[1]徐 伟,张 云,梅朱寅.郭达山后山危岩带特征分析及危险性评价[J].山地学报,2016,(06):741-748.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000181]
　XU Wei,ZHANG Yun,MEI Zhuyin.Characteristic Analysis and Risk Assessment of Guo Dashan Mount[J].Mountain Research,2016,(06):741-748.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000181]
点击复制

郭达山后山危岩带特征分析及危险性评价()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
741-748
栏目:
山地灾害
出版日期:
2016-12-08

文章信息/Info

Title:
Characteristic Analysis and Risk Assessment of Guo Dashan Mount
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2016)6-741-08
作者:
徐 伟1; 张 云2; 梅朱寅3
1.成都地质矿产研究所,四川 成都 610081;
2.湖北省鄂东南地质大队,湖北 黄石 435100;
3.浙江华东建设工程有限公司,浙江 杭州 310030
Author(s):
XU Wei; ZHANG Yun;  MEI Zhuyin
1.Chengdu Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources,Chengdu 610081,China;
2.Hubei southeast geological brigade,Huangshi 435100,China;
3.Zhejiang Huadong Construction Engineering CO,LTD Hangzhou 310030,China
关键词:
康定县; 郭达山; 赤平投影法; 滑动模式; 碰撞弹跳模式; 危险性评价
Keywords:
Kangding County;  GuoDashan Mount;  equatorial projection method;  sliding mode;  crashing and bouncing mode;  risk assessment
分类号:
TU 443
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000181
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
郭达山后山危岩带位于康定县城郭达街后山山腰,直接威胁康定县城近2000人的生命财产安全,开展相应研究工作具有紧迫性和必要性。对郭达山后山危岩带的工程地质条件和演化历史进行了分析描述; 将危岩带分为崩塌Ⅰ区、崩塌Ⅱ区、崩塌Ⅲ区,分析其基本特征,并对每个区内的典型危岩体进行了崩塌类型及稳定性定性分析; 采用RMR岩体分类与质量评价法对崩塌岩体进行岩体分级,属Ⅳ级,岩体质量属差岩体,表明郭达山后山危岩带岩体整体稳定性较差; 采用赤平投影分析得出崩塌Ⅰ区、Ⅱ区内由层面与裂隙1裂隙3切割成的楔形体在风化、降雨、地震等外力条件下极易发生崩塌; 采用运动学原理分析运动特征,计算落石滚动滑动模式下落石与受灾体碰撞前的速度,分别为崩塌Ⅰ区33.05 m/s、崩塌Ⅱ区52.15 m/s、崩塌Ⅲ区57.41 m/s; 采用恢复系数法计算落石坠落碰撞弹跳模式下的弹跳高度落为16.46 m,最后对郭达山后山危岩带进行了危险性评价,分高危险性、中危险性、低危险性三个等级制作了危险性区划图。为地方的防灾减灾提供了一定的科学依据和技术支撑。
Abstract:
The unstable rock zone was developed at the rear of Guo Dashan Mount, on the middle hillside immediately behind Guo Da Street of Kangding City, posing great threats to lives and properties of nearly 2000 people in the vicinity. It was imperative to initiate field work on its stability. In this research, it started with an analytical survey of the unstable rock zone in the engineering geological conditions and evolutionary history. Result confirmed that the unstable rock zone of Guo Dashan Mount could be divided into three rockfall sections, Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ. Typical unstable rock mass was selected at each section for qualitative categorization with reference to stability analysis and definite rockfall type. RMR method was referred to for determination of rock mass classification and it concluded that the unstable rock zone was in the poor quality, IV level, indicating that the whole rock mass was suffering from collapse; By stereographic projection analysis, it suggested that spalls, which consist of rock wedges enveloped by strata, joint 1 and joint3, was very prone to drop off from the rockfall section Ⅰ, Ⅱ in case of favorite conditions, such as weathering, rainfall, earthquakes and other external forces. Kinematics analysis exhibited that falling rocks in the rolling-sliding model would arrived at a rate of 33.05 m/s, 52.15 m/s, 57.41 m/s, in the rockfall sectionⅠ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ respectively, before it hit the collision mass; Restitution coefficient method was used to calculate the bouncing height of a falling rock in the numerical model of rockfall bounce and collision, with an estimated number 16.46m in height, In the end, the unstable rock zone of Guo Dashan Mount were zoning for risk division and accordingly geohazard division map was produced in terms of three levels, high risk, medium risk and low risk. This research provides some scientific basis and technical support for geohazard prevention and mitigation on a local basis

参考文献/References:

[1] 张永兴.边坡工程学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.[ZHANG Yongxing.Slope geological engineering[M].Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2008.]
[2] 张永亮. 沙棘根系生物力学特性研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2011.[ZHANG Yongliang. Research on biomechanical characteristic of sea-buckthorn [D].Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,2011.]
[3] 陈丽华.林木根系固土力学机制[M].北京:科学出版社,2008,3.[CHEN Lihua. The mechanisms of soil-reinforcement by roots system [M].Beijing:Science Press,2008,3.]
[4] 封金财,王建华. 植物根的存在对边坡稳定性的作用[J].华东交通大学学报, 2003,05: 42-45[FENG Jincai,WANG Jianhua.The stability of slope with plant root[J].Journal of East China Jiaotong University,2003,05:42-45]
[5] 陈学平. 湖北沪蓉西高速公路护坡植被重建研究[D].北京林业大学,2009.[CHEN Xueping.The research on revegetation in Highway of West Hurong,Hubei[D].Beijing Forestry University,2009.]
[6] 刘国彬,蒋定生,朱显谟. 黄土区草地根系生物力学特性研究[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,03:21-28[LIU Guobin,JIANG Dingsheng,ZHU Xianmo. Research on biomechanical characteristic of grass roots in loess area [J]. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation,1996,03:21-28]
[7] Lin Zhao, Hong Hu, Qian Li, Dong Chen. Study of Steep Rocky Slope Reinforcement and Ecological Protection Engineering near Residential Communities in Mountainous Cities. The National Conference on Slope Engineering Protection, Green and Geological Disaster Prevention and Control Technology Interchange, 2011: 76-81
[8] TSUKAMOTO Y, KUSAKABE O. Vegetative influences on debris slide occurrences on steep slopes in Japan[C]//Proc. Symp.Effects Forest Land Use on Erosion and Slope Stability. Honolulu: Environment and Policy Institute, 1984.
[9] POLLEN N. Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of stream banks: Accounting for soil shear strength and moisture[J]. Catena, 2007, 69(3): 197-205
[10] 杨永兵,施斌,杨卫东,等. 边坡治理中的植物固坡法[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2002,29(1):64–67[YANG Yongbing,SHI Bing,YANG Weidong,et al. The method of vegetation for slope protection in slope treatment[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology,2002,29(1):64–67(in Chinese)]
[11] 朱锦奇,王云琦,王玉杰,张会兰,李云鹏,刘勇. 基于试验与模型的根系增强抗剪强度分析[J]. 岩土力学,2014,02:449-458 [ZHU Jinqi,WANG Yunqi,WANG Yujie,et al.Analys on the effect of roots on shear strength based on the tested and model[J]. Rock Mechanics,2014,02:449-458]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目(Foundation item):中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD20160274)[Geological Survey Project of China Geological Survey(DD20160274)]
作者简介(Biography):徐伟(1986-),男,山东淄博人,硕士,工程师,主要研究方向:地质灾害调查与评价 [Xu Wei(1986-),male,born in Zibo, Shandong province,engineer,research on geological hazard investigation and evaluation]E-mail: 052054@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-30