[1]刘 洋,薛秀峰,张仕超*,等.喀斯特山区旱改水时空格局演变及影响因素——以酉阳县为例[J].山地学报,2025,(1):87-104.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000878]
　LIU Yang,XUE Xiufeng,ZHANG Shichao*,et al.Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Dryland-to-Paddy Conversion in Karst Mountainous Areas and Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Youyang County, China[J].Mountain Research,2025,(1):87-104.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000878]
点击复制

喀斯特山区旱改水时空格局演变及影响因素——以酉阳县为例()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2025年第1期
页码:
87-104
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2025-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Dryland-to-Paddy Conversion in Karst Mountainous Areas and Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Youyang County, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(20251-087-18)
作者:
刘 洋1; 薛秀峰1; 张仕超1; 2*; 张 湘1; 陆张烨1
(1.重庆师范大学 三峡库区地表过程与生态修复重庆市重点实验室,重庆 401331; 2.三峡库区地表生态过程重庆市野外科学观测研究站,重庆 401331)
Author(s):
LIU Yang1;  XUE Xiufeng1;  ZHANG Shichao1; 2*;  ZHANG Xiang1;  LU Zhangye1
(1. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Surface Process and Ecological Restoration in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China; 2. Surface Ecological Process Field Observation and Research Station, Chongqing Three Gorges Reservoir Area,Chongqing 401331, China)
关键词:
旱改水;  时空格局;  影响因素;  喀斯特山地区;  酉阳县
Keywords:
dryland-to-paddy conversion;  spatial-temporal pattern;  influencing factor;  karst mountainous region;  Youyang County
分类号:
F301.21
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000878
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
喀斯特山地区是典型的生态-生产复合系统脆弱区,其耕地资源面临坡耕地占比高(>35%)、地块破碎化指数达0.57、石漠化面积占比超60%等多重约束,传统“旱改水”工程实施面临特殊挑战。旱改水是破解“缺水田”结构性矛盾,提升耕地质量、增加粮食产能、完善占补平衡的重要举措。然而,既有研究主要聚焦于典型平原区,针对喀斯特山地区旱改水格局演变研究不足,对旱改水利用稳定性变化未予以充分阐述。本文以武陵山区酉阳县为典型案例,利用1995—2020年土地利用和社会经济数据,使用土地利用转移矩阵、标准差椭圆和地理探测器模型等方法,揭示山地特殊情境下旱地-水田转型的时空逻辑。结果表明:(1)酉阳县旱改水转型过程呈现“U”型阶段波动特征,受城镇化与退耕还林政策双重作用,2005年为转型强度拐点。(2)空间格局呈向心集聚特征,以东北—西南格局为主; 转型活动集中于涂市镇,空间重心南移达107 m?a-1,未向其他乡镇扩散。(3)85%的旱地图斑保持稳定,稳定性地块存在显著地带分异,缓坡区(6°～15°)稳定性地块占比达73.98%,形成龙潭—麻旺—泔溪带状稳定区。(4)驱动机制呈现“自然禀赋-便利性”耦合特征,距道路距离与年平均气温的交互解释力最强(q=0.83),双因子增强型交互占比达86.47%。研究成果构建了喀斯特山区耕地转型理论模型,可以为破解“生态安全-粮食安全”权衡困境、建立差异化耕地保护制度提供决策支持 。
Abstract:
Karst mountainous regions are typical areas with fragile eco-production composite systems,where cultivated land resources face multiple constraints, including high proportions of sloping farmland(>35%), fragmented plots(fragmentation index = 0.57), and rocky desertification coverage exceeding 60%, posing great challenges to traditional dryland-to-paddy conversion projects. Dryland-to-paddy conversion is a critical initiative to resolve the structural contradiction of paddy deficiency, improve cultivated land quality, enhance grain production capacity and optimize land-use balance. However, past studies primarily focused on typical plain regions, with limited investigation into the spatiotemporal evolution of dryland-to-paddy conversion in karst mountainous areas and insufficient exploration of utilization stability.
