[1]张 旺,彭佳迪.山地县域村镇空间扩展适宜性评价与土地利用冲突识别——以邵阳市绥宁县为例[J].山地学报,2025,(5):737-748.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000926]
　ZHANG Wang,PENG Jiadi.Suitability Evaluation of Town-Village Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land-Use Conflict in Mountainous County: A Case Study of Suining County, Shaoyang City, China[J].Mountain Research,2025,(5):737-748.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000926]
点击复制

山地县域村镇空间扩展适宜性评价与土地利用冲突识别——以邵阳市绥宁县为例()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2025年第5期
页码:
737-748
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2025-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Suitability Evaluation of Town-Village Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land-Use Conflict in Mountainous County: A Case Study of Suining County, Shaoyang City, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2025)5-737-12
作者:
张 旺1; 彭佳迪2
(1.湖南工业大学 土木与环境工程学院,湖南 株洲 412007; 2.湖南有色金属职业技术学院 冶金材料系,湖南 株洲 412006)
Author(s):
ZHANG Wang1;  PENG Jiadi2
(1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, Hunan, China; 2. Department of Metallurgical Materials, Hunan Nonferrous Metals Vocational and Technical College, Zhuzhou 412006, Hunan, China)
关键词:
山地;  村镇空间扩展;  适宜性评价;  土地利用冲突;  绥宁县
Keywords:
mountain;  town-village spatial expansion;  suitability evaluation;  land-use conflict;  Suining County
分类号:
F301.2
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000926
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
山地县域村镇空间是农宅与公共服务设施落地的主要载体,也是国土空间规划与乡村振兴的基础单元。既有研究对山地县域村镇空间扩展适宜性及土地利用冲突关注不足,实证指导性低。本文以湖南省邵阳市绥宁县为例,构建“自然-人文”双维度村镇空间扩展适宜性指标体系,量化建设、农业、生态三类用地的倾向强度并划分高-中-低三档,建立土地利用冲突识别矩阵,形成冲突分区成果。结果发现:(1)绥宁县村镇空间扩展适宜性空间分异显著,极值相差5.84倍,等级梯度清晰;(2)扩展空间以“较不适宜”(28.52%)与“基本适宜”(30.44%)为主,二者合计近59%,“最适宜”区仅占5.06%,呈现“适宜面积小、差异大”的山地典型特征;(3)生态用地优势区中-高度倾向性占比达75.52%,且呈分散分布,生态保护压力突出;(4)潜在土地利用冲突区(冲突一般+冲突激烈)占县域49.46%,其中冲突一般区面积最大(49.45%),村镇-农业、生态-农业激烈冲突区面积最小(0.01%),风险总体可控但需重点监管。本研究通过协调土地开发、利用与保护的关系,可以山地县域国土空间规划编制提供可操作的技术路径,对促进乡村高质量振兴具有实践指导价值。
Abstract:
Rural settlement space in mountainous county serves as the primary carrier for placing rural residences and public service facilities, and constitutes a fundamental unit for territorial spatial planning and rural revitalization. Existing studies inadequately address the suitability of rural settlement expansion and land use conflicts in such regions, lacking empirical guidance.
In this study, it took Suining County, Shaoyang City, Hunan Province, China as a case study. It constructed a natural-humanistic dual-dimensional suitability assessment framework for rural settlement expansion, quantify the development propensity intensity of construction, agricultural, and ecological land(categorized into high, medium, and low tiers via natural breaks classification), establish a land use conflict identification matrix, and generate conflict zoning outcomes.
(1)Key findings reveal there was significant spatial differentiation of settlement expansion suitability in Suining County(extreme values differ by 5.84 times), with clear hierarchical gradation.
(2)The expansion space was primarily composed of relatively unsuitable(28.52%)and basically suitable(30.44%)land, accounting for nearly 59% in total, while the most suitable land only accounts for 5.06%, presenting typical mountainous characteristics featured by small suitable area and large differences.
(3)The proportion of medium-to-high propensity in ecology-dominance-land reached 75.52%, with a dispersed distribution, highlighting significant ecological protection pressures.
(4)Potential land use conflict areas(general conflict + intense conflict)accounted for 49.46% of the county, with general conflict zones occupying the largest area(49.45%), and intense conflict zones merely taking the smallest areas(0.01% total), occurring at town-village land vs. agriculture land, ecology land vs. agriculture land. Therefore, the overall risk is controllable but requires focused supervision.
By coordinating the relationships between land development, utilization, and protection, this study provides an operable technical pathway for the compilation of national spatial planning in mountainous counties and offers practical guidance for promoting high-quality rural revitalization.

