216. [TAN Shizhu, HUANG Yingying, ZHEN Yejing, et al. Spatial characteristics analysis of rural landscape values based on residents' perceptions [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(3): 207-216] DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202110034
[87] 郭苏明, 冯美玲. 基于游客感知的乡村景观评价因子分析——以苏州市树山村为例[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(1): 253-258. [GUO Suming, FENG Meiling. Factor analysis of rural landscape evaluation based on the tourists' perception: A case study of the Shushan village in Suzhou [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2022, 37(1): 253-258] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2022.01.38
[88] 丁金华, 汪大庆. “三生”空间视角下苏南水网乡村景观生态风险评价——以石头潭片区为例[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2024, 39(2): 265-273. [DING Jinhua, WANG Daqing. Ecological risk assessment of rural landscape of southern Jiangsu water net from the perspective of “Ecology-Production-Living” space: A case study of Stone Pool area, China [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2024, 39(2): 265-273] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2024.02.33
[89] 李松睿, 曹迎. “乡村振兴”视角下生态宜居评价及其对农村经济转型发展的启发——以川西林盘四川都江堰精华灌区为例[J]. 农村经济, 2019(6): 66-74. [LI Songrui, CAO Ying. Evaluation of ecological livability from the perspective of “Rural Revitalization” and its inspiration for the transformational development of rural economy: A case study of the Jinghua irrigation district of Dujiangyan in Chuanxi Linpan, Sichuan, China [J]. Rural Economy, 2019(6): 66-74]
[90] 李泽, 吴博萌. 气候变化背景下乡村聚落生态韧性评价与空间分异研究[J]. 生态经济, 2023, 39(11): 110-118. [LI Ze, WU Bomeng. Evaluation and spatial differentiation of ecological resilience of rural settlements under climate change [J]. Ecological Economy, 2023, 39(11): 110-118]
[91] 须如怡, 丁金华. 基于VORC模型的水网乡村生态系统健康评价及管控策略——以吴江区为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2024(5): 129-136. [XU Ruyi, DING Jinhua. Ecosystem health assessment and control strategies of water network rural area based on VORC model: A case study of Wujiang District [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2024(5): 129-136] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2024.05.020
[92] 武俊喜, 程序, 焦加国, 等. 1940—2002年长江中下游平原乡村景观区域中耕地类型及其土壤氮磷储量的变化[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6309-6322. [WU Junxi, CHENG Xu, JIAO Jiaguo, et al. Long-term changes in area and soil total nitrogen and total phosphorus storage in croplands of the densely populated village landscapes of China's Yangtze Plain [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6309-6322] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.2010.23.001
[93] 武俊喜, 焦加国, 肖红生, 等. 长江平原区乡村景观的结构、管理及其对土壤氮磷的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3606-3617. [WU Junxi, JIAO Jiaguo, XIAO Hongsheng, et al. Landscape structure, management and soil total nitrogen, total phosphorus in the densely populated rural landscapes of China's Yangtze Plain [J]. Acta Ecica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 3606-3617] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.08.013
[94] 张保华, 张金萍, 肖燕, 等. 黄河下游沿岸县域农业景观格局演变的土壤养分效应——以河南省封丘县为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2008, 27(5): 116-119. [ZHANG Baohua, ZHANG Jinping, XIAO Yan, et al. Soil nutrient effects of agricultural landscape pattern change at county level along lower reaches of the Yellow River: A case study of Fengqiu county of Henan Province [J]. Areal Research and Development, 2008, 27(5): 116-119] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2008.05.024
[95] 王云, 周忠学, 郭钟哲. 都市农业景观破碎化过程对生态系统服务价值的影响——以西安市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(6): 1097-1105. [WANG Yun, ZHOU Zhongxue, GUO Zhongzhe. Impact of the urban agricultural landscape fragmentation on ecosystem services: A case study of Xi'an city [J]. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(6): 1097-1105] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201406010
[96] 陈思淇, 潘恺晨, 徐姝瑶, 等. 长三角地区乡村景观空间形态对植物多样性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(12): 1909-1920. [CHEN Siqi, PAN Kaichen, XU Shuyao, et al. Effects of rural landscape spatial morphology on plant diversity in the Yangtze River Delta region [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(12): 1909-1920] DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230360
[97] 卢训令, 刘俊玲, 丁圣彦. 农业景观异质性对生物多样性与生态系统服务的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13): 4602-4614. [LU Xunling, LIU Junling, DING Shengyan. Impact of agricultural landscape heterogeneity on biodiversity and ecosystem services [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(13): 4602-4614] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201806211354
[98] 郑淋峰, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. 丹江土石山区景观格局模拟与社会经济响应关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(1): 338-343. [ZHEN Linfeng, LI Zhanbin, LI Peng, et al. Relationship between landscape pattern simulation and social economic response in Danjiang Mountain area [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(1): 338-343] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2019.01.048
[99] 梁川, 杨福泉, 王建青, 等. 农业景观变化与少数民族地方制度建设——以云南西双版纳州纳版河地区为例[J]. 云南社会科学, 2012(3): 22-24+40. [LIANG Chuan, YANG Fuquan, WANG Jianqing. Agricultural landscape changes and institutional construction in ethnic minority areas: A case study of the Nabang River region in Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Yunnan [J]. Social Sciences in Yunnan, 2012(3): 22-24+40] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8691.2012.03.005
[100] 熊星, 唐晓岚, 刘澜, 等. 风景名胜区乡村文化景观管理数据库平台建构策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(5): 99-106. [XIONG Xing, TANG Xiaolan, LIU Lan, et al. Construction strategy of rural cultural landscape database management platform in scenic area [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(5): 99-106] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201607024
[101] 邓伟, 张少尧, 张昊, 等. 乡村振兴: 山村土地功能-景观结构与空间效应的探究[J]. 山地学报, 2024, 42(4): 431-441. [DENG Wei, ZHANG Shaoyao, ZHANG Hao, et al. Rural revitalization: An exploration of land function-landscape structure and spatial effects in mountainous villages [J]. Mountain Research, 2024, 42(4): 431-441] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000835

相似文献/References:

[1]刘 玉,唐林楠,任艳敏*,等.基于多维组合特征的北京密云区乡村休闲功能评价[J].山地学报,2020,(5):751.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000552]
 LIU Yu,TANG Linnan,REN Yanmin*,et al.Evaluation of Rural Leisure Functions Based on Multidimensional Combination of Characteristics in Miyun District of Beijing, China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(2):751.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000552]
[2]袁 野,杨雪婷,邱孝枰,等.“三区三州”乡村振兴的路径研究——以四川省甘孜藏族自治州为例[J].山地学报,2023,(2):254.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000746]
 YUAN Ye,YANG Xueting,QIU Xiaoping,et al.Development Path Research on Rural Revitalization in “Three Regions and Three Prefectures”: Taking Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan Province, China as An Example[J].Mountain Research,2023,(2):254.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000746]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2025- 01-24; 改回日期(Accepted date):2025- 04-24
基金项目(Foundation item):国家自然科学基金面上项目(42371275)。[General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(42371275)]
作者简介(Biography): 杜星宇(2000-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:乡土景观与乡村空间重构。[DU Xingyu(2000-), female, M.Sc. candidate, research on rural landscape and rural spatial reconstruction] E-mail: duxingyu202202@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 邓伟(1957-),男,博士,研究员,主要研究方向:山区资源环境与国土空间发展。[DENG Wei(1957-), male, Ph.D., professor, specialized in resources and environment research in mountainous areas and development of land and space] E-mail: dengwei@sicnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-30