[1]彭锦臣,叶长盛*,肖 蔚,等.武功山地质公园生态系统服务功能价值评估与分析[J].山地学报,2025,(3):393-407.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000900]
　PENG Jinchen,YE Changsheng*,XIAO Wei,et al.Assessment of EcosystemService Values in Wugongshan Geopark, China[J].Mountain Research,2025,(3):393-407.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000900]
点击复制

武功山地质公园生态系统服务功能价值评估与分析()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2025年第3期
页码:
393-407
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2025-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessment of EcosystemService Values in Wugongshan Geopark, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2025)3-393-15
作者:
彭锦臣; 叶长盛*; 肖 蔚; 蔡 鑫
(东华理工大学 地球科学学院, 南昌 330013)
Author(s):
PENG Jinchen;  YE Changsheng*;  XIAO Wei;  CAI Xin
(College of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)
关键词:
生态系统服务功能;  价值评估;  武功山地质公园
Keywords:
ecosystem service value(ESV);  value assessment;  Wugongshan Geopark
分类号:
F062.2
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000900
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
地质公园是以地质遗迹为核心载体,兼具科学价值、美学价值与生态价值的特殊地域综合体,需要开展全要素生态系统服务价值评估与范式构建。针对小尺度特殊地域空间(如保护区、国家公园、地质公园),生态系统服务价值(ESV, ecosystem service value)的量化评估体系,在地理数据与模型的适配性以及人文功能表达上存在技术缺陷,需要构建多源数据融合的精细化评估框架。本文以武功山地质公园为案例,基于CART(Classification and Regression Tree)决策树遥感解译的土地利用数据,结合RUSLE(Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation)和CASA(Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach)等生态学模型,构建30 m × 30 m 像元尺度的生态系统服务功能价值的估算体系,解析研究区生态系统服务的价值现状及空间分布特征。结果表明:(1)武功山地质公园作为典型复合生态系统,其ESV形成机制具五维特征,包括森林生态系统、草甸生态系统、地质景观系统、人文景观系统和农田生态系统。其中,森林生态系统贡献最为突出(占67.98%),其次为草甸生态系统(占19.14%),农田生态系统、地质景观系统和人文景观系统分别占2.68%、5.64%、4.56%。(2)武功山地质公园生态系统服务价值空间异质性显著,高值区集中于中南部草甸片区及中部的地质人文景点,其空间格局特征受旅游资源、人类活动及植被覆盖、地形、气候等自然因素共同驱动。(3)草甸生态系统单位面积服务价值最高(169.39万元/hm2),常绿阔叶林贡献率最大(41.42%),揭示了地质遗迹通过微地形塑造提升生态服务价值的机制,为高价值区保护提供依据。(4)武功山地质公园2020年生态系统服务功能总价值达175.61亿元,其中水源涵养(23.09%)、固碳释氧(18.97%)、土壤保持(16.86%)和美学游憩(18.81%)四项核心功能占比77.72%,在江西省生态安全格局中发挥着关键作用。研究结果可为地质公园的地质遗迹保护、生态功能优化和生态补偿提供参考依据。
Abstract:
Geoparks constitute unique territorial complexes centered on geoheritage assets with significant scientific, aesthetic, and ecological value, necessitating comprehensive ecosystem service value(ESV)assessment and methodological standardization. Current ESV quantification frameworks for small-scale protected areas(e.g., nature reserves, national parks, geoparks)exhibit technical limitations in geodata-model compatibility and cultural service representation, thereby demanding granular assessment frameworks with integrated multi-source data fusion.
In this study it established a 30 m × 30 m pixel-scale ESV estimation framework for Wugongshan Geopark by integrating CART decision tree-classified land-use data and ecological process models(Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, RUSLE; Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach, CASA), followed by comprehensive analysis of the status and spatial distribution patterns of ecosystem services of the Geopark.
(1)As a typical complex ecosystem, Wugongshan Geopark exhibited multidimensional ESV mechanisms across five subsystems: forest, meadow, geo-landscape, cultural landscape, and farmland ecosystems, of which forest ecosystems contributed most prominently(67.98%), followed by meadow ecosystems(19.14%). Farmland, geo-landscape, and cultural landscape system accounted for 2.68%, 5.64%, and 4.56% respectively.
(2)Wugongshan Geopark had spatial heterogeneity with high-value clusters concentrating in central-southern meadows and central geo-cultural attractions, jointly driven by tourism resources, human activities, and natural drivers(vegetation coverage, topography, climate).