In this study, it took Youyang County in the Wuling Mountains area as a case study. It collected land-use and socioeconomic data from 1995 to 2020 and employed land-use transition matrices, standard deviation ellipses, and geographical detector models to unravel the spatiotemporal logic of dryland-paddy transformation under karst mountainous conditions.
(1)The dryland-to-paddy conversion process in Youyang exhibited U-shaped phased fluctuations, with 2005 as the turning point under dual impacts of urbanization and the Grain-for-Green Program.
(2)The spatial pattern of the dryland-paddy transformation was characterized by centripetal aggregation dominated by a northeast-southwest orientation, concentrated in Tushi Town with a southward centroid migration rate of 107 m·a-1 and no signs of diffusion to other townships.
(3)In the Youyang, 85% of dryland patches remained stable, but with significant zonal differentiation. Gentle slope areas(6°-15°)accounted for the highest proportion of stable patches at 73.98%, constituting Longtan-Mawang-Ganxi belt-shaped stable zone.
(4)The driving mechanism of the dryland-paddy transformation reflected “natural endowment-convenience” coupling, where road proximity and annual mean temperature exhibited the strongest interactive explanatory power(q = 0.83), with bivariate-enhanced interactions accounting for 86.47% of the total interactions.
This study constructs a theoretical model for cultivated land transformation in karst mountainous areas, offering decision-making support for balancing ecological and food security and establishing differentiated cultivated land protection systems.

参考文献/References:

[1] ZHOU Yang, LI Xunhuan, LIU Yansui. Cultivated land protection and rational use in China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 106: 105454. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105454
[2] LAI Zhaohao, CHEN Meiqiu, LIU Taoju. Changes in and prospects for cultivated land use since the reform and opening up in China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 97: 104781. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104781
[3] 汤怀志, 桑玲玲, 郧文聚. 我国耕地占补平衡政策实施困境及科技创新方向[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(5): 637-644. [TANG Huaizhi, SANG Lingling, YUN Wenju. China's cultivated land balance policy implementation dilemma and direction of scientific and technological innovation [J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(5): 637-644] DOI: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20200313002
[4] LOU Yi, YIN Guangyi, XIN Yue, et al. Recessive transition mechanism of arable land use based on the perspective of coupling coordination of input-output: A case study of 31 provinces in China [J]. Land, 2021, 10(1): 41. DOI: 10.3390/land10010041
[5] GE Dazhuan, LONG Hualou, ZHANG Yingnan, et al. Farmland transition and its influences on grain production in China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 70: 94-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.010
[6] VLIET J V, DE GROOT H L F, RIETVELD P, et al. Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in Europe [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 133: 24-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.001
[7] 解帅, 殷冠羿, 娄毅, 等. 1990—2020年中国耕地利用的“水旱分异”格局及机制分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(6): 113-124. [XIE Shuai, YIN Guanyi, LOU Yi, et al. Differentiation pattern and driving mechanism of paddy field and dryland of China in 1990-2020 [J]. China Land Science, 2022, 36(6): 113-124] DOI: 0.11994/zgtdkx.20220606.102224
[8] 张文琦, 宋戈. 三江平原典型区水田时空变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(6): 244-252. [ZHANG Wenqi, SONG Ge. Spatial-temporal variations and driving factor analysis of paddy fields in typical regions of Sanjiang Plain [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(6): 244-252] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.06.030
[9] 宋戈, 杨雪昕, 高佳. 三江平原典型地区水田分布格局变化特征[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(8): 61-68. [SONG Ge, YANG Xuexin, GAO Jia. Study on the distribution patterns and characteristics of paddy cropland in the typical area of Sanjiang Plain [J]. China Land Science, 2017, 31(8): 61-68] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20170913.154755
