[1]邓 伟,等.乡村振兴:山村土地功能-景观结构与空间效应的探究[J].山地学报,2024,(4):431-441.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000835]
　DENG Wei,ZHANG Shaoyao,ZHANG Hao,et al.Rural Revitalization: An Exploration of Land Function-Landscape Structure and Spatial Effects in Mountainous Villages[J].Mountain Research,2024,(4):431-441.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000835]
点击复制

乡村振兴:山村土地功能-景观结构与空间效应的探究
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第4期
页码:
431-441
栏目:
专家观点
出版日期:
2024-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Rural Revitalization: An Exploration of Land Function-Landscape Structure and Spatial Effects in Mountainous Villages
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)4-431-11
作者:
邓 伟1;  2; 张少尧1;  张 昊1; 杜星宇1; 王占韵2;  苑全治1
(1.四川师范大学 地理与资源科学学院,成都 610101; 2.中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都 610299)
Author(s):
DENG Wei1; 2;  ZHANG Shaoyao1;  ZHANG Hao1;  DU Xingyu1; WANG Zhanyun2;  YUAN Quanzhi1
(1. School of Geography and Resource Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China; 2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Chengdu 610299, China)
关键词:
乡村振兴;  土地功能;  乡村景观;  空间效率;  山区
Keywords:
rural revitalization;  land function;  rural landscape;  spatial efficiency;  mountainous area
分类号:
K928.5
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000835
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
山地是中国地理国情的基本底色,塑造了国土空间的多样性与差异性。在乡村振兴战略的推进中,复杂性和艰巨性主要凸显于广袤山区,这亦是国家全面现代化建设进程中必然直面的挑战。要有效实现乡村振兴的阶段性和总体目标,不仅需要宏观层面的战略规划,还需要深入到区域、县域和镇域不同尺度,细致考察村庄类别和功能差异,特别是中西部山区的乡村振兴所面临的特殊困难。山区的土地多功能性表现了地形梯度下人文与自然复合体的多样化特征,深入研究山区村域单位的土地功能与景观结构,以及村庄群落的土地功能与景观结构,对于理解山村业态的发展和空间效率至关重要。本文采用乡村地理学、土地科学和社会学的交叉学科视角,识别和解析村域土地功能与景观耦合的协调机制,科学评估县域土地功能与景观的级联效应,探索提升其空间效率的有效路径。研究成果为揭示中西部山区山村振兴的内在逻辑提供切实可行的策略建议。
Abstract:
Mountainous regions constitute the elements of China's geographical context, shaping the diversity and disparities of its territorial spaces. In the advancement of the rural revitalization strategy in China, the complexity and arduousness are primarily manifested in the vast mountainous areas, posing inevitable challenges for the country's comprehensive modernization process. To effectively achieve the phased and overall goals of rural revitalization, it is necessary not only to have strategic planning at the macro level but also to delve into the regional, county, and township scales, meticulously examining the categories and functional differences among villages, particularly the unique difficulties faced by rural revitalization in mountainous areas of central and western China. The multifunctionality of land in mountainous regions exemplifies the diversified characteristics of the human-nature complex under topographic gradients. An in-depth study of the land functions and landscape structures of rural units and village communities in mountainous areas is crucial for understanding the development of rural industries and spatial efficiency.
This paper adopted an interdisciplinary perspective combining rural geography, land science, and sociology, to identify and analyze the coordination mechanisms of land function and landscape coupling within rural areas. The research findings would be providing practical strategic suggestions for revealing the internal logic of rural revitalization in mountainous areas of central and western China.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邓伟, 张少尧, 王占韵, 等. 乡村振兴: 山村发展路径与模式的科学探究[J]. 山地学报, 2022, 40(6): 791-800. [DENG Wei, ZHANG Shaoyao, WANG Zhanyun, et al. Types, rural revitalization in China: Scientific inquiry into the development path and mode of mountain villages [J]. Mountain Research, 2022, 40(6): 791-800] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000713
[2] 龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309. [LONG Hualou, CHEN Kunqiu. Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 295-309] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
[3] 高阳, 吴浩, 李鑫, 等. 国家自然科学基金“土地科学和自然资源管理”申请代码领域研究格局、热点透视与发展展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(12): 3049-3059. [GAO Yang, WU Hao, LI Xin, et al. Research patterns, hotspots and development prospects of land resource and natural resource management field within the National Natural Science Foundation of China [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(12): 3049-3059] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20221202
[4] 冯健.乡村重构——模式与创新[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012: 189-203. [FENG Jian. Rural reconstruction: Model and innovation [M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2012: 189-203]
[5] TURNER II B L. Sustainability and forest transitions in the southern Yucatan: The land architecture approach [J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(2): 170-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.03.006
[6] LI Weimin, MILBURN L A. The evolution of geodesign as a design and planning tool [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning [J], 2016, 156: 5-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.009
[7] TURNER II B L. Land system architecture for urban sustainability: New directions for land system science illustrated by application to the urban heat island problem [J]. Journal of Land Use Science, 2016, 11(6): 689-697. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2016.1241315