(3)Meadow ecosystems yielded peak per-unit-area ESV(1.6939 million CNY/ha), while evergreen broadleaf forests contributed maximal proportion(41.42%), revealing how geological heritage enhanced ecological service value through microtopography shaping, providing a basis for high-value zone conservation.
(4)In 2020, the total ESV of Wugongshan Geopark reached 17.561 billion CNY, with its 77.2% from four core functions: water conservation(23.09%), carbon sequestration/oxygen release(18.97%), soil retention(16.86%), and aesthetic recreation accounting(18.81%), underscoring its critical role in Jiangxi Province's ecological security pattern.
These findings provide a scientific basis for geological heritage protection, ecological function optimization, and ecological compensation for geoparks.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张建平. 世界地质公园的前世今生[J]. 地质论评, 2020, 66(6): 1710-1718. [ZHANG Jianping. History of UNESCO Global Geopark [J]. Geological Review, 2020, 66(6): 1710-1718] DOI: 10.16509/j.georeview.2020.06.019
[2] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260. DOI: 10.1038/387253a0
[3] BOLUND P, HUNHAMMAR S. Ecosystem services in urban areas [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 293-301. DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00013-0
[4] REID W V, MOONEY H A, CROPPER A, et al. Millennium ecosystem assessment [G]// Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island Press, 2005: 1-137.
[5] HEIN L. Economic benefits generated by protected areas: The case of the Hoge Veluwe forest, the Netherlands [J]. Ecology & Society, 2011, 16(2): 13. DOI: 10.3354/meps09165
[6] NINAN K N, KONTOLEON A. Valuing forest ecosystem services and disservices: Case study of a protected area in India [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 20: 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.05.001
[7] 刘永杰, 王世畅, 彭皓, 等. 神农架自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(5): 1431-1438. [LIU Yongjie, WANG Shichang, PENG Hao, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem service values of the forests of Shennongjia nature reserve [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(5): 1431-1438] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2014.0023
[8] 王娇月, 邴龙飞, 尹岩, 等. 湿地生态系统服务功能及其价值核算——以福州市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3824-3834. [WANG Jiaoyue, BING Longfei, YIN Yan, et al. Wetland ecosystem service function and its value accounting: A case study of Fuzhou city, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3824-3834] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.017
[9] 缪建群, 王志强, 杨文亭, 等. 崇义客家梯田生态系统服务功能[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5): 1642-1652. [MIAO Jianqun, WANG Zhiqiang, YANG Wenting, el al. Ecosystem services of Chongyi Hakka Terraces [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(5): 1642-1652] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201705.015
[10] 普燕爽, 陈建军, 祖艳群, 等. 洱海流域不同种植模式稻田生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(5): 958-966. [PU Yanshuang, CHEN Jianjun, ZU Yanqun, et al. Evaluation of the service function value of rice field ecosystem with different planting patterns in Erhai Lake basin [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 39(5): 958-966] DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2021.0237
[11] 潘冬荣, 闫浩文, 韩天虎, 等. 基于当量因子法的甘肃省草原生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(9): 1860-1868. [PAN Dongrong, YAN Haowen, HAN Tianhu, et al. Evaluation of the service function value of grassland ecosystems in Gansu province using the equivalence factor method [J]. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(9): 1860-1868] DOI: 10.11829/i.issn.1001-0629.2021-0186
[12] XIE Gaodi, ZHEN Lin, LU Chunxia, et al. Applying value transfer method for eco-service valuation in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Eeology, 2010, 1(1): 51-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-764x.2010.01.007
[13] YIN Dengyu, LI Xiaoshun, LI Guie, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of land use transition and its eco-environmental effects: A case study of the Yellow River basin, China [J]. Land, 2020, 9(12): 514. DOI: 10.3390/land9120514
[14] 孙张涛, 余正伟, 舒思齐, 等. 北京延庆世界地质公园生态系统服务价值评价和生态地质调查工作建议[J]. 地质通报, 2023, 42(4): 657-667. [SUN Zhangtao, YU Zhengwei, SHU Siqi, et al. The evaluation of ecosystem service of Yanqing Global Geopark in Beijing and the suggestions for ecological geology [J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2023, 42(4): 657-667] DOI: 10.12097/i.issn.1671-2552.2023.04.014
[15] 脱登峰, 卢琦, 却晓娥, 等. 中国北方草地生态系统服务评估[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(2): 455-462. [TUO Dengfeng, LU Qi, QUE Xiaoe, et al. Evaluation of grassland ecosystem services in northern China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(2): 455-462] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202302260341
