[1]周达宝a,b,徐丽婷a,等.脱贫地区乡村振兴水平时空演变及障碍因子——以江西罗霄山区为例[J].山地学报,2024,(1):81-93.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000806]
　ZHOU Dabaoa,b,XU Litinga,et al.Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Rural Revitalization Level and Its Obstacle Factors in Poverty-Alleviation Regions: A Case Study of the Luoxiao Mountains Region in Jiangxi Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2024,(1):81-93.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000806]
点击复制

脱贫地区乡村振兴水平时空演变及障碍因子——以江西罗霄山区为例()
分享到：

《山地学报》[ISSN:1008-2186/CN:51-1516]

卷:
期数:
2024年第1期
页码:
81-93
栏目:
山区发展
出版日期:
2024-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Rural Revitalization Level and Its Obstacle Factors in Poverty-Alleviation Regions: A Case Study of the Luoxiao Mountains Region in Jiangxi Province, China
文章编号:
1008-2786-(2024)1-081-13
作者:
周达宝a;  b; 徐丽婷a;  b*; 许 鑫a;  b; 冯兴华a;  b
(江西师范大学 a. 地理与环境学院; b.鄱阳湖湿地与流域研究教育部重点实验室,南昌 330022)
Author(s):
ZHOU Dabaoa; b;  XU Litinga; b*;  XU Xina; b;  FENG Xinghuaa; b
(a. School of Geography and Environment; b. Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)
关键词:
乡村振兴;  障碍度模型;  时空演变;  障碍因子;  罗霄山区
Keywords:
rural revitalization;  obstacle degree model;  spatio-temporal evolution;  obstacle factors;  the Luoxiao Mountains region
分类号:
F323
DOI:
10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000806
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
评估脱贫地区乡村振兴水平是探索多元化高质量乡村振兴道路的必要条件。已有乡村振兴评价指标体系构建多从乡村振兴总体要求出发,缺乏从产业、人才、文化、生态、组织振兴角度的定量评价研究。本研究以江西罗霄山脉脱贫地区为例,基于县域尺度在五大振兴基础上建立评价指标体系,利用趋势面分析方法探索乡村振兴水平的时空演变,利用障碍度模型探究乡村振兴水平的主要障碍因子。结果表明:(1)2010—2020年江西罗霄山脉脱贫地区乡村振兴总体水平呈现上升态势,低水平县域不断缩减; 各县域乡村振兴逐步由“单极化”与“低水平”向“均衡化”与“高水平”发展,其中产业、文化、生态振兴水平增长显著,组织与人才振兴水平增长缓慢,且存在近半数县域与高水平乡村振兴存在一定差距,乡村振兴向高质量发展仍然有待提升。(2)乡村振兴水平的空间演化趋势在南北方向上基本保持“北低南高”的态势,东西方向上由“东高西低”向“西高东低”转变,总体差异不断缩减。乡村振兴的过程主要是由产业、文化、生态振兴所驱动,与当地生态文明示范区、南方集体林区等区域特征相对应。(3)10年间,农业生产下土地生产率与单位耕地机械总动力障碍度上升最为显著,逐渐成为主要障碍因子,至2020年障碍度均值分别为17.22%、15.70%,提升土地生产率与农业机械化水平成为未来乡村振兴的关键所在。本研究可为脱贫山区更好地协调人地关系,巩固脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接,以及实现乡村全面振兴与高质量发展提供参考。
Abstract:
Evaluating the stage of rural revitalization in poverty-alleviation regions is a prerequisite for determination of a proper approach to a diverse and high-quality rural development. The rural revitalization evaluation index systems to date were mostly built on the national requirement of rural revitalization, without inclusion of five influencing factors in quantitative evaluation models, such as industry, talent, culture, ecology, and organization revitalization.
In this study, the Luoxiao Mountains region, a well-known poverty-alleviation areas in Jiangxi province, China exemplified an admissible development approach for rural prosperity. An evaluation index system was established based on the foresaid five influencing factors on a county basis. Trend surface analysis was used to describe the spatio-temporal evolution of rural revitalization, and an obstacle degree model was introduced to determine the primary hindrances to progress.