参考文献/References:

[1] 罗松开, 罗志军, 杨晓芳, 等. 建设用地扩张影响下南昌市生态系统服务变化及公平性识别[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(7): 4641-4656. [LUO Songkai, LUO Zhijun, YANG Xiaofang, et al. Changes in ecosystem services and equity identification in Nanchang under the influence of construction land expansion [J]. Environmental Science, 2025, 46(7): 4641-4656] DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202407031
[2] 丛佳敏, 孙从建, 陈伟, 等. 2000—2020年间黄河中游不同地貌区城镇建设用地扩张过程及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2024, 43(8): 2121-2140. [CONG Jiamin, SUN Congjian, CHEN Wei, et al. Unrevealing the process and driving factors of urban construction land expansion in the middle reaches of the Yellow River, 2000-2020 [J]. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(8): 2121-2140] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020240043
[3] 张祚, 江驭鲲, 何青松, 等. 城乡融合背景下村镇建设用地“扩张—消失”多情景模拟——以洛阳市为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2024, 38(7): 96-108. [ZHANG Zuo, JIANG Yukun, HE Qingsong, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of “expansion-disappearance” of village and town construction land in the context of urban-rural integration—a case study of Luoyang City [J]. China Land Science, 2024, 38(7): 96-108] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20240710.170115
[4] WESTMAN W E. Ecological impact assessment and environmental planning [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985: 29-32.
[5] MILLER W, COLLINS M G, STEINER F R, et al. An approach for greenway suitability analysis [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 42(2/4): 91-105. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00080-2
[6] UY P D, NAKAGOSHI N. Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban green space planning in Hanoi,Vietnam [J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2008, 7(1): 25-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.09.002
[7] 刘玉安, 张旺, 蒋沙沙. 丘岗区县域村镇空间扩展适宜性评价及空间冲突分析——以株洲市渌口区为例[J]. 小城镇建设, 2022, 40(9): 38-45. [LIU Yu'an, ZHANG Wang, JIANG Shasha. Spatial expansion suitability evaluation and spatial conflicts analysis of villages and towns in hilly regions: Taking Lukou District of Zhuzhou City as an example [J]. Development of Small Cities & Towns, 2022, 40(9): 38-45] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2022.09.006
[8] 苏文学. 基于GIS空间分析法的西南山区城镇建设用地适宜性评价———以盘州市为例[J]. 绿色科技, 2024, 26(7): 221-225. [SU Wenxue. Suitability evaluation of urban construction land in southwestern mountainous areas based on GIS spatial analysis method: A case study of Panzhou City [J]. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2024, 26(7): 221-225] DOI: 10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2024.07.023
[9] 杨华, 徐勇, 王丽佳. 青藏高原高山峡谷区建设用地和耕地适宜性评价方法及应用——以林芝市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(5): 1283-1299. [YANG Hua, XU Yong, WANG Lijia. Evaluation method and empirical application of construction land suitability and arable land suitability in alpine-gorge region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A case study of Nyingchi City [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(5): 1283-1299] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230511
[10] 曾爽, 王成霞. 基于GIS的建设用地适宜性评价——以成都市中心五城区[J]. 价值工程, 2023, 42(1): 13-15. [ZENG Shuang, WANG Chengxia. GIS-based construction land suitability evaluation: Taking the five urban areas in the center of Chengdu as an example [J]. Value Engineering, 2023, 42(1): 13-15] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4311.2023.01.005
[11] 谭欣, 杨晓青, 黄大全, 等. 沈阳经济区建设用地开发适宜性评价[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 53(5): 559-566. [TAN Xin, YANG Xiaoqing, HUANG Daquan, et al. Suitability evaluation on constructive lands in Shengyang metropolitan area [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science), 2017, 53(5): 559-566] DOI: 10.16360/j.cnki.jbnuns.2017.05.010
[12] 程文仕, 王天明, 徐宁, 等. 基于加权Voronoi图的农村居民点用地适宜性评价及分区管控[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2024(2): 36-67. [CHENG Wenshi, WANG Tianming, XU Ning, et al. A study on suitability evaluation of rural residential areas and zoning control based on weighted Voronoi diagram [J]. Territory & Natural Resources Study, 2024(2): 36-67] DOI: 10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2024.02.013
[13] 李林芝, 陈星宇, 张虹, 等. 基于随机森林算法的农村居民点用地适宜性评价——以重庆市合川区为例[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 39(3): 93-104. [LI Linzhi, CHEN Xingyu, ZHANG Hong, et al. Evaluation of suitability of rural residential land use based on random forest algorithm:Take Hechuan District, Chongqing City as an example [J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University(Natural Science), 2022, 39(3): 93-104] DOI: 10.11721/cqnuj20220317
[14] 徐枫, 王占岐, 张红伟, 等. 随机森林算法在农村居民点适宜性评价中的应用[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(10): 2085-2098. [XU Feng, WANG Zhanqi, ZHANG Hongwei, et al. Application of random forest algorithm in suitability evaluation of rural residential land [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(10): 2085-2098] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2018.10.16