[8] 傅伯杰. 地理学综合研究的途径与方法: 格局与过程耦合[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1052-1059. [FU Bojie. The integrated studies of geography: Coupling of patterns and processes [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1052-1059] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201408002
[9] 傅伯杰. 联合国可持续发展目标与地理科学的历史任务[J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38(13): 19-24. [FU Bojie. UN sustainable development goals and historical mission of geography [J]. Science & Technology Review, 2020, 38(13): 19-24] DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.10007857.2020.13.002
[10] GAO Lei, BRYAN B A. Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability [J]. Nature, 2017, 544(7649): 217-222. DOI: 10.1038/nature21694
[11] VERBURG P H, CROSSMAN N, ELLIS E C, et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: A global land project perspective [J]. Anthropocene, 2015, 12: 29-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ancene.2015.09.004
[12] BRONDIZIO E S, EOSTROM O, YOUNG O R. Connectivity and the governance of multilevel socio-ecological systems: The role of social capital [J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2009, 34(1): 253-278. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.020708.100707
[13] 李明珍, 李阳兵, 冉彩虹. 土地利用转型背景下的乡村景观格局演变响应——基于草堂溪流域的样带分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2283-2298. [LI Mingzhen, LI Yangbing, RAN Caihong. Evolution of rural landscape pattern under the background of land use transformation: Based on the transect analysis of Caotangxi watershed [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(9): 2283-2298] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200919
[14] 梁鑫源, 李阳兵. 三峡库区“耕—果”转换时空变化特征及其启示——以草堂溪流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 385-399. [LIANG Xinyuan, LI Yangbing. Spatio-temporal variation of farmland-fruit forest conversion and its enlightenment in Three Gorges Reservoir area: A case study on Caotangxi watershed [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(2): 385-399] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190214
[15] 温玉玲, 李红波, 张小林, 等. 近30年来鄱阳湖环湖区土地利用与景观格局变化研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(7): 501-510. [WEN Yuling, LI Hongbo, ZHANG Xiaolin, et al. Changes of land use and landscape pattern in the peripheral region of Poyang Lake in recent 30 years [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2022, 42(7): 501-510] DOI: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2021.0537
[16] 张建, 雷刚, 漆良华, 等. 2003—2018年土地利用变化对丹江口市景观格局与生态服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(4): 1280-1290. [ZHANG Jian, LEI Gang, QI Lianghua, et al. The landscape pattern and ecological service value in Danjiangkou City under land use change from 2003 to 2018 [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(4): 1280-1290] DOI: 10.5846/stxb201912022609
[17] 李伯华, 周璐, 窦银娣, 等. 基于乡村多功能理论的少数民族传统聚落景观风貌演化特征及影响机制研究——以湖南怀化皇都村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(8): 1433-1445. [LI Bohua, ZHOU Lu, DOU Yindi, et al. Evolution characteristics and influence mechanism of ethnic traditional settlement landscape based on rural multifunctional theory: A case study of Huangdu Village in Huaihua City, Hunan [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(8): 1433-1445] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.08.011
[18] 蒙吉军, 王祺, 李枫, 等. 基于空间差异的黑河中游土地多功能利用研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 369-382. [MENG Jijun, WANG Qi, LI Feng, et al. Assessing multifunctional land use in the middle reach of the Heihe River basin based on spatial variances [J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(2): 369-382] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020171014
[19] VIGL L E, SCHIRPKE U, TASSER E, et al. Linking long-term landscape dynamics to the multiple interactions among ecosystem services in the European Alps [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31: 1903-1918. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-016-0389-3
[20] SCHIRPKE U, ALTZINGER A, LEITINGER G, et al. Change from agricultural to touristic use: Effects on the aesthetic value of landscapes over the last 150 years [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 187: 23-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.004
[21] 邓伟, 张少尧, 张昊, 等. 人文自然耦合视角下过渡性地理空间概念、内涵与属性和研究框架[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 761-771. [DENG Wei, ZHANG Shaoyao, ZHANG Hao, et al. Transitional geospace from the perspective of human-nature coupling: Concept, connotations, attributes, and the research framework [J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(4): 761-771] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020200189
[22] 张少尧, 邓伟, 胡茂桂, 等. 山区过渡性地理空间人文自然交互性识别与分异解析[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(5): 1225-1243. [ZHANG Shaoyao, DENG Wei, HU Maogui, et al. Identification and differentiation of human-nature interaction in mountainous transitional geospace of China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(5): 1225-1243] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202205013
[23] 王占韵, 邓伟, 张少尧, 等. 山区土地多功能性与过渡性地理空间关联分析——以长宁县为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(6): 1091-1101. [WANG Zhanyun, DENG Wei, ZHANG Shaoyao, et al. Correlation analysis of land use multi-functionalization and transitional geo-space in mountainous areas: Taking Changning County as an example [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(6): 1091-1101] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.06.015
