[1]王 权,李阳兵*.岩溶槽谷区地形起伏特征及其对景观格局的影响[J].山地学报,2019,(05):702-716.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000461]
　WANG Quan,LI Yangbing*.The Characteristics of Topographic Relief and Its Influence on Landscape Pattern in Karst Trough Valley Area[J].Mountain Research,2019,(05):702-716.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000461]
点击复制

岩溶槽谷区地形起伏特征及其对景观格局的影响()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
702-716
栏目:
山地环境
出版日期:
2019-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Characteristics of Topographic Relief and Its Influence on Landscape Pattern in Karst Trough Valley Area
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2019)5-702-15
作者:
王 权; 李阳兵*
贵州师范大学 地理与环境科学学院,贵阳 550025
Author(s):
WANG Quan;  LI Yangbing*
School of Geographic and Environmental Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
关键词:
岩溶槽谷;  地形起伏;  均值变点法;  样带;  景观格局;  GIS
Keywords:
karst trough valley;  topographic relief;  mean point method;  sample tape;  landscape pattern;  GIS
分类号:
P901, Q149~A
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000461
摘要:
在当前多因素驱动下探讨岩溶槽谷区地形起伏对景观格局的影响,对区域景观规划和生态修复具有重要意义。本文以2017年Google Earth 0.53 m高清影像和DEM(Digital Elevation Model)为数据源,结合实地调查验证,通过移动窗口法和均值变点法提取地形起伏度和典型代表性样带设计,从景观水平尺度探究地形起伏对景观格局的影响,并运用Logistic回归模型分析景观格局和影响因子之间的定量关系,揭示其现实与理论意义。结果表明:受槽谷地形起伏特征影响,景观类型随地形起伏度的增加呈现不同的变化模式; 西部槽谷景观类型呈三种变化模式,中部槽谷呈现先增加后增减少的变化模式,东部槽谷呈两种变化模式; 低地形起伏区域景观结构较复杂,高地形起伏度区域景观呈现单一性; 景观格局由低地形起伏向高起伏演变呈现出梯度差异性,景观格局由人为景观逐渐向自然景观过渡; 岩溶槽谷区景观格局在地形起伏度的分布受多重因素影响,其中自然条件是景观格局决定因素,社会经济是推动因素,政策是再分配因素。
Abstract:
It is of great significance to explore the influence of topographic relief of karst trough valley on landscape pattern under the backgrounds driven by various factors, which can help the regional landscape planning and ecological restoration. This study, based on the Google Earth image of 2017 with 0.53 m resolution and DEM(Digital Elevation Model)as the data source combined with field survey to verify the images, used the move window method and the mean variable point method to extract the topographic relief and the typical representative sample tape design to study the impact of topographic relief on the landscape pattern in landscape level scales. The quantitative relationship between landscape pattern and influence factors was analyzed by logistic regression model, and its reality and theoretical significance were revealed, too. Influenced by the topographical features of trough valley, the landscape type showed different change modes as the terrain relief increases, i.e., the landscape type of the western trough valley showed three change modes, a first increased and then decreased mode in the middle trough valley, two change modes in the eastern trough valley. The landscape structure of the low terrain relief area was complex, while the landscape of the high terrain relief area was unitary. The landscape pattern showed a gradient difference from low terrain relief to high relief, which was gradual transition from the artificial landscape to the natural landscape. The distribution of the landscape pattern in different topographic relief in karst trough valley area was affected by various factors, of which the natural conditions were the determinants of landscape pattern, the social economy conditions were the driving factor, and the policy was the redistribution factor.

参考文献/References:

[1] LIU Jiyuan, ZHANG Zengxiang, XU Xinliang, et al. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2010, 20(4): 483-494.
[2] ANDREW B, INGRID S. Changing landscape identity-practice, plurality, and power [J]. 2019, 44(3): 271-277.
[3] KORUP O, MONTGOMERY D R, HEWITT K. Glacier and landslide feedbacks to topographic relief in the Himalayan syntaxes [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(12): 5317-5322.
[4] SPADA F, CONTI F. Lagozzo: Patterns of Floristic Diversity and Topographical Heterogeneity in a Forest Ecosystem in Monti Della Meta(S-C Italy)[J]. Giornale botanico italiano, 1994, 128(1): 385-385.