[10] 郭维红, 蒋非非, 马静, 等. 2000—2020年中国耕地旱改水空间格局演变及其适应性管理[J]. 农业工程学报, 2024, 40(4): 292-303. [GUO Weihong, JIANG Feifei, MA Jing, et al. Spatial pattern evolution of dryland-to-paddy conversion in China and its adaptive management from the year 2000 to 2020 [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2024, 40(4): 292-303] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202306043
[11] 胡智毅, 范亚南. 基于GIS的广东省“旱改水”项目新增水田适宜性评价方法研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(12): 193-198. [HU Zhiyi, FAN Yanan. Research on suitability evaluation method for new paddy field in “dry land is changed into paddy fields” project based on GIS [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(12): 193-198] DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2018.12.060
[12] 罗傲蓝, 何灏, 曹银贵, 等. 重庆市长寿区旱改水潜力评价与优化研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(12): 172-182. [LUO Aolan, HE Hao, CAO Yingui, et al. Evaluation and optimization of dryland-to-paddy potential in Changshou disrtict, Chongqing [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(12): 172-182] DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20221218
[13] 刘洪秀, 赵华甫, 冯新伟, 等. 黑龙江农田生态系统服务权衡与协同[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(2): 160-171. [LIU Hongxiu, ZHAO Huafu, FENG Xinwei, et al. Trade-offs and synergy relationship of agricultural ecosystem in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2023, 28(2): 160-170] DOI: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2023.02.14
[14] 杨蕙琳, 娄运生, 刘燕, 等. 夜间增温品种混栽对稻田土壤CH4和N2O排放的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(2): 553-564. [YANG Huilin, LOU Yunsheng, LIU Yan, et al. Effect of rice intercropping on CH4 and N2O emissions in a subtropical paddy field under nighttime warming [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(2): 553-564] DOI: 10.5846 / stxb201909081873
[15] 陈浮, 李肖肖, 马静, 等. 旱改水型农田整治对土壤碳排放的短期影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(19): 7725-7734. [CHEN Fu, LI Xiaoxiao, MA Jing, et al. Short-term effects of land consolidation of dryland-to-paddy conversion on soil carbon flux [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(19): 7725-7734] DOI: 10.5846 / stxb202010282761
[16] 左岍, 周勇, 李晴, 等. 鄂西南地区土地利用格局时空变化及轨迹特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(1): 161-169. [ZUO Qian, ZHOU Yong, LI Qing, et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal changes and trajectory characteristics of land use pattern in the southwest Hubei [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(1): 161-169] DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2022.01.022
[17] 赵浣玎, 张仕超, 涂又, 等. “三位一体”视角下重庆库区水旱地分布格局及影响因素[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(6): 1273-1285. [ZHAO Huanding, ZHANG Shichao, TU You, et al. Distribution patterns and influencing factors of paddy field and dry land in Chongqing reservoir area in the vision of trinity conservation [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(6): 1273-1285] DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2021111302
[18] 于杰, 宁静, 董芳辰, 等. 1950-2013年三江平原东北部耕地分布变化特征分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(12): 79-86. [YU Jie, NING Jing, DONG Fangchen, et al. Distribution and evolutionary characteristics of cultivated lands in the northeast of Sanjiang Plain from 1950 to 2013 [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(12): 79-86] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2017.383
[19] 唐荣莉, 姚雄, 王春萍, 等. 基于地形梯度的重庆市近40年水田及旱地时空演变特征[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(9): 1939-1949. [TANG Rongli, YAO Xiong, WANG Chunping, et al. Spatial distribution and variation characteristics of paddy fields and dry land in Chongqing in past 40 years based on topographic gradient [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(9): 1939-1949] DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2021.9.018