(1)During 2010-2020, rural revitalization level in the Luoxiao Mountains region improved as a whole, with low-level counties shrinking. Rural revitalization in each county had gradually developed from a pattern of unipolar and low-level to balanced and high-level, with observable growths in industrial, cultural, and ecological sectors, but poor performances of organization and talent inspiration. Nearly half of counties had not yet reach the high-level of rural revitalization, which needs more efforts.(2)The spatial evolution trend of rural revitalization level basically kept a trend of low in the north and high in the south in the east-west direction, and it would be converted from high in the east and low in the west to high in the west and low in the east, with overall differences shrinking. The revitalization process was mainly driven by industry, ecology, and culture sectors, aligning with some of regional features, officially designated as an ecological civilization demonstration region, a southern collective forest area, etc.(3)Over the past decade, the obstacle degrees from land productivity and total mechanical power per unit of cultivated land rose significantly, gradually being the main obstacle factor, which in 2020 had average values of 17.22% and 15.70%, respectively. To enhance land productivity and agricultural mechanization is expected to be the key for future rural revitalization.
This study can be a valuable reference for better coordination of human-land relations in poverty-alleviation mountainous areas, realizing the effective articulation of consolidating the achievements of poverty alleviation and rural revitalization, as well as realizing the comprehensive revitalization and high-quality development of the countryside.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.[LIU Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[2] 刘彦随. 新时代乡村振兴地理学研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 461-466.[LIU Yansui. Research on the geography of rural revitalization in the new era[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 461-466] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190133
[3] 罗庆, 陈思旖, 王艺霏, 等. 贫困山区乡村发展类型识别及振兴路径研究——以河南省栾川县为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(10): 1783-1794.[LUO Qing, CHEN Siyi, WANG Yifei, et al. Identification of rural development types and revitalization paths in poor mountainous areas: Taking Luanchuan county, Henan province as an example[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(10): 1783-1794] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.10.001
[4] 王蓉, 赵雪雁, 兰海霞. 脱贫山区乡村振兴基础水平评价及其影响因素——以陇南山区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(8): 1389-1402.[WANG Rong, ZHAO Xueyan, LAN Haixia. Evaluation of the foundation of rural revitalization in out-of-poverty mountainous areas and its influencing factors: A case study of the Longnan mountainous areas[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(8): 1389-1402] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.08.004
[5] 宋川, 张宁. 河北省乡村振兴水平评价及空间差异研究[J/OL]. 中国农业资源与区划. http://kns.cn ki.net/kcms2/detail/11.3513.S.20230608.1220.008.html[SONG Chuan, ZHANG Ning. Evaluation of rural revitalization level and research on spatial differences in Hebei province[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning. http://kns.cn ki.net/kcms2/detail/11.3513.S.20230608.1220.008.html]
[6] 郭远智, 刘彦随. 中国乡村发展进程与乡村振兴路径[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421.[GUO Yuanzhi, LIU Yansui. The process of rural development and paths for rural revitalization in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1408-1421] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202106007
[7] 廖文梅, 虞娟娟, 袁若兰. 脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴的耦合协同性——基于不同时序脱贫县(市)的比较[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(10): 132-142.[LIAO Wenmei, YU Juanjuan, YUAN Ruolan. Coupling synergy between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization: A comparison between poverty alleviation counties(cities)based on different time series[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(10): 132-142]DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20200326
[8] 易小燕, 陈印军, 向雁, 等. 县域乡村振兴指标体系构建及其评价——以广东德庆县为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(8): 187-195.[YI Xiaoyan, CHEN Yinjun, XIANG Yan, et al. Construction and evaluation of index system for county rural revitalization: The case of Deqing county of Guandong province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2020, 41(8): 187-195] DOI: 10. 7621 /cjarrp. 1005-9121. 20200821
[9] 文琦, 郑殿元. 西北贫困地区乡村类型识别与振兴途径研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 509-521.[WEN Qi, ZHENG Dianyuan. Identification and revitalization of rural poverty-stricken areas in northwest China[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 509-521] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020181230
[10] 国家统计局. 中国县域统计年鉴(2011—2021)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2011-2021.[National Bureau of Statistics. China county statistical yearbook(2011-2021)[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press]