[5] ROERINGJ J, KIRCHNER J W, DIETRICH W E. Characterizing structural and lithologic controls on deep-seated landsliding: implications for topographic relief and landscape evolution in the Oregon coast range, USA. Geol Soc Am Bull [J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2005, 117(5): 654-668.
[6] 宋戈, 王盼盼.松嫩高平原县域土地利用空间格局地形梯度特征分析--以巴彦县为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(8):1218-1225.[SONG Ge, WANG Panpan. Spatial pattern of land use along the terrain gradient of county in Songnen high plain: a case study of Bayan county[J].SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2017, 37(8): 1218-1225]
[7] RIITTERS K H, ONEILL R V, HUNSAKER C T, et al. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics [J]. Landscape Ecology, 1995, 10(1): 23-39.
[8] 张静, 任志远. 秦巴山区土地利用时空格局及地形梯度效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(14): 250-257. [ZHANG Jing, REN Zhiyuan. Spatiotemporal pattern and terrain gradient effect of land use change in Qinling-Bashan mountains [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(14): 250-257]
[9] HASSAN G F, SHARIF A O, TUZUN U, et al. The effect of many-body interactions on the electrostatic force in an array of spherical particles [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 346(1): 232-235.
[10] 张静静, 朱文博, 赵芳, 等. 山地平原过渡带地形起伏特征及其对景观格局的影响--以太行山淇河流域为例[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2018, 48(4): 102-112. [ZHANG Jingjing, ZHU Wenbo, ZHAO Fang, et al. The characteristics of topographic relief in the transition zone of mountain plain and its influence on landscape pattern-taking the Taihangshan Qihe River Basin as an example[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Terrae, 2018, 48(4): 102-112]
[11] 许尔琪, 张红旗. 喀斯特山地土地利用变化的垂直分布特征[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(12): 1693-1702. [XU Erqi, ZHANG Hongqi. Vertical distribution of land use in karst mountainous region [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(12): 1693-1702]
[12] 赵卫权, 苏维词, 袁俊. 基于地形起伏度的贵州省景观空间格局分异特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2010, 17(2): 105-110. [ZHAO Weiquan, SU Weici, YUAN Jun. Heterogeneity of landscape pattern based on the relief in Guizhou Province [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 17(2): 105-110]
[13] 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 杜虎, 等. 中国西南喀斯特石漠化时空演变特征、发生机制与调控对策[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(18): 5328-5341. [SONG Tongqing, PENG Wanxia, DU Hu, et al. Occurrence, spatial-temporal dynamics and regulation strategies of karst rocky desertification in southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(18): 5328-5341]
[14] PUTZ F E, Ruslandi, ELLIS P W, et al. Topographic restrictions on land-use practices: consequences of different pixel sizes and data sources for natural forest management policies in the tropics [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 422: 108-113.
[15] BOOTH A M, ROERING J J, REMPEL A W. Topographic signatures and a general transport law for deep-seated landslides in a landscape evolution model [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2013, 118(2): 603-624.
[16] ZHANG H P, ZHANG P Z, KIRBY E, et al. Along-strike topographic variation of the Longmen Shan and its significance for landscape evolution along the eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 40(4): 855-864.
[17] 王正雄, 蒋勇军, 张远嘱, 等. 基于GIS与地理探测器的岩溶槽谷石漠化空间分布及驱动因素分析[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5):1025-1039.[WANG Zhengxiong, JIANG Yongjun, ZHANG Yuanzhu, et al. Spatial distribution and driving factors of karst rocky desertification based on GIS and geodetectors[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2019, 74(5): 1025-1039]
[18] 李阳兵, 黄娟, 徐倩, 等. 对石漠化概念及其治理的再思考[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 35(5): 1-6, 55. [LI Yangbing, HUANG Juan, XU Qian, et al. Rethinking the concept and restoration of Karst rocky desertification[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Natural Sciences), 2017,35(5): 1-6,55]
[19] 蒋勇军, 刘秀明, 何师意, 等. 喀斯特槽谷区土地石漠化与综合治理技术研发[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7092-7097.[JIANG Yongjun, LIU Xiuming, HE Shiyi, et al. Research and development of comprehensive rehabilitation measures for land rocky desertification in karst trough valley area [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22): 7092-7097]
[20] JIANG Yongjun, CAO Min, YUAN Daoxian, et al. Hydrogeolo-gical characterization and environmental effects of the deteriorating urban karst groundwater in a karst trough valley: Nanshan, SW China[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2018, 26(5): 1487-1497.