[20] 楚玉春. 重庆喀斯特地貌研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2010: 2-45. [CHU Yuchun. Study of karst geomorphology in Chongqing City [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2010: 2-45]
[21] 酉阳土家族苗族自治县统计局. 酉阳土家族苗族自治县2023年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2024- 04-12). https://youyang.gov.cn/bmjz_sites/bm/tjj/zwgk_104134/fdzdgknr_104136/tjxx/tjgb/202404/t20240412_13125825.html. [Bureau of Statistics of Youyang Tujia and Miao Autonomous County. Statistical bulletin on the national economic and social development of Youyang Tujia and Miao Autonomous County in 2023 [EB/OL].(2024- 04-12). https://youyang.gov.cn/bmjz_sites/bm/tjj/zwgk_104134/fdzdgknr_104136/tjxx/tjgb/202404/t20240412_13125825.html]
[22] 酉阳土家族苗族自治县统计局. 酉阳县统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2021- 09-27). https://youyang.gov.cn/zwgk_236/zfxxgkml/tjxx/tjnj/202111/t20211118_9990192.html [Bureau of Statistics of Youyang Tujia and Miao Autonomous County. The statistical yearbook of Youyang County [EB/OL].(2021- 09-27). https://youyang.gov.cn/zwgk_236/zfxxgkml/tjxx/tjnj/202111/t20211118_9990192.html]
[23] 张钰莹, 孙美莹, 杨荣金, 等. 西南地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(1): 207-214. [ZHANG Yuying, SUN Meiying, YANG Rongjin, et al. Impact of land-use change on ecosystem service value in southwest China [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2022, 12(1): 207-214] DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210159
[24] 乔伟峰, 盛业华, 方斌, 等. 基于转移矩阵的高度城市化区域土地利用演变信息挖掘——以江苏省苏州市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1497-1507. [QIAO Weifeng, SHENG Yehua, FANG Bin, et al. Land use change information mining in highly urbanized area based on transfer matrix: A case study of Suzhou, Jiangsu Province [J]. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8): 1497-1507]
[25] CHU Honejay, LIAU Churnjung, LIN Chaohung, et al. Integration of fuzzy cluster analysis and kernel density estimation for tracking typhoon trajectories in the Taiwan region [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(10): 9451-9457. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.114
[26] 程研, 关颖慧, 吴秀芹. 基于土地利用变化的喀斯特断陷盆地景观格局演变与生态安全评价[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(22): 9471-9485. [CHENG Yan, GUAN Yinghui, WU Xiuqin. The spatial and temporal evolution of landscape pattern and landscape ecological security assessment in Karst Fault Basin based on land use change [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(22): 9471-9485] DOI: 10.20103/j.stxb.202207212097
[27] 李一琼, 白俊武. 近20年苏州土地利用动态变化时空特征分析[J]. 测绘科学, 2018, 43(6): 58-64. [LI Yiqiong, BAI Junwu. Analysis of temporal and spatial dynamic changes of land use of Suzhou in recent 20 years [J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2018, 43(6): 58-64] DOI: 10.16251/j.cnki.1009-2307.2018.06.010
[28] 位佳佳, 陈学渊, 吴永常, 等. 西北旱区耕地“非粮化”时空演变分析——以陕西大荔为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(4): 24-34. [WEI Jiajia, CHEN Xueyuan, WU Yongchang, et al. Analysis of the spatial and temporal evolution of arable land denudation in the northwest drylands: A case study of Dali, Shaanxi Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(4): 24-34] DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121. 20230403
[29] 王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. [WANG Jinfeng, XU Chengdong. Geodetector: Principle and prospective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
[30] 李胤, 詹雅婷, 赵立鸿, 等. 地理探测器方法下长江经济带(江苏段)土地城镇化时空演变及驱动因子分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2024(4): 135-139. [LI Yin, ZHAN Yating, ZHAO Lihong, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of land urbanization in the Yangtze River economic belt(Jiangsu section)using geographical detector [J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2024(4): 135-139] DOI: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2024.0423
[31] WANG Jinfeng, HU Yi. Environmental health risk detection with GeoDetector [J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2012, 33: 114-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.015