[15] 汤昪, 于婧, 陈艳红, 等. 乡村振兴背景下农村居民点用地适宜性评价——以慈利县为例[J]. 湖北大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 531-538. [TANG Bian, YU Jing, CHEN Yanhong, et al. Suitability evaluation of rural residential land under the background of rural revitalization: A case study of Cili County [J]. Journal of Hubei University(Natural Science), 2020, 42(5): 531-538] DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2375.2020.05.010
[16] BROWN G, RAYMOND C M. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 12(2): 196-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007
[17] PAVON D, VENTURA M, RIBAS A, et al. Land use change and socio-environmental conflict in the Alt Empordà County(Catalonia, Spain)[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2003, 54(3): 543-552. DOI: 10.1006/jare.2002.1077
[18] IOJA C I, NIŢA M R, VANAU G O, et al. Using multi-criteria analysis for the identification of spatial land-use conflicts in the Bucharest Metropolitan area [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 42: 112-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.029
[19] ADAM Y O, PRETZSCH J, DARR D. Land use conflicts in central Sudan: Perception and local coping mechanisms [J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42: 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.006
[20] DELGADO-MATAS C, MOLA-YUDEGO B, GRITTEN D, et al. Land use evolution and management under recurrent conflict conditions: Umbundu agroforestry system in the Angolan Highlands [J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42: 460-470. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.018
[21] 方晓倩, 曹宇, 程诺, 等. 土地利用功能性冲突内涵解析、理论基础与研究框架[J]. 农业工程学报, 2025, 41(6): 1-8. [FANG Xiaoqian, CAO Yu, CHENG Nuo, et al. Connotation analysis, theoretical foundation, and research framework of land use functional conflicts [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2025, 41(6): 1-8] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202412016
[22] 阮松涛, 吴克宁. 城镇化进程中土地利用冲突及其缓解机制研究[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2013, 23(11): 388-392. [RUAN Songtao, WU Kening. Research of the land use conflict and mitigation mechanism during the urbanization in China [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(11): 388-392]
[23] 周泽, 全斌, 张海波. 土地利用冲突特征识别及驱动力分析——以滇中城市群为例[J]. 山地学报, 2024, 42(2): 210-224. [ZHOU Ze, QUAN Bin, ZHANG Haibo. Identification of land use conflict characteristics and analysis of driving forces: Taking the central Yunnan urban agglomeration as an example [J]. Mountain Research, 2024, 42(2): 210-224]DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000817
[24] 廖超明, 韦媛媛, 唐丹, 等. 喀斯特地区土地利用冲突识别与影响机制[J]. 水土保持研究, 2025, 32(1): 358-367. [LIAO Chaoming, WEI Yuanyuan, TANG Dan, et al. Identification and mechanism of land use conflict in karst area [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2025, 32(1): 358-367] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.01.028
[25] 李益敏, 邓选伦, 杨一铭, 等. 基于GIS的怒江州建设用地生态适宜性评价[J]. 地理空间信息, 2023, 21(9): 27-30. [LI Yimin, DENG Xuanlun, YANG Yiming, et al. Ecological suitability evaluation of construction land in Nujiang Prefecture based on GIS [J]. Geosptial Information, 2023, 21(9): 27-30] DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2023.09.007
[26] 王玮玮, 郭小彦. 基于GIS多因子空间叠加法的土地适宜性评价及空间优化研究[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2025, 48(6): 148-153. [WANG Weiwei, GUO Xiaoyan. Research on land suitability evaluation and spatial optimization based on GIS multi-factor spatial overlay method [J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2025, 48(6): 148-153]
[27] 赵润哲, 苏维, 李彦克. 基于最小累计阻力模型的卢氏县土地生态适宜性评价[J]. 林业调查规划, 2024, 49(2): 90-96. [ZHAO Runzhe, SU Wei, LI Yanke. Evaluation of land ecological suitability in Lushi County based on minimum cumulative resistance model [J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2024, 49(2): 90-96] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2024.02.015
[28] 李潇, 吴克宁, 刘亚男, 等. 基于土地类型的西峡县农用地适宜性评价[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2024, 45(1): 45-56. [LI Xiao, WU Kening, LIU Yanan, et al. Suitability evaluation of agricultural land based on land type in the Xixia Country [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2024, 45(1): 45-56] DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20240105
[29] 况依兰, 许德合, 曹连海, 等. 混合权重法在城市建设用地适宜性评价中的应用: 以郑州市为例[J]. 北京测绘, 2025, 39(3): 383-390. [KUANG Yilan, XU Dehe, CAO Lianhai, et al. Application of mixed weight method in suitability evaluation of urban construction land: A case study of Zhengzhou City [J]. Beijing Surveying and Mapping, 2025, 39(3): 383-390] DOI: 10.19580/j.cnki.1007-3000.2025.03.023
[30] 王玉国, 尹小玲, 李贵才. 基于土地生态适宜性评价的城市空间增长边界划定——以深汕特别合作区为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2012, 19(11): 76-82. [WANG Yuguo, YIN Xiaoling, LI Guicai. Delimitation of urban growth boundary based on land ecological suitability evaluation: A case of Shenshan special corporation zone [J]. Urban Studies, 2012, 19(11): 76-82]
[31] CARR M H,ZWICK P. Using GIS suitability analysis to identify potential future land use conflicts in North Central Florida [J]. Journal of Conservation Planning, 2005, 1(1): 89-105.