[11] 李鑫, 马晓冬, 胡嫚莉. 乡村地域系统人-地-业要素互馈机制研究[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(7): 1981-1994.[LI Xin, MA Xiaodong, HU Manli. The mutual feedback mechanism of human-land-industry factors of the rural regional system[J]. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(7): 1981-1994] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020210628
[12] 吕承超, 崔悦. 乡村振兴发展: 指标评价体系、地区差距与空间极化[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021(5): 20-32.[LYU Chengchao, CUI Yue. Rural vitalization and development: Evaluation index system, regional disparity and spatial polarization[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021(5): 20-32] DOI: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2021.05.004
[13] 唐玉萍, 潘洪义, 张之凤, 等.山地丘陵区乡村类型划分及乡村振兴路径研究———以绵阳市为例[J]. 山地学报, 2022, 40(5): 764-777.[TANG Yuping, PAN Hongyi, ZHANG Zhifeng, et al. Classification of village types and the corresponding path of rural revitalization in mountainous areas—a case study of Mianyang city, Sichuan province, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2022, 40(5): 764-777] DOI: 10. 16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000710
[14] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 中共中央国务院印发《乡村振兴战略规划(2018—2022年)》[EB/OL]. 新华社, 2018- 09-26[2024 -03-18]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-09/26/content_5325534.htm.[The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. The CPC Central Committee and The State Council issued the Strategic Plan for Rural Revitalization(2018-2022)[EB/OL]. Xinhua News Agency, 2018- 09-26[2024 -03-18]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-09/26/content_5325534.htm]
[15] 李繁荣. 中国乡村振兴与乡村功能优化转型[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(12): 2158-2167.[LI Fanrong. Rural revitalization and rural functional optimization and transformation in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica. 2021, 41(12): 2158-2167] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.12.009
[16] 杨忍, 罗秀丽, 陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328.[YANG Ren, LUO Xiuli, CHEN Yanchun. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of rural multifunctionality at county level in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.005
[17] STASTNA M, VAISHAR A. The relationship between public transport and the progressive development of rural areas[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017, 67: 107-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.022
[18] 刘志涛, 王少剑, 方创琳. 粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务价值的时空演化及其影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2797-2813.[LIU Zhitao, WANG Shaojian, FANG Chuanglin. Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing mechanism of ecosystem service value in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(11): 2797-2813] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202111014
[19] 周国华, 刘畅, 唐承丽, 等. 湖南乡村生活质量的空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(12): 2475-2489.[ZHOU Guohua, LIU Chang, TANG Chengli, et al. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of quality of life in rural areas of Hunan province[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(12): 2475-2489] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201812009
[20] 贾义保. 论新时代农村社会治理创新的逻辑进路[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2021(3): 149-158.[JIA Yibao. The new logical approach to the innovation of rural social governance in the new era[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition), 2021(3): 149-158]
[21] 闫周府, 吴方卫. 从二元分割走向融合发展——乡村振兴评价指标体系研究[J]. 经济学家, 2019(6): 90-103.[YAN Zhoufu, WU Fangwei. From binary segmentation to convergence development: A study on the evaluation index system of rural revitalization[J]. Economist, 2019(6): 90-103] DOI: 10.16158/j.cnki.51-1312/f.2019.06.010
[22] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.[XIE Gaodi, ZHANG Caixia, ZHANG Leiming, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254] DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001
[23] 樊新刚, YELAO Yiachong, 马振宁, 等. 区域生态服务价值约束的可持续经济规模量化方法构建[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(12): 2186-2195.[FAN Xingang, YELAO Yiachong, MA Zhenning, et al. Construction of the quantification method of sustainable economic scale constrained by regional ecological services value[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(12): 2186-2195] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.12.012
[24] 荣慧芳, 陶卓民. 基于网络数据的乡村旅游热点识别及成因分析——以江苏省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2848-2861.[RONG Huifang, TAO Zhuomin. Hotspot identification and cause analysis of rural tourism based on website data: Take Jiangsu province as an example[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(12): 2848-2861] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20201203
[25] 邹秀清, 谢美辉, 肖泽干, 等. 基于熵权-TOPSIS法的乡村发展评价及障碍因子诊断[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(10): 197-206.[ZOU Xiuqing, XIE Meihui, XIAO Zegan, et al. Evaluation of rural development and diagnosis of obstacle factors based on entropy weight TOPSIS method[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(10): 197-206] DOI: 10. 7621/cjarrp. 1005-9121. 20211021