[16] 肖骁, 李京忠, 杨新军, 等. 黄河流域中上游林草生态调节服务功能价值核算[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(19): 7830-7844. [XIAO Xiao, LI Jingzhong, YANG Xinjun, et al. Evaluation of forest-grassland ecosystem services value in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin, China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(19): 7830-7844] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202002220305
[17] 王佳琪. 邢艳秋, 常晓晴, 等. 东北天然林资源保护工程成效评估及热点区域识别[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(3): 1231-1241. [WANG Jiaqi, XING Yanqiu, CHANG Xiaoqing, et al. Assessment of the effectiveness of the Northeast Natural Forest Protection Project and identification of hot spot areas [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(3): 1231-1241] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202303010375
[18] 冉璇, 李渊, 郭宇龙, 等. 基于InVEST模型的钱江源国家公园生态系统服务评估及权衡协同关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2023, 32(9): 1932-1948. [RAN Xuan, LI Yuan, GUO Yulong, et al. Ecosystem services assessment and trade-off synergy relationships in Qianjiangyuan National Park based on InVEST model [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2023, 32(9): 1932-1948] DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202309014
[19] 廖雨辰, 史雪威, 刘俊雁, 等. 九寨沟国家级自然保护区地震前后生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(6): 2063-2073. [LIAO Yuchen, SHI Xuewei, LIU Junyan, et al. Ecosystem service values assessment before and after earthquake in Jiuzhaigou National Nature Reserve [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(6): 2063-2073 ] DOI: 10.5846/stxb202102270547
[20] LY/T 1721-2008. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008. [LY/T 1721-2008. Specifications for assessment of forest ecosystem services in China [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008]
[21] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 贾良清, 等. 中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(6): 1101-1110. [ZHAO Tongqian, OUYANG Zhiyun, JIA Liangqing, et al. Ecosystem services and their valuation of China grassland [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(6): 1101-1110] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.06.002
[22] 胡晓燕, 于法稳, 徐湘博, 等. 农田生态系统服务价值核算:指标体系构建及应用研究[J]. 生态经济, 2023, 39(4): 111-121. [HU Xiaoyan, YU Fawen, XU Xiangbo, et al. Accounting of cropland ecosystem services: Indicator system construction and its application [J]. Ecological Economy, 2023, 39(4): 111-121]
[23] 李少宁. 江西省暨大岗山森林生态系统服务功能研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2007: 1-166. [LI Shaoning. Study on forest ecosystem services in Jiangxi province and Dagangshan [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2007: 1-166]
[24] 彭子恒, 王怀领, 王宇欣. 井冈山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能价值测度[J]. 林业经济问题, 2008, 28(6): 512-516. [PENG Ziheng, WANG Huailing, WANG Yuxin. The evaluation of forest ecosystem serices value in Jinggangshan National Nature Reserve [J]. 2008, 28(6): 512-516] DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2008.06.009
[25] 缪建群, 孙松, 王志强, 等. 江西高天岩自然保护区生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(19): 6422-6430. [MIAO Jianqun, SUN Song, WANG Zhiqiang, et al. Evaluating the ecosystem services of Gaotianyan Nature Reserve in Lianhua county, Jiangxi province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(19): 6422-6430] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201607091410
[26] 焦玉海, 王钰, 蔺皙. 全国森林面积2.08亿公顷森林覆盖率21.63%[N]. 中国绿色时报, 2014- 02-26(1). [JIAO Yuhai, WANG Yu, LIN Xi. National forest area amounts to 2.08 million hectares and the coverage rate of forest is of 21.63% [N]. Chinese Green Times, 2014- 02-26(1)]
[27] 袁知洋, 邓邦良, 郭晓敏, 等. 武功山山地草甸土壤全量氮磷钾分布格局及对不同退化程度的响应[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(3): 14-20. [YUAN Zhiyang, DENG Bangliang, GUO Xiaomin, et al. Soil total NPK's distribution pattern and response to different degradation degrees in Wugong Mountain meadow [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(3): 14-20] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.03.03
[28] 于徐根, 徐桂花, 戴征煌, 等. 江西省林草地牧草资源与生产力调查及评价[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(6): 1479-1489. [YU Xugen, XU Guihua, DAI Zhenghuang, et al. Forage resources and productivity of forest grassland in Jiangxi province [J]. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(6): 1479-1489] DOI: 10.11829/i.issn.1001-0629.2018-0427
[29] 郭然, 王效科, 逯非, 等. 中国草地土壤生态系统固碳现状和潜力[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(2): 862-867. [GUO Ran, WANG Xiaoke, LU Fei, et al. Soil carbon sequestration and its potential by grassland ecosystems in China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(2): 862-867] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.02.051