[24] 刘彦随. 中国乡村振兴规划的基础理论与方法论[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1120-1133. [LIU Yansui. The basic theory and methodology of rural revitalization planning in China [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1120-1133] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202006002
[25] 龙花楼, 张英男, 屠爽爽. 论土地整治与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849. [LONG Hualou, ZHANG Yingnan, TU Shuangshuang. Land consolidation and rural vitalization [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201810002
[26] 李伯华, 曾灿, 窦银娣, 等. 基于“三生”空间的传统村落人居环境演变及驱动机制——以湖南江永县兰溪村为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 677-687. [LI Bohua, ZENG Can, DOU Yindi, et al. Change of human settlement environment and driving mechanism in traditional villages based on living-production-ecological space: A case study of Lanxi Village, Jiangyong County, Hunan Province [J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 677-687] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.05.011
[27] 樊杰. 中国空间治理体系现代化在“十九大”后的新态势[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(4): 396-404. [FAN Jie. Perspective of China's spatial governance system after 19th CPC National Congress [J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(4): 396-404] DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2017.04.010
[28] 邓伟, 戴尔阜, 贾仰文, 等. 山地水土要素时空耦合特征、效应及其调控[J]. 山地学报, 2015, 33(5): 513-520. [DENG Wei, DAI Erfu, JIA Yangwen, et al. Spatiotemporal coupling characteristics, effects and their regulation of water and soil elements in mountainous area [J]. Mountain Research, 2015, 33(5): 513-520] DOI: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000064
[29] 石鼎. 从“农业专用地区”到“故乡村”——日本神奈川县横滨市乡村景观保护实践解读[J].自然与文化遗产研究, 2023, 8(1): 81-93. [SHI Ding. From “Agricultural Zones” to “Furusatomura Village”: Interpretation of rural landscape conservation practices in Yokohama City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan [J]. Study on Natural and Cultural Heritage, 2023, 8(1): 81-93] DOI: 10.19490/j.cnki.issn2096-698X.2023.01.081-093
[30] 贺雪峰. 大城市的“脚”还是乡村的“脑”?——中西部县域经济与县域城镇化的逻辑[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2022(5): 55-62. [HE Xuefeng. Big cities' “Feet” or the country's “Brain”: The logic of county economy and urbanization in central and western regions [J]. Social Science Journal, 2022(5): 55-62]
[31] 贺雪峰. 东部农村并非中国农村的未来[J]. 中国乡村发现, 2023(3): 39-41. [HE Xuefeng. The eastern countryside is not the future of rural China [J]. Discoveries in Rural China, 2023(3): 39-41]

相似文献/References:

[1]熊 熙,张仕超*,梁靖茹,等.丘陵山区家庭农场时空拓展特征及驱动力分析——以重庆市江津区为例[J].山地学报,2021,(1):71.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000577]
　XIONG Xi,ZHANG Shichao*,LIANG Jingru,et al.Spatiotemporal Expansion Characteristics and Driving Forces of Family Farms in Hilly and Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Jiangjin District of Chongqing, China[J].Mountain Research,2021,(4):71.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000577]
[2]郑光辉,蒋涤非,栾永飞,等.乡村振兴背景下的贵州农业产业空间分异[J].山地学报,2021,(3):429.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000608]
　ZHENG Guanghui,JIANG Difei,LUAN Yongfei,et al.Spatial Differentiation of Agricultural Industry in Guizhou Province of China under Rural Revitalization[J].Mountain Research,2021,(4):429.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000608]
[3]唐玉萍,潘洪义*,张之凤,等.山地丘陵区乡村类型划分及乡村振兴路径研究——以绵阳市为例[J].山地学报,2022,(5):764.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000710]
　TANG Yuping,PAN Hongyi*,ZHANG Zhifeng,et al.Classification of Village Types and the Corresponding Path of Rural Revitalization in Mountainous Areas—A Case Study of Mianyang City, Sichuan Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2022,(4):764.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000710]
[4]邓 伟,张少尧,王占韵,等.乡村振兴:山村发展路径与模式的科学探究[J].山地学报,2022,(6):791.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000713]
　DENG Wei,ZHANG Shaoyao,WANG Zhangyun,et al.Rural Revitalization in China: Scientific Inquiry into the Development Path and Mode of Mountain Villages[J].Mountain Research,2022,(4):791.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000713]
[5]周达宝a,b,徐丽婷a,等.脱贫地区乡村振兴水平时空演变及障碍因子——以江西罗霄山区为例[J].山地学报,2024,(1):81.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000806]
　ZHOU Dabaoa,b,XU Litinga,et al.Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Rural Revitalization Level and Its Obstacle Factors in Poverty-Alleviation Regions: A Case Study of the Luoxiao Mountains Region in Jiangxi Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2024,(4):81.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000806]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2024- 07- 01; 改回日期(Accepted date):2024- 08-22
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家自然科学基金面上项目(42371275); 国家自然科学基金重点项目(41930651)。 [General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(42371275); Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(41930651)]
作者简介(Biography): 邓伟(1957-),男,博士,二级研究员,主要研究方向:山区资源环境与国土空间发展。[DENG Wei(1957-), male, Ph.D., professor, specialized in resources and environment in mountainous areas and development of land and space] E-mail: dengwei@sicnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-30