[26] 丘水林, 靳乐山. 资本禀赋对生态保护红线区农户人为活动限制受偿意愿的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2022, 32(1): 146-154.[QIU Shuilin, JIN Leshan. Influence of capital on the willingness to accept compensation for human activity restrictions in ecological protection red line areas[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2022, 32(1): 146-154] DOI: 10.12062/cpre. 20210617
[27] QI Wei, DENG Yu, FU Bojie. Rural attraction: The spatial pattern and driving factors of China's rural inmigration[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022, 93: 461-470. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.008
[28] 周苏娥, 张明军, 王圣杰, 等. 甘肃省河西地区自然-社会系统脆弱性评价[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(2): 452-462.[ZHOU Sue, ZHANG Mingjun, WANG Shengjie, et al. Assessment of vulnerability in natural-social system in Hexi, Gansu[J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40(2): 452-462] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2018.02.20
[29] 张佰林, 高江波, 高阳, 等. 中国山区农村土地利用转型解析[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 503-517.[ZHANG Bailin, GAO Jiangbo, GAO Yang, et al. Land use transition of mountainous rural areas in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(3): 503-517] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201803009
[30] GUO Yuanzhi, LIU Yansui. Poverty alleviation through land assetization and its implications for rural revitalization in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 105: 105418. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105418
[31] 王亚辉, 李秀彬, 辛良杰, 等. 中国土地流转的区域差异及其影响因素——基于2003—2013年农村固定观察点数据[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(3): 487-502.[WANG Yahui, LI Xiubin, XIN Liangjie, et al. Regional differences of land circulation in China and its drivers: Based on 2003-2013 rural fixed observation points data[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(3): 487-502] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201803008
[32] 龙明顺, 赵宇鸾, 张东丽. 山区耕地细碎化对农户耕地撂荒的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(21): 231-239.[LONG Mingshun, ZHAO Yuluan, ZHANG Dongli. Impacts of mountainous land fragmentation on cultivated land abandonment of farmers[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(21): 231-239] DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.21.027
[33] ZHOU Yang, LI Yamei, XU Chenchen. Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: Mechanisms and paths[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 91: 104379. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104379

相似文献/References:

[1]熊 熙,张仕超*,梁靖茹,等.丘陵山区家庭农场时空拓展特征及驱动力分析——以重庆市江津区为例[J].山地学报,2021,(1):71.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000577]
　XIONG Xi,ZHANG Shichao*,LIANG Jingru,et al.Spatiotemporal Expansion Characteristics and Driving Forces of Family Farms in Hilly and Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Jiangjin District of Chongqing, China[J].Mountain Research,2021,(1):71.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000577]
[2]郑光辉,蒋涤非,栾永飞,等.乡村振兴背景下的贵州农业产业空间分异[J].山地学报,2021,(3):429.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000608]
　ZHENG Guanghui,JIANG Difei,LUAN Yongfei,et al.Spatial Differentiation of Agricultural Industry in Guizhou Province of China under Rural Revitalization[J].Mountain Research,2021,(1):429.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000608]
[3]唐玉萍,潘洪义*,张之凤,等.山地丘陵区乡村类型划分及乡村振兴路径研究——以绵阳市为例[J].山地学报,2022,(5):764.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000710]
　TANG Yuping,PAN Hongyi*,ZHANG Zhifeng,et al.Classification of Village Types and the Corresponding Path of Rural Revitalization in Mountainous Areas—A Case Study of Mianyang City, Sichuan Province, China[J].Mountain Research,2022,(1):764.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000710]
[4]邓 伟,张少尧,王占韵,等.乡村振兴:山村发展路径与模式的科学探究[J].山地学报,2022,(6):791.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000713]
　DENG Wei,ZHANG Shaoyao,WANG Zhangyun,et al.Rural Revitalization in China: Scientific Inquiry into the Development Path and Mode of Mountain Villages[J].Mountain Research,2022,(1):791.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000713]
[5]邓 伟,等.乡村振兴:山村土地功能-景观结构与空间效应的探究[J].山地学报,2024,(4):431.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000835]
　DENG Wei,ZHANG Shaoyao,ZHANG Hao,et al.Rural Revitalization: An Exploration of Land Function-Landscape Structure and Spatial Effects in Mountainous Villages[J].Mountain Research,2024,(1):431.[doi:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000835]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期(Received date): 2023- 07-28; 改回日期(Accepted date):2024- 02-23
基金项目(Foundation item): 江西省社会科学基金(22YJ39)。[Social Science Foundation of Jiang Province(22YJ39)]
作者简介(Biography): 周达宝(2000-),男,江西吉安人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:城乡发展与土地利用变化。[ZHOU Dabao(2000-), male, born in Ji'an, Jiangxi province, M.Sc. candidate, research on urban-rural development and land use change] E-mail: warriors3030@163.com
*通讯作者(Corresponding author): 徐丽婷(1992-),女,博士,讲师,主要研究方向:城乡发展与土地利用变化。[XU Liting(1992-), female, Ph.D., lecturer, research on urban-rural development and land use change] E-mail: liting.xu@jxnu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-01-30