[30] 陈云, 戴锦芳, 李俊杰. 基于影像多种特征的CART决策树分类方法及其应用[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2008, 24(2): 33-36. [CHEN Yun, DAI Jinfang, LI Junjie. CART-based decision tree classifier using multi-feature of image and its application [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2008, 24(2): 33-36]
[31] 齐述华, 蒋梅鑫, 于秀波. 基于遥感和ULSE模型评价1995—2005年江西土壤侵蚀[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011, 31(7): 1197-1203. [QI Shuhua, JIANG Meixin, YU Xiubo. Evaluating soil erosion in Jiangxi province with USLE model and remote sensing technology during 1995-2005 [J]. China Environmental Science, 2011, 31(7): 1197-1203]
[32] WILLIAMS J R, RENARD K G, DYKE P T. EPIC: A new method for assessing erosion's effect on soil productivity[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1983, 38(5): 381. DOI:10.1016/0016-7061(83)90021-6
[33] 蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华, 等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(2): 19-24. [CAI Chongfa, DING Shuwen, SHI Zhihua, et al. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14(2): 19-24] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2000.02.005
[34] 陈思旭, 杨小唤, 肖林林, 等. 基于RUSLE模型的南方丘陵山区土壤侵蚀研究[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(6): 1288-1297. [CHEN Sixu, YANG Xiaohuan, XIAO Linlin, et al. Study of soil erosion in the southern hillside area of China based on RUSLE model [J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(6): 1288-1297]
[35] TIAN Pei, ZHU Zhanliang, YUE Qimeng, et al. Soil erosion assessment by RUSLE with improved P factor and its validation: Case study on mountainous and hilly areas of Hubei province, China [J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2021, 9(3): 433-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.04.007
[36] 朱文泉, 潘耀忠, 张锦水. 中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 413-424. [ZHU Wenquan, PAN Yaozhong, ZHANG Jinshui. Estimation of net primayr productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remote sensing [J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 413-424] DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0050
[37] EADE J D O, MORAN D. Spatial economic valuation: Benefits transfer using geographical information systems [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1996, 48(2): 97-110. DOI: 10.1006/jema.1996.9990
[38] 李达立. 基于两步路平台的武功山旅游者时空行为研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2018: 1-65. [LI Dali. The research on Wugong Mountain tourists' spatiotemporal behavior based on two-step platform [D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry Technology, 2018: 1-65]
[39] 李永涛, 杜振宇, 王霞, 等. 黄河三角洲自然保护区湿地生态服务功能价值评估[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2019, 38(5): 761-768. [LI Yongtao, DU Zhenyu, WANG Xia, et al. Evaluation of wetland ecosystem services in Yellow River Delta Nature Reserve [J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2019, 38(5): 761-768] DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes.2019.05.017
[40] 赵欣, 张杰, 钟林东. 黑龙江丰林国家级自然保护区生态系统服务价值评估与分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(7): 100-110. [ZHAO Xin, ZHANG Jie, ZHONG Lindong. Evaluation and analysis on ecosystem service value of Fenglin National Nature Reserve in Heilongjiang province of northeastern China [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43(7): 100-110] DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210041

相似文献/References:

[1]陈明丽,黄成敏*,张 勇.泥石流综合防治工程构建旅游品牌的优势分析与价值评估:以新疆天山天池风景区为例[J].山地学报,2019,(6):891.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000479]
　CHEN Mingli,HUANG Chengmin*,Zhang Yong.Strengthens and Valuation of Tourism Brand Dependent on Comprehensive Engineering for Debris Flow Prevention: A Case Study of Tianshan Tianchi National Park, Xinjiang, China[J].Mountain Research,2019,(3):891.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000479]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2025- 01-12; 改回日期(Accepted date):2025- 05- 04
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家自然科学基金(42061041)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(42061041)]
作者简介(Biography): 彭锦臣(1998-),男,江西萍乡人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:区域发展与土地利用。[PENG Jinchen(1998-), male, born in Pingxiang, Jiangxi Province, M.Sc. candidate, research on regional development and land use] E-mail: 869394757@qq.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 叶长盛(1977-),男,博士,教授,主要研究方向:城市发展、土地资源利用与保护。[YE Changsheng(1977-), male, Ph.D., professor, research on urban development, land resource utilization and protection] E-mail: ycs519@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-30