[32] 钱凤魁, 王秋兵. 基于农用地分等和LESA方法的基本农田划定[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011, 18(2): 251-255. [QIAN Fengkui, WANG Qiubing. Planning method of the prime farmland based on farmland classification and LESA method [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 18(2): 251-255]
[33] 林建平, 黄坤, 邓爱珍, 等. 耦合耕地综合质量和空间连通性的基本农田划定研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2024, 55(7): 221-231+251. [LIN Jianping, HUANG Kun, DENG Aizhen, et al. Basic farmland demarcation coupling comprehensive quality and spatial connectivity of cultivated land [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2024, 55(7): 221-231+251] DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2024.07.021
[34] 张瑞, 杜国明, 张树文. 1986—2020年东北典型黑土区耕地资源时空变化及其驱动因素[J]. 资源科学, 2023, 45(5): 939-950. [ZHANG Rui, DU Guoming, ZHANG Shuwen. Spatiotemporal changes and the driving factors of cultivated land resources of the typical black soil region in northeast China from 1986 to 2020 [J]. Resources Science, 2023, 45(5): 939-950] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2023.05.05
[35] 钱凤魁, 张琳琳, 边振兴, 等. 高标准基本农田建设中的耕地质量与立地条件评价研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2015, 46(5): 1049-1055. [QIAN Fengkui, ZHANG Linlin, BIAN Zhenxing, et al. Farmland natural quality evaluation and site assessment in the high-standard basic farmland construction [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 46(5): 1049-1055] DOI: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2015.05.004
[36] 黎庆贵, 李瑞, 商崇菊, 等. 黔西北喀斯特区坡耕地有机覆盖措施保墒效应[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(4): 103-114. [LI Qinggui, LI Rui, SHANG Chongju, et al. Effects of organic mulching measures on soil moisture conservation of sloping farmland in karst areas of northwest Guizhou [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 18(4): 103-114] DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2020.04.012
[37] 梁晓玲, 王璐, 黎诚, 等. 基于数量、质量、生态三位一体的永久基本农田快速优化布局研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(6): 946-956. [LIANG Xiaoling, WANG Lu, LI Cheng, et al. Research on the rapid optimization of the layout of permanent basic farmland based on quantity, quality, and ecology [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2021, 38(6): 946-956] DOI: 10.13254/j.jare.2021.0518
[38] 陈杰华. 重庆市农田土壤有机碳库现状、变化趋势及固碳潜力研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2013: 5-132. [CHEN Jiehua. Study on storage and ecolution trend of soil organic carbon in cropland in Chongqing City [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2015: 5-132]
[39] 李辉丹, 史东梅, 夏蕊, 等. 基于地理探测器的重庆坡耕地时空格局演变特征及驱动机制[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(12): 280-290. [LI Huidan, SHI Dongmei, XIA Rui, et al. Evolution characteristics and driving mechanism for the spatiotemporal pattern of sloping farmland in Chongqing based on geodetector [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(12): 280-290] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.12.032
[40] 罗晓虹. 丘陵山区“旱改水”适宜性及整治技术研究——以重庆市万州区为例[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2022: 2-81. [LUO Xiaohong. Research on suitability and remediation technology of dry land into paddy field in hilly and mountainous areas: Take Wanzhou District of Chongqing City as an example [D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2022: 2-81] DOI: 10.27684/d.cnki.gxndx.2021.002652
[41] 赵馨, 周忠发, 朱孟, 等. 基于景观格局的西南山区耕地生态风险研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(6): 362-369+376. [ZHAO Xin, ZHOU Zhongfa, ZHU Meng, et al. Research on ecological risk of karst rocky desertification cultivated land based on landscape pattern [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(6): 362-369+376] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.06.047
[42] 魏雪, 刘黎明, 张定祥, 等. 湖南省水田占补平衡政策实施绩效评价[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(1): 57-67. [WEI Xue, LIU Liming, ZHANG Dingxiang, et al. Performance evaluation on the policy of balancing paddy field occupation and reclamation in Hunan Province [J]. China Land Science, 2022, 36(1): 57-67] DOI: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20211227.161139