[21] 赵宇鸾, 李秀彬, 张颖. 黔桂喀斯特山地与山区类型划分技术与应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(7): 934-940. [ZHAO Yuluan, LI Xiubing, ZHANG Ying. Technology and application of mountainous area divisions in Qian-Gui Karst areas[J].Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2017, 19(7): 934-940]
[22] 张颖, 赵宇鸾. 基于DEM的横断山县域山区类型划分[J]. 贵州师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 34(6): 8-14. [ZHANG Ying, ZHAO Yuluan. Mountainous area divisions at county level in Hengduan Mountains based on DEM [J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Natural Sciences), 2016, 34(6): 8-14]
[23] 周成虎, 程维明, 钱金凯, 等. 中国陆地1: 100万数字地貌分类体系研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2009, 11(6): 707-724. [ZHOU Chenghu, CHENG Weiming, QIAN Jinkai, et al. Research on the Classification System of Digital Land Geomorphology of 1:1 000 000 in China [J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2009, 11(6): 707-724]
[24] 李阳兵, 姚原温, 谢静, 等. 贵州省山地-坝地系统土地利用与景观格局时空演变[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(12): 3257-3265. [LI Yangbing, YAO Yuanwen, XIE Jing, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of land use and landscape pattern of the mountain-basin system in Guizhou Province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(12):3257-3265]
[25] 哈凯, 丁庆龙, 门明新, 等. 山地丘陵区土地利用分布及其与地形因子关系--以河北省怀来县为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(5): 909-921. [HA Kai, DING Qinglong, MEN Mingxin, et al. Spatial distribution of land use and its relationship with terrain factors in hilly area[J].Geographical Research, 2015, 34(5): 909-921]
[26] 赵志轩, 张彪, 金鑫, 等. 海河流域景观空间梯度格局及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(7): 1925-1935. [ZHAO Zhixuan, ZHANG Biao, JIN Xin,et al. Spatial gradients pattern of landscapes and their relations with environmental factors in Haihe River basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011, 31(7): 1925-1935]
[27] 臧玉珠,刘彦随,杨园园. 山区县域土地利用格局变化及其地形梯度效应--以井冈山市为例[J].自然资源学报, 2019 34(7): 1391-1404. [ZANG Yuzhu, LIU Yansui, YANG Yuanyuan. Land use pattern change and its topographic gradient effect in the mountainous areas: a case study of Jinggangshan city [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(7):1391-1404]
[28] AMORI G, GIPPOLITI S, LUISELLI L, et al. Do interlinks between geography and ecology explain the latitudinal diversity patterns in Sciuridae? An approach at the genus level [J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2009, 87(3): 246-253.
[29] 陈铸, 黄雅冰, 朱志鹏, 等. 基于地形梯度特征的福州市景观格局演变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12):247-256. [CHEN Zhu, HUANG Yabing, ZHU Zhipeng, et al. Landscape pattern evolution along terrain gradient in Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(12): 247-256]
[30] 刘亚香, 李阳兵, 易兴松, 等. 贵州典型坝子土地利用强度空间演变及景观格局响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(11): 3691-3702. [LIU Yaxiang, LI Yangbing, YI Xingsong, et al. Spatial evolution of land use intensity and landscape pattern response of the typical basins in Guizhou Province,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(11): 3691-3702]
[31] BRYNGELSON J D, ONUCHIC N O, SOCCI N D, et al. Funnels, pathways and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis [J]. Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 1995, 21(3):167-195.
[32] 王媛媛, 周忠发, 魏小岛. 石漠化景观格局对土地利用时空演变的响应[J]. 山地学报, 2013, 31(3): 307-313. [WANG Yuanyuan, ZHOU Zhongfa, WEI Xiaodao. Rocky desertification landscape pattern on spatio-temporal evolution of land use the response [J]. Mountain Research, 2013, 31(3): 307-313]
[33] 王权, 李阳兵, 刘亚香. 岩溶槽谷区山坡-槽坝土地利用变化的对比研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(1): 122-133. [WANG Quan, LI Yangbing, LIU Yaxiang. Comparative study of land use change in Karst hillside-trough dam area [J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(1): 122-133]
[34] ZHAO Ruifeng, CHEN Y, SHI Peiji, et al. Land use and land cover change and driving mechanism in the arid inland river basin: a case study of Tarim River, Xinjiang, China [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 68(2): 591-604.
[35] MIGUEL D M, FARFáN M á, OLIVERO J, et al. Land-use changes as a critical factor for long-term wild rabbit conservation in the Iberian Peninsula [J]. Environmental Conservation, 2010, 37(2): 169-176.
[36] 童晓伟, 王克林, 岳跃民, 等. 桂西北喀斯特区域植被变化趋势及其对气候和地形的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(12): 3425-3434. [TONG Xiaowei, WANG Kelin, YUE Yuemin, et al. Trends in vegetation and their responses to climate and topography in northwest Guangxi [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(12):3425-3434]
[37] FORKUOR G, COFIE O. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in Freetown, Sierra Leone and its effects on urban and peri-urban agriculture-a remote sensing approach [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2011, 32(4): 1017-1037.
[38] 王权, 李阳兵, 黄娟, 等. 喀斯特槽谷区土地利用转型过程对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(3):192-198. [WANG Quan, LI Yangbing, HUANG Juan, et al. Effect of land use transformation process on ecosystem service value in Karst trough valley[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(3): 192-198]
[39] 刘吉平, 董春月, 盛连喜, 等. 1955-2010年小三江平原沼泽湿地景观格局变化及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(6): 879-887. [LIU Jiping, DONG Chunyue, SHENG Lianxi, et al. Landscape pattern change of marsh and its response to human disturbance, in the small Sanjiang Plain, 1955-2010[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(6): 879-887]
[40] 王丹丹, 王志强, 陈铭, 等. 松嫩平原西部沼泽湿地景观格局动态变化研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2006, 29(1): 94-100. [WANG Dandan, WANG Zhiqiang, CHEN Ming, et al. Dynamic change of marsh landscape patterns in the west Songnen plain[J].Arid Land Geography, 2006, 29(1): 94-100]
[41] 王宗明, 宋开山, 刘殿伟, 等. 三江平原桦南县景观格局时序变化与驱动因素研究[J]. 生态科学, 2007, 26(5): 401-407.[WANG Zongming, SONG Kaishan, LIU Dianwei, et al. Changes in landscape patterns and driving forces in Huanan County, Sanjiang Plain, over the past 50 years[J]. Ecological Science, 2007, 26(5): 401-407]
[42] 杨钟贤, 苏春江. 平原与山区土地利用/覆被变化对比--以双流县和米易县为例[J]. 山地学报, 2009, 27(5): 585-592. [YANG Zhongxian, SU Chunjiang. A comparative study between plain and mountain on LUCC: case study of Shuang liu county and Miyi county, Sichuan[J].Mountain Research,2009, 27(5): 585-592]
[43] 张玲玲, 赵永华, 殷莎, 等. 基于移动窗口法的岷江干旱河谷景观格局梯度分析[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(12): 3276-3284. [ZHANG Lingling, ZHAO Yonghua, YIN Sha, et al. Gradient analysis of dry valley of Minjiang River landscape pattern, based on moving window method [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(12): 3276-3284]

相似文献/References:

[1]周 亮,徐建刚,林 蔚,等.秦巴山连片特困区地形起伏与人口及经济关系[J].山地学报,2015,(06):742.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000090]
　ZHOU Liang,XU Jiangang,et al.Relationship of Terrain Relief Degree and Population Economic Development and Evaluation of Development Suitability in Continuous Poor Areas: A Case Study on Qinba of National Contiguous Special Poverty-stricken Areas[J].Mountain Research,2015,(05):742.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000090]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date):2019-05-20; 改回日期(Accepted date): 2019-09-11
基金项目(Foundation item):贵州师范大学研究生创新基金项目(YC[2018]025); 国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0502300); 国家自然科学基金项目(41661020)。[Guizhou Normal University Graduate Innovation Fund Project(YC[2018]025); National Key R&D Program(2016YFC0502300); National Natural Science Foundation of China(41661020)]
作者简介(Biography):王权(1993- ),男,硕士研究生,贵州铜仁人,主要从事土地利用与规划方面研究。 [WANG Quan(1993- ), male, M.Sc. Candidate, born in Tongren, Guizhou Province, research on land use and planning] E-mail:excellent_wangquan@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-30