[32] 李宇航, 叶长盛. 基于FLUS模型的松潘城镇建设适宜性评价优化研究[J]. 地理空间信息, 2025, 23(3): 46-50. [LI Yuhang, YE Changsheng. Optimization research on construction suitability evaluation of Songpan County based on FLUS model [J]. Geospatial Information, 2025, 23(3): 46-50] DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2025.03.011
[33] 谢爱萍, 陈玉玲. 陇中黄土丘陵区县域村落居住适宜性评价及优化发展布局: 以甘谷县为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2026, 33(2): 1-10. [XIE Aiping, CHEN Yuling. Livability evaluation and development layout optimization for county-level villages in loess hilly region of central Gansu Province: A case study of Gangu County [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026, 33(2): 1-10] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2026.02.034
[34] 余洪, 徐艺菡. 湖区平原县域村镇空间扩展适宜性评价及功能分区分析——基于益阳市南县“三大空间”的视角[J]. 城市学刊, 2023, 44(4): 1-9. [YU Hong, XU Yihan. Suitability evaluation and functional zoning analysis of spatial expansion of villages and towns in plain counties of lake district: From the perspective of“Three Spaces”in Nanxian County [J]. Journal of Urban Studies, 2023, 44(4): 1-9] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-059X.2023.04.001
[35] 史宇微. 山地丘陵区土地利用冲突识别与优化协调研究——以重庆市江津区为例[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2022: 1-78. [SHI Yuwei. Identification of land use conflict and its coordination strategies in hilly mountains region: A case study of Jiangjin District, Chongqing [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2022: 1-78.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪学军.九华山山地雾形成的气象条件及地形影响[J].山地学报,2013,(01):39.
　JiuhuaWANG Xuejun.Meteorological Conditions and Terrain Effect the Formation of Mountain Fog in Mount[J].Mountain Research,2013,(5):39.
[2]邓伟,熊永兰,赵纪东,等.国际山地研究计划的启示[J].山地学报,2013,(03):377.
　DENG Wei,XIONG Yunlan,ZHAO Jidong,et al.Enlightenment from International Mountain Research Projects[J].Mountain Research,2013,(5):377.
[3]吴良镛.简论山地人居环境科学的发展——“第三届山地人居科学国际论坛”特约报告[J].山地学报,2012,(04):385.
　WU Liangyong.Brief Discussion on the Developmcnt of Mountain Habitet Environmental Science——An Invited Report of the Third Mountain Habitat Science Internetional Forum[J].Mountain Research,2012,(5):385.
[4]田千禧.山地制度建设试验与思考[J].山地学报,1993,(03):129.
[5]骆高远,胡云好.利用山地凉夏水热资源发展城市淡季蔬菜[J].山地学报,1995,(03):172.
[6]刘红,李瑞波,袁兴中.我国山地生物多样性初探[J].山地学报,1996,(01):3.
[7]李植斌.一种山地可持续利用评价方法[J].山地学报,1999,(01):68.
[8]洪伟,吴承祯.山地土地利用方向的自组织学习联想神经树判别[J].山地学报,2000,(06):554.
[9]邱荣祖.山地林道网对林地环境的影响[J].山地学报,2001,(01):38.
[10]苏明武.长江上游山地开发及治理[J].山地学报,2001,(S1):123.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2022- 03-23; 改回日期(Accepted date):2025- 04-18
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家重点研发计划课题(18YFD1100804)。[National Key Research and Development Program Sub(18YFD1100804)]
作者简介(Biography): 张旺(1974-),男,湖南汨罗人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向:城乡规划与发展。[ZHANG Wang(1974-),male,born in Miluo, Hunan Province, Ph.D.,associate professor, research on planning and development in urban and rural areas] E-mail: zhangwang0902@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-10-20