[43] 文可可, 张仕超, 薛秀峰. 三位一体视角下三峡库区耕地资源内外转换轨迹和特征——以江津区为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(2): 175-185. [WEN Keke, ZHANG Shichao, XUE Xiufeng. Trajectories and characteristics of internal and external transformation of cultivated land resources in the Three Gorges Reservoir area from the perspective of the trinity: Taking Jiangjin District as an example [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(2): 175-185] DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.02.014
[44] 张扬, 周忠发, 黄登红, 等. 喀斯特山区耕地时空演变与影响因子分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(22): 266-275. [ZHANG Yang, ZHOU Zhongfa, HUANG Denghong, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution of cultivated land and analysis of influence factors in karst mountainous areas [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(22): 266-275] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.22.030
[45] 唐若宜, 李发文. 基于流域尺度的耕地时空格局演变与分异性研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2024, 35(4): 187-197. [TANG Ruoyi, LI Fawen. Spatiotemporal evolution of cultivated land on basin scale [J]. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering, 2024, 35(4): 187-197] DOI: 10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2024.04.22

相似文献/References:

[1]徐凌星,杨德伟*,刘丹丹,等.青藏高原生态系统服务的时空分布特征与供需关系[J].山地学报,2020,(4):483.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000527]
　XU Lingxing,YANG Dewei,et al.Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Supply-Demand Relationships of Ecosystem Services on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J].Mountain Research,2020,(1):483.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000527]
[2]王永明,王美霞*.武陵山片区县域相对贫困的时空演化与驱动因素[J].山地学报,2021,(4):576.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000621]
　WANG Yongming,WANG Meixia*.The Temporal-Spatial Evolution and Driving Factors of Relative Poverty in the Wuling Mountainous Area, China[J].Mountain Research,2021,(1):576.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000621]
[3]马 琪,王梓柔,赵永宏.西安市“三生空间”时空格局演化与功能测度[J].山地学报,2021,(5):722.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000633)]
　MA Qi,WANG Zirou,ZHAO Yonghong.Evolution of Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Functional Measurement of “Production-Living-Ecological” Space in Xi'an, China[J].Mountain Research,2021,(1):722.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000633)]
[4]王永红,鲁 恒*.2001—2018年云南省植被变化及驱动力[J].山地学报,2022,(4):531.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000691]
　WANG Yonghong,LU Heng*.Driving Force of Vegetation Cover Change in Yunnan Province from 2001 to 2018[J].Mountain Research,2022,(1):531.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000691]
[5]曹艺凡,杨 春,王 旭.重庆市乡村生态系统健康时空格局演化及规划调控研究[J].山地学报,2022,(6):902.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000722]
　CAO Yifan,YANG Chun,WANG Xu.Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Rural Ecosystem Health in Chongqing, China and Associated Planning Regulation[J].Mountain Research,2022,(1):902.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000722]
[6]张永峰a,b,c,等.民系视角下的福建省乡村聚落空间格局演化及特征[J].山地学报,2023,(5):701.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000781]
　ZHANG Yongfenga,b,c,et al.Spatial Evolution of Rural Settlements in Fujian Province of China from a Perspective of Folk Group Division[J].Mountain Research,2023,(1):701.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000781]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2024-10-17; 改回日期(Accepted date):2025- 01-17
基金项目(Foundation item): 国家自然科学基金(41971244); 重庆市科委自然科学基金(cstc2021jcyjmsxmX0696)。[National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971244); Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing(cstc2021jcyjmsxmX0696)]
作者简介(Biography): 刘洋(2000-),女,四川凉山人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:土地利用与土地管理。[LIU Yang(2000-), female, born in Liangshan, Sichuan Province, M.Sc. candidate, research on land use and land management] E-mail:ly952230731@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 张仕超(1986-),女,博士,教授,主要研究方向:土地利用与生态过程。[ZHANG Shichao(1986-), female, Ph.D., professor, specialized in land use and ecological process] E-mail: lintualchao@